POLL: Would You Support A New London Charter Revision Commission?

Do you think a commission is needed to address issues with the City Charter or take another look at the city's form of government?

The City Council has taken two votes on establishing a charter revision commission in the past two months, each time failing to muster enough support to approve such a seven-member board. A was 4-2 in favor, falling one vote short of the two-thirds majority needed for approval. A vote on Monday .

Monday's vote came shortly after a July 29 guest editorial in in which Michael Buscetto III - a former City Councilor who earned the second highest number of votes in the 2011 mayoral election - criticized the administration of Mayor Daryl Finizio and supported the formation of a commission. Buscetto also recommended that the commission reduce the mayor's term from four years to two. Some New London Patch users have urged the formation of such a commission to eliminate the strong mayor and return New London to a city manager style of government.

Councilor John Maynard, who proposed the commission for Monday's agenda, said he was not seeking to overturn or restrict the mayoral form of government. He said the commission is needed to fix issues with the authority of the mayor or City Council, such as how the charter says the council must approve the mayor's appointment of a law director but also allows the mayor to fire the law director without council approval.

Opponents of the commission said changes to the charter can be made by ordinance, and expressed concerns that a commission could make reactionary changes to the form of government in response to Finizio's first eight months in office. There were also concerns that the strong mayor form of government - reinstated for the first time in 90 years by a - has not been adequately tested and that it is premature to reconvene a commission at this point.

Do you think there should be a charter review commission? Let us know in the poll.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Spencer August 08, 2012 at 01:22 AM
If the Mayor views this charter writen as it is the reasoning behind his way of doing his job thus far, then something is obviously wrong with how it is writen. We do not need to give up a 4 year term Mayor--we just need to redefine what type of govermental powr this mayor and future mayor should obtain.
Felicia Hendersen August 08, 2012 at 09:20 AM
The charter is the governing document for our city and should be reviewed annually. There should be a standing charter review commission that can address isues with the charter as they occur and on any needed or proposed changes could be taken up at the election each year. To refuse to seat a charter review commission is a bad move preventing the people from participating in the overall operation of the government that they pay for.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »