.
Feedback

New London Schools Establishing Literacy Requirement For Graduation

Students would need 10th grade level functionality to receive diploma

Beginning with the class entering this fall, seniors will have to show a 10th grade level of reading and writing ability to graduate under a plan currently being developed by the Board of Education.

The board voted unanimously last week to have their Policy Committee begin working on a policy outlining the requirement. The standard was proposed by both the Policy Committee and the Curriculum Standards, Development and Implementation Committee.

Dr. Nicholas Fischer, superintendent of the , said literacy is one of the most important skills a graduating student can have, but that this requirement is not included in the state standards. He said he believes few if any schools in Connecticut have a literacy standard. Graduating students in New London are required to earn a certain number of credits, including a demonstration of English proficiency. This can be done through demonstrated skill on the Connecticut Academic Performance Test or by “satisfactorily completing a district-performance task designed and assessed by New London High School teachers.”

However, these standards are not precise enough to require students to be sufficiently literate upon graduation. There is no definition for satisfactory completion of the district-performance task, and state law does not allow the CAPT to be used as a high-stakes test. The district cannot prevent a student who fails the standardized test from graduating.

The requirement will have students demonstrate functional literacy, or the ability to understand words and apply them to a task. This is a higher standard than basic literacy, in which a person understands only certain words and phrases such as those on traffic signs.

Students must demonstrate literacy in one of four ways: achievement on the CAPT; demonstrated ability using the Northwest Education Association standard for reading skills and Pearson standard for writing skills; passing the General Education Development test for English; or passing the Informal Reading Inventory, which uses a Pearson writing sample and portfolio of student work.

“There has to be more than one way to determine if a kid has acquired language, so here we’re trying to offer multiple options,” said Fischer.

Fischer said the effort will be paired with existing programs for students who are not native English speakers or in special education. He said about 20 percent of the students are considered English Language Learners, and generally pick up the language faster if they are introduced at a young age. He said provisions would have to be made for both ELL students and special education students to determine how they could reasonably be expected to meet the literacy requirement.

The literacy requirement will also borrow from a special education requirement giving those students access to services until they are 21 years old. Students will have the first opportunity to demonstrate literacy in 10th grade, allowing them two additional years of school to meet the requirement if needed. They will also have free access to Adult Education courses, evening courses, and online programs to work toward the requirement until age 21.

Board of Education Secretary Jason Catala said on Thursday that he wanted to ensure special education students would not be left behind by the requirement. Board member Louise Hanrahan said the requirement could be adapted to their needs. Fischer said he feels about 90 percent of special education students could meet the requirement, with another five percent capable of earning a certificate of completion.

The board’s attorney determined that establishing a literacy standard would not violate state or federal guidelines.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?