.
Feedback

Waterford Approves Radio Deal With New London

Waterford Board of Selectmen agrees to let city use its radio system, for a fee.

Waterford's Board of Selectmen unanimously approved a draft agreement Tuesday to allow New London to tap into , potentially saving both municipalities money.

“I don’t see it as a lot of downside,” First Selectman Dan Steward said. “I see it as a lot of upside for both Waterford and New London.”

The agreement, which extends until 2018, still needs to be approved by the Waterford Representative Town Meeting and the New London City Council, who will both vote on it next week. The move would have the city use Waterford’s existing radio network for public safety, which could save Waterford roughly $75,000 per year and save New London millions of dollars.

Waterford recently completed a $6.5 million radio system, which covers all of New London. New London would tap into that system while providing all of its own radios to its public safety personnel, to comply with a mandate from the Federal Communications Commission.

The Full Story

Five years ago, the FCC mandated that all municipalities must be using a 800 MHZ frequency for their public safety radio system by January 1, 2013. Well, five years went by and as RTM Moderator Tom Dembek put it, “the city of New London hasn’t done a darn thing.”

The FFC will shut off all of New London’s radios on that date, as they do not comply with the new mandate, Steward said. To upgrade to a 800 MHZ frequency, the city would have to install a new radio system to the tune of roughly $4 million, he said.

Instead, New London can tap into Waterford’s existing system. New London will use the “backbone” of Waterford’s system, while purchasing all its own radios and having its own channels.

Waterford’s radio system covers all of New London, Steward said. It will cost the town no extra money to have New London on the system, he said.

In return, New London will pay approximately one-third of the $225,000 annual maintenance cost for the system, or about $75,000, according to Steward. New London will pay one-third of the cost because the city has approximately half the amount of radios Waterford has, and the formula set in the agreement is based on the amount of radios each town has, he said.

Steward said he is also talking with “another client” about adding them to the system as well, which would further defray the costs for New London and Waterford. Steward refused to comment on who that client was after the selectmen's meeting.

The transition would have to happen by the end of the year, so New London can avoid breaking the mandate set by the FCC, Steward said. He said he was very hopeful to get this passed quickly, stressing again it is a savings for both towns.

The agreement would also make it unnecessary for New London to have to put a radio tower at Ocean Beach, something . New London's radio system currently doesn't cover the Ocean Beach area, although Waterford's system would, Steward said.

Who Is In Charge

Steward said there would have to be a governance council to preside over the radio system that would be composed of New London and Waterford people. However, the details of such a governance council do not exist in the agreement drafted by New London's and Waterford’s attorneys.

Steward said he “wasn’t sure” if there would be more Waterford people on the governance board than New London people, of if both municipalities would be equally represented. He said that would have to be worked out later.

The RTM will vote on the agreement on Monday. The New London City Council will vote on the agreement on Tuesday.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Zak Leavy May 18, 2013 at 10:45 am
Rich, Great blog and I couldn't agree more. American workers have a right to retire with dignityRead More and SB 54 takes another step to make that a reality. This bill is a common sense solution to the problem that many workers face as they near retirement. Considering the analysis of the bill shows only an extremely low, one-time, cost then hopefully that will be enough to have both chambers pass it.
Doc Halliday May 18, 2013 at 08:58 am
It is NOT up to the general public to support anyone in retIrement. It IS the responsibility ofRead More each individual to provide some savings for their retirement. We have to learn to NOT buy what we want but to buy responsibly what we need. My wife and I live on social security and very small savings. We have yard sales and sell off some of our "stuff" when we need cash. WE have always lived responsibly and had a good life.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!