.
Feedback

What Happened to Facebook Stock?

18 Bucks!? Since the initial public offering of Facebook stock, the price has dropped precipitously, from a starting point of $42, to a new low point today of $18.40 (as of this writing).

18 Bucks!? Since the initial public offering of Facebook stock, the price has dropped precipitously, from a starting point of $42, to a new low point today of $18.40 (as of this writing). To get an idea of the IPO process itself, you can refer back to the article I wrote on the Facebook IPO process back in February.


Why Did Facebook go Public Anyway?
As I wrote in my previous Facebook article, there are a number of reasons for companies to go public. In Facebook’s case, they had plenty of cash for operations, didn’t have debt to restructure, and the founder wasn’t retiring. The primary reason was to “cash out” the hundreds of private equity holders – namely employees – that had been promised a public offering to monetize their shares.

Selling it to Main Street
Before we get to the price slump, it’s important to understand the parties involved in the IPO process. It’s a complex exercise, but to keep things simple, we’ll boil it down to the IPO company (FB) and the underwriting consortium. In this case, the lead underwriting firms consisted of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, Goldman Sachs, and JP Morgan. There were another 30 or so investment banks hired into the consortium to help sell the shares to the public. The role of the underwriters is to essentially get the shares to market by selling them to institutional (Wall Street) and retail (Main Street) clients.

“UnLike”
OK, speed-round - here it is in a nutshell:

Facebook needs to cash out their employees and owners, so they hire the big brokerage firms to take them public;

Big brokerage firms do everything they can to pump up Facebook to the public in order to create “buzz” and get the maximum stock price at the point of the IPO. The underwriters get a percentage of the “take”, so the more shares they sell at a higher price, the higher the fees to the brokerage firms;

Moments before Facebook stock is set to go public, Facebook executives reveal to the brokerage firms that their revenue and profit forecasts are not as optimistic as they once thought. FB and brokerages are forced to cut forecasts, and amend their S1 filing (a required SEC document). However, the analysts at the brokerage firms reveal this new (material) information mostly to their largest and preferred investors (a no-no);

Facebook quietly increases the number of shares available for “common” investors to buy, while at the same time existing shareholders of then-private FB stock increase the number of shares they plan to SELL when the stock goes public. Several large, institutional investors reduce the number of shares they plan to buy. This is peculiar, since one would expect the “smart money” investors to be big buyers;

FB stock opens for trading and promptly loses $4 off its stock price on the opening day. Subsequent days see additional losses and investors are perplexed as to what is happening. Facebook continues its “death spiral”, dropping all the way to $18 over the course of the next 3 months. Stock losses are exacerbated by continued selling by insiders;

In order to save face and keep the stock price elevated, Morgan Stanley (lead underwriter) becomes the single largest buyer of FB shares, with 8 of the top 9 mutual funds in the nation that hold FB stock being managed by Morgan Stanley. Investors in Morgan Stanley mutual funds left holding the bag on substantial price drop.

So Why is Facebook Not Performing Better?
Quite simply, Facebook is having a hard time turning their hundreds of millions of users into revenue-generating customers. Most FB users take advantage of the free services of Facebook. Only a minority of businesses use the service to place ads or buy value-added services.

The majority of Facebook’s revenue comes from banner ads being sold to advertisers. This has become problematic, because, as Facebook has acknowledged, more and more users are utilizing smartphones to access the FB portal, and it is virtually impossible for Facebook to run banner ads on mobile devices.

Now the single greatest challenge for FB is to find a way of generating substantially more revenue from their users. It is doubtful that most users would ever agree to pay for use. And it is also doubtful that mobile advertising will ever become a reality in any material way. The most likely outcome is that Facebook will find a way to sell demographic user information to 3rd parties. Of course, this is pure speculation at this point, but all indications point in this direction.

The Bottom Line
FB is currently generating just north of $4B a year in revenue. The stock was originally priced at the IPO as if it had the potential to become a $25B+ company over a relatively short period of time. As reality set in, it became clear that it will be a challenge for Facebook to become a $10B company, let alone a $25B company.

There is much more to come over the next few months, as there are an additional several hundred million shares that can be sold on the open market (by insiders) between now and the end of the year. Fortunately, CEO Mark Zuckerberg has indicated that he plans to sell none of his shares during this period, other than amounts necessary to cover his tax bill for the IPO.

This will be one of the most closely watched stocks over the coming months, so strap in for a bumpy ride!

Robert Henderson is the President of Lansdowne Wealth Management in Mystic, CT. His firm specializes in financial planning and investment management for individuals approaching retirement or already in retirement, with an added focus on the particular needs of women that are divorced or widowed. He is an Accredited Asset Management Specialist and a Certified Divorce Financial Analyst. Mr. Henderson can be reached at 860-245-5078 or bhenderson@lwmwealth.com. You can also view his personal finance blog at http://lwmwealth.com/blog and the firm’s website at http://www.lwmwealth.com.

If you are an employee or retiree of General Dynamics, Pfizer, or L&M Hospital, and you would like advice and direction on managing your Fidelity 401K or Hewitt 401K plan, please sign up for our monthly newsletter, which provides complimentary ongoing advice, commentary, and model portfolios for each of those plans. You can sign up automatically at http://www.lwmwealth.com/services/your401k.html.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Marco Frucht May 21, 2013 at 05:59 pm
http://www.etsy.com/market/new_london_hates_you?ref=listing_tag something tells me the currentRead More controversy will help this tshirt maker along quite nicely. Way to go Mayor Finizio's haters.
Marco Frucht May 21, 2013 at 05:30 pm
I'll say the same thing here as the other places around PATCH where the Mayor is beingRead More proxy-attacked likewise: New London has had an image of hating people for a very long time. I grew up in Groton, and currently live and work in New London and my parents have worked all over New London county for something like 4 1/2 decades. I can certainly attest to that. This is why this shirt is so funny. Maybe it's right and proper that Zak apologizes for how his t-shirt choice made people feel. But I must say that most of the people hating on Zak right now are the very same people who perpetuate New London's image where people all over Groton, Waterford, Niantic, Lyme, Saybrook, Westerly, and on and on, feel it's safe to assume that New London just plain hates them. Yes, my first thought when I saw this article was hahaha. New London? That's more like a Boston or NYC mentality. But then my very next thought was wait, New London has taken Boston and NY's general hatred, snarkiness, and bitter loathing and heightened it to a veritable art form! That's all I can say about that really. And if "Richard Cranium" feels the need to throw invectives and ad hominems at me here too, oh well. We all know what she or he is all about.
Richard Cranium May 21, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Well there you go Jason, a real standard for character. A tattoo. Lets all go get a tat andRead More everything will be moot......cool.
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 21, 2013 at 08:57 am
Yes. That is correct. The city has been putting unqualified people into the employees DefinedRead More Pension without following the proper process of placing the requests into the Pension Committee.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?