.
Feedback

Police Chief Discussions Remain Under Wraps

City law director to meet with Margaret Ackley and counsel on Wednesday

The City Council briefly discussed the status of matters discussed in executive session last week, but kept the content of that meeting confidential on Monday.

In a , the council deliberated for two and a half hours on a single agenda item specifying that the discussion was about the employment of Chief Margaret Ackley of the but not her performance or evaluation. Ackley, who is still employed by the city, declined to have the scheduled executive session open to the public.

Ackley was accompanied during the executive session by her attorney, Shelley Graves. Prior to the session, Graves asked Councilor Michael Buscetto III to recuse himself from the discussion; he refused. Ackley, councilors, and city law director Thomas Londregan declined comment after that meeting, although Londregan read a statement declaring that there is an agreement between Ackley and City Manager Denise Rose with confidentiality provisions.

Councilor Rob Pero said Monday that the council wants to explain why it went into the session in order to dispel rumors. He said a special meeting should be called as soon as possible to resolve the matter once it becomes possible to do so.

“I think it just continues on with a crisis that isn’t meant to be a crisis,” he said.

Londregan said he is meeting with Ackley and Graves on Wednesday, with the discussion to include a request for information on the session under the Freedom of Information Act. He said he is of the opinion that the withholding of information on the discussions does not constitute a violation of the act.

“I don’t want you reading something in the newspaper before I meet with you,” Londregan told the council.

Olsen said he was concerned with the uncertainty over whether or not Ackley has a contract with the city. Londregan responded, “It could be a draft.” He said such a document could be kept private if it is in its preliminary stages and dealing with finances. Londregan added that Ackley essentially has the job “for life” unless she resigns or is fired for cause.

Rose said the only individual employment contracts for municipal employees are for Deputy Chief Marshall Segar and herself. She said personnel polices, including some in place to comply with state or federal guidelines and address liability issues, apply to all municipal employees but may be modified by union contracts.

“The police chief generally follows the police contract,” said Rose. “There may be some variations with regard to different aspects.”

Two residents spoke in support of Ackley during the meeting’s public comment section. Evelyn Louziotis said she wanted to know what had happened at the meeting and why Buscetto had been asked to recuse himself.

“We are taxpayers and we ought to know what’s going on in New London,” she said.

“I think she’s done a phenomenal job, and I’m so glad to have a woman in that position,” Sara Chaney said of Ackley. “I think it’s really elevated the town.”

Londregan declined comment after the meeting.

“Right now on this issue, it’s going to have to wait,” he said.

Ackley, the first woman to be police chief in New London, has been with the department since 1986. She was sworn into the office on June 26, 2009.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 21, 2013 at 08:57 am
Yes. That is correct. The city has been putting unqualified people into the employees DefinedRead More Pension without following the proper process of placing the requests into the Pension Committee.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?