Politics & Government

City Councilors Counter New London Mayor's Budget With Two Proposals

Council President Michael Passero, Councilor Adam Sprecace identify potential revenues and savings for New London's 2014 budget

Two city councilors have offered ideas for restoring budget cuts proposed by Mayor Daryl Finizio in the 2014 fiscal year budget.

Council President Michael Passero and Councilor Adam Sprecace each presented proposals at Monday’s Finance Committee meeting. Both proposals reduce the proposed school budget increase and replenish funding for several departments that were cut in Finizio’s budget.

The committee voted 2-1 to have Finance Director Jeff Smith reform the 2014 budget along Passero’s proposal to allow the Finance Department to review the numbers. This review will take place prior to a special City Council meeting on the budget next Monday.

Finizio’s budget of $81,016,213 approves the Board of Education’s request of a 2.5 percent increase to the New London Public Schools to bring it to $40,814,666  It reduces the municipal budget 2.5 percent to $40,201,547. Under the proposal, the mill rate—or tax per $1,000 of assessed value—would increase 3.09 percent from 26.2 to 27.42.

Finizio's proposal included a number of major cuts to departments, including a $1.4 million reduction in the New London Police Department, $500,000 reductions to both the New London Fire Department and Department of Public Works, 50 percent reductions to the Recreation Department and Public Library of New London, and defunding of the Senior Center. Finizio said such cuts were necessary to offset anticipated shortfalls in the state’s municipal aid and other revenues.

Department heads said they would have to lay off employees and curtail services to meet this budget. Police Chief Margaret Ackley said 20 police officers would have to be laid off to stay within the budget proposal, while library director Suzanne Maryeski said the library would have to reduce its hours and programs. At last week’s City Council meeting, several residents advocated for retaining funding for senior and youth programs

Sprecace numbers

Sprecace’s budget proposal would increase expenditures by $273,130 to $81,289,343 and revenues by $273,619 to $81,269,832. This proposal includes:

  • Reducing the school budget increase to one percent for a savings of $599,087
  • Restoring $1,243,388 to the New London Police Department budget with $14,550 in additional savings from reductions to line items within the department 
  • Restoring the $500,000 cut to the New London Fire Department and reducing overtime expenditures by $250,000 
  • Restoring the $500,000 cut to the Department of Public Works, with $149,100 in reductions to line items within the department 
  • Restoring the library, Recreation Department, and Senior Center to their fiscal year 2013 funding levels 
  • A total of $1,777,826 in reductions to employee expenses including $733,824 from an unemployment compensation reserve due to the elimination of layoffs, $350,000 due to health insurance overestimates, and a reduction of the pension-defined benefit expenditure to the fiscal year 2013 fiscal year level
  • Removing two $25,000 items for funding Sailfest and special events from the City Council budget and putting it in a contingency fund 

Passero numbers

Passero’s budget proposal, which he made in consultation with Smith, identifies $1,735,029 in available funding from additional revenue as well as savings within the budget. It includes:

  • An additional $788,789 in state revenue restored by the Connecticut General Assembly since Finizio’s proposal based on Gov. Dannel Malloy’s cuts 
  • Reducing the school budget increase to 1.5 percent for a savings of $450,000 
  • A reduction in unemployment costs by $458,640 
  • A restoration of $350,000 to both the fire department and Public Works 
  • A restoration of $250,000 to the library, $229,400 to the Senior Center, and $176,000 to the Recreation Department 
  • A restoration of $251,629—left over after allocations to other departments—to the police department 

Accuracy of estimates

Both Passero and Sprecace noted how there are some similarities in their proposals, but also expressed concerns about their respective numbers. Sprecace said he couldn’t support the proposal drawn up by Passero and Smith because it still assumes some layoffs. He said he thought the committee should proceed with his budget as a baseline.

“If there are areas within my proposal that the Council feels are inaccurate, we can address those,” he said.

Passero said he was reluctant to support some of the cuts within the budget that Sprecace was proposing without a closer look by the Finance Department.

“This doesn’t go all the way to where you want to be, but it doesn’t go all the way to where I want to be, and there’s still time left to fine tune this,” Passero said.

Smith also said he wanted more time to review Sprecace’s numbers. He said he might dispute some of the identified savings, since the initial analysis of health insurance costs found that savings would not be available there.

“I don’t think we should use money that might not be available on July 1,” said Smith.

Councilor Donald Macrino, the Finance Committee chairman, said he thought the proposals presented a good framework for the Council to develop a final budget. However, he said the committee should be conservative in its estimates and take more time to review the numbers.

“We remain in a very fragile state, and we have a great history of overestimating our revenues and coming up short in the end,” he said.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here