.
Feedback

Rough Start As New London Budget Work Resumes

Renewed budget process starts with unanticipated increases; Finizio lays off staffer

The Finance Committee was told Thursday that it will have to take into account unanticipated increases in some municipal costs as it works to reduce a $42.3 million budget and tax rate rejected by voters this week.

Finance Director Jeff Smith said that based on the latest information he has received, the city will be facing higher than expected fees from the Municipal Employees Retirement System as well as Southeastern Area Transit. He said he also asked departments for a five-year average of their actual spending and determined that the expenditures budgeted for the law department are $75,000 less than what the department typically spends.

Smith had not calculated the total anticipated increase as of Thursday. The costs represent an additional hurdle for the committee as it tries to meet the goal of reducing the budget to reflect a five percent tax increase, which prior to any increases would require a cut of $1,265,000.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

A referendum vote on Tuesday rejected the passed by the City Council on June 19. Voters also overturned a tax rate of 27.22, a 7.5 percent increase from the 2012 rate of 25.31.

Councilor Adam Sprecace, who voted in favor of the budget but later supported rejecting it at referendum after saying the Finance Department did not provide sufficient information to back up the numbers, criticized the update as stoking uncertainty about the veracity of the data on New London’s finances.

“The burden of proof is going to be on the administration,” said Sprecace.

Smith defended his work with the budget, saying he has made an effort to keep the council up to date as new information on the city's revenues and expenditures becomes available. He asserted that New London’s budget difficulties arose in part from prior finance directors not keeping the council apprised of changes to the budget and said he would rather give the council the latest data than have budget overruns come as a surprise at the end of the fiscal year.

“I can give you the best numbers I can,” he said. “It’s up to you if you want to believe them or not.”

Potential savings

Mayor Daryl Finizio and Council President Michael Passero said savings are possible through debt refinancing as well as money that can be removed from the Finance Department budget. The department’s expenditures included the assumption that it would assume the costs of the New London Public Schools’ business office, but that was halted by Dr. Stephen Adamowski, a special master assigned to the district by the state.

Smith estimated that the city could save $500,000 through debt refinancing, but cautioned the estimate was based on current rates. He said the council would have to make supplemental cuts to stay within budget if the savings are lower than what it anticipates.

Finizio said Thursday that Police Chief Margaret Ackley will address the council on Monday regarding savings amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars. He said these cuts can be made to the New London Police Department with no layoffs and without compromising public safety or cutting the K-9 program. Passero said the savings may come from eliminating funds for currently vacant positions.

Passero also said the council would take into consideration suggestions on specific areas that might be cut. Several residents addressed the committee at the beginning of the meeting to this effect, suggesting efforts to privatize some services or stronger enforcement against unregistered vehicles. Bill Cornish, a former city councilor, said an expenditure offsetting an anticipated $1 million in uncollected taxes was an unfair penalty against solvent residents.

“Don’t put that money in the budget,” said Cornish. “That’s just a burden on the taxpayers of New London.”

Union support

Some residents also questioned the stance of unions in the referendum vote. Representatives from several municipal unions advocated approval of the budget and tax rate, leading to some criticism against employees who work for the city but live in other communities. Avner Gregory, of the group Lower Our Taxes, said he felt the city has conceded too much to the unions over the years.

“Previous councils have not been doing their job,” said Gregory. “They seem to be favoring the unions.”

Speakers at the meeting also accused Passero and Councilor Anthony Nolan of having a conflict of interest in budget matters. Passero works for the New London Fire Department and Nolan is a police officer. Both councilors defended their public service, saying they have recused themselves from votes related to their departments.

“I do my best to lead and step away on things that are possible conflicts, and I will continue to do so,” said Nolan.

Passero said he has supported labor union in his public and private life and that he thinks the union employees have been “vilified” during the budget process. He said he has no greater conflict of interest than any other resident and that councilors are responsible for any such conflicts and recusing themselves from discussion.

“I don’t think it’s fair to attack my character until you see some conduct that justifies that accusation,” he said.

Finizio statement

Finizio said Wednesday that he will submit a revised budget proposal which will only remove the Finance Department funds related to the business office transfer. He recommended that the council look at reducing grants and subsidies, including municipal funds allocated to the Public Library of New London, but said the council will have the final word on any reductions.

“The only insistence that I have is that we are very careful at looking at revenues,” he said.

Finizio said the city is “effectively pushing below rock bottom” in seeking to reach a level where the tax rate goes up by five percent. He said there is a high possibility of running a deficit if revenues and expenditures are not on par with the budget and that service reductions and layoffs are probable later in the year if this does not occur.

Finizio also announced that he has laid off his office manager, Tammy Daugherty. He praised her performance in the role, saying she had been instrumental in municipal matters such as organizing OpSail 2012 and finalizing an emergency communications agreement with Waterford.

“This is a loss to the city,” said Finizio, “but I do believe that cuts need to be made at every level of city government.”

Continuing work

The Finance Committee will next meet at 6 p.m. on Monday and Tuesday at City Hall. Passero said he hopes the committee can have a new budget prepared by Oct. 1, the date of the next City Council meeting. If a budget is not in place by the time 25 percent of the 2012 fiscal year budget has been spent, the council must pass an appropriation ordinance to provide funding for municipal services.

Passero asked Smith to prepare a list of vacant city positions to determine where the city has budgeted for positions that are no longer filled. Sprecace requested more details to confirm the anticipated cost savings in a tentative agreement between the administration and New London Police Union.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Doc Halliday May 19, 2013 at 08:23 am
Should the general public be required to support the retirement of our elected/hired governmentRead More officials? Should those retirement checks be based on base salary and not base salary plus overtime/extra pay/bonuses etc? Should ALL government officials be on a 401 system instead of a government (public supported) retirement system? ie: government official retires at 95% pay, in a few years with cost of living increases that official is making more in retirement than when working. The public cannot afford to continue such high retirements. Social Security is being tapped by government officials to pay OTHER items rather than for what it was intended and future retirees who contributed to SS may be left out.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!