.
Feedback

Your Voices: New London Budget Referendum

Question of whether to approve the 2013 municipal budget and tax rate proves contentious

Voters go to the polls on Tuesday to made a decision on whether to approve the $42,323,256 budget approved for municipal services. The referendum will also determine whether the 27.22 mill rate, a 7.5 percent increase over the current mill rate of 25.31, should be approved. Supporters say the budget has already been pared to a point where municipal services will be affected if further cuts are made, while opponents say there is insufficient information about the budget and that cuts can be made in areas such as overtime.

Here are some of the statements that have been made regarding the referendum:

"New London has immense potential, but it will not be met if everyone is fighting for scraps. We must work together to support each other and our government. We must keep our streets, our buildings, and our citizens safe. We must preserve our services, maintain our solvency and bond rating, and strengthen development prospects. We have already cut the fat. Cutting off limbs won't help us dig ourselves out of this financial pit." -James Dixon in a New London Patch blog

"Because I believe that the current budget increase is reasonable, and that something like a 7.5% increase is required to make up for recently lost revenues, I have no intention to gut city government if the budget fails at referendum. I will, however, use the opportunity to again request from the Finance Department, the missing elements from the budget...Most of this information was provided in the Mayor's proposed budget, but not the City Council adopted budget." -Councilor Adam Sprecace in a Facebook post

"If we accept this budget we will be righting our own ship, on our own terms. If the state is forced to right it for us, the service cuts and tax increases imposed on us would be far harsher; just ask Waterbury, or any other community that went through such a process. Such an event could sacrifice all the great progress that we are beginning to see in our city." -Mayor Daryl Finizio in an editorial in The Day

"With this adopted budget and measures taken by the Office of the Mayor we have a lean administration, smaller than recent fiscal years. We have a lean adopted budget that incorporates transparency, accountability and specific goals and incorporates a relatively small increase in debt services and insurance premiums. It calls on building what is vital to work and eliminating waste and redundancy." -Tambria Moore, treasurer of Unite New London, in an editorial for The Scope Magazine

"As a resident of New London for over a decade, a property owner, someone who works in New London, and a proud parent of 2 children who attend New London public schools, this vote severely impacts my life, my livelihood, and possibly my ability to maintain residence in a city I've come to love and call home.  Making the most informed decision means nothing is left to chance or assumption." -Sherry Pardy in a New London Patch blog

"As a New London resident and local restaurant owner, I certainly understand the burden of additional taxes. As a Republican, I don't usually support tax increases. However, in order for New London to move in a positive direction, I believe we need to support Mayor Finizio's budget. Without the revenue that a tax increase will bring into our city, I fear that the very essence that is 'New London' will be lost." -Candace Devendittis, owner of Dev's on Bank Street, in a letter to the editor in The Day

"I still think there is room in the budget for work and I am ready to put the time in to do the work and get the fat out of the budget, no matter how long it takes!" -Councilor Marie-Friess McSparran in a Facebook post

"Before you cast your vote, consider that many of us are just looking to be better informed and more confident that this is the best budget for our city right now. The price for the tax payer is too high to make anything less than a confident, informed choice. Our families have invested many years into this city and want nothing less than to see it reach its potential, but we must remain grounded and recognize that a 7.5% tax increase may not be the only option." -Jackie Hernandez commenting on an article in the Connecticut College student newspaper The College Voice regarding an effort to involve college students in the referendum

"A yes vote is a vote against the city, against transparency, against honesty, against accountability and against integrity." -Randy Drummond in a comment on the New London Patch

"If you are voting no to stick it to the mayor this will not accomplish this. A no vote only hurts you and your neighbors. The fact that the republicans are supporting a no vote should give you reason for pause. They were the ones in power when the contingency fund shrunk from millions of dollars to 300,000+" -Brian Giesing in a comment on the New London Patch

 

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Doc Halliday May 19, 2013 at 08:23 am
Should the general public be required to support the retirement of our elected/hired governmentRead More officials? Should those retirement checks be based on base salary and not base salary plus overtime/extra pay/bonuses etc? Should ALL government officials be on a 401 system instead of a government (public supported) retirement system? ie: government official retires at 95% pay, in a few years with cost of living increases that official is making more in retirement than when working. The public cannot afford to continue such high retirements. Social Security is being tapped by government officials to pay OTHER items rather than for what it was intended and future retirees who contributed to SS may be left out.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!