.
Feedback

Demonstrators Ask President To Keep Promises (With Video)

Peace protesters say they want to remind Obama why they voted for him

Compared to the protests held when President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney were commencement speakers at the , the protest organized by the Southeastern Connecticut Peace and Justice Network to coincide with President Barack Obama’s appearance at the academy in New London on May 18 was a quiet affair.

President Bush’s appearance drew a crowd of 400 protestors, organizer Joanne Sheehan recalled, whereas this protest boasted barely 40 people. Then again, Sheehan said, this wasn’t as much of a protest as it was an opportunity to remind President Obama of the promises he made when he was elected.

“A lot of the people here voted for him,” Sheehan said. “But we voted for promises he’s not keeping.”

The protest began with participants reading aloud a letter to President Obama signed by 234 people that organizers had paid to have printed in .

“Mr. President, we were inspired by the dream of change you championed in your campaign—from closing Guantanamo Bay, to comprehensive immigration reform, to greening America through renewable energy, to providing affordable health care for all,” read Sheehan’s son Patrick Sheehan-Gaumer of New London. “We urge you to hold firm that vision. Hold firm to requiring that all contribute generously to the general good. Hold firm to a government that upholds the rights of people more than the privileges of corporations. Hold firm to becoming a peacemaker on whom we and the people of all nations can rely.”

Pushing shopping carts to represent the homeless, wearing white lab coats to represent health care, and donning orange jump suits to remind people of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay, protesters followed a route to the Coast Guard Academy with stops designed to draw attention to different social justice issues.

The protest began downtown at New London’s Parade Plaza. Standing in front of the Soldiers & Sailors, Joanne Sheehan spoke out against increases in military spending at a time when funding for education and health care is being cut. The federal budget for 2012 has earmarked $1.372 billion for military spending, she said, noting that amounts to 48 percent of the federal budget. 

“Today, we’re going to visit the places where the money isn’t,” said Sheehan.

The group’s next stop was the Crystal Avenue high rise apartments, where Paul Jakoboski of St. Francis House in New London pointed out that nearly 4,000 people use emergency housing shelters every day in Connecticut and that, according to the Connecticut Coalition to End Homelessness, half of the people staying at homeless shelters today have never experienced homelessness before.

“There was an attempt to tear these housing units down and build more modern, energy efficient housing,” added Kit Johnson of Stonington, referring to the government-subsidized high rise apartments  on Crystal Avenue. “A grant was applied for but it was turned down.”

At the Coast Guard Academy, Board of Education member Ronna Stuller of New London spoke about the rising cost of education. “A Pell grant helped me earn a degree,” she said. “Today, in-state students at UConn are expected to spend $20,000 a year if they live on campus, yet Pell grants are being reduced.” How many students would benefit, she asked, if the $2 billion the government plans to spend on two new attack submarines went to fund education instead?

With no sign of the President, who was inside the Academy at that point, the march continued to its next stop: the Nathan Hale statue at , a neighborhood that is home to many health care providers.  “In 2008, we elected Barack Obama as our president and he promised health care reform,” said John Murphy of Connecticut Citizens Action Group. Those efforts, he said, had been stymied by lobbying from corporations that make money on health care. “Health care is a right, not a privilege,” he said.

Sandra Brindamour, executive director of Alliance for Living also took the opportunity to point out that her agency’s budget had been cut by $100,000 and that 11 housing units that provided permanent homes for people with HIV and AIDS who are too sick to work had been lost.   

At a stop in front of , Frieda Berrigan of Witness Against Torture called for President Obama to make good on his promise to release all prisoners still being detained at Guantanamo Bay and to prohibit the use of enhanced interrogation techniques. “Torture is never moral, never right, and is completely ineffective,” said Berrigan.

The last stop on the march was a branch on State Street, where protestors entered the bank to present the manager with bill for unpaid income taxes. After the federal government spent billions to bail out banks, Alexandra Ferreira of Connecticut Citizens Action Group said, “It’s about time we held them accountable. They need to pay their fair share.”

Although one bank employee threatened to call the police, another manager took the whole thing in stride, listened to what the protestors had to say and gave them contact information for the bank's corporate spokesperson.

The march ended back at the Parade Plaza with a free lunch provided by the organization Food Not Bombs.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!