.
Feedback

ODP Director's Role Could Be Scrutinized In Budget Season

New London city councilors respond to criticism on Mayor Daryl Finizio’s decision to have administrator assume development director’s duties

Councilor Adam Sprecace said Monday that the question of whether Mayor Daryl Finizio’s administrator should assume the duties of director of the Office of Development and Planning might be an issue that comes up during the preparation of the 2014 municipal budget.

Sprecace was responding to a resident’s accusation that the City Council has not put enough checks and balances on the mayor’s office, in particular with the decision regarding the ODP. Finizio announced last week that Tammy Daugherty, originally appointed as office administrator and principal secretary in the mayor’s office, would assume the duties of ODP director on April 1 when current director Kristin Havrilla Clarke leaves to take an economic development position in Groton.

Finzio said Daugherty will receive a $72,000 salary as part of the new responsibilities, a $20,000 raise from her current salary. He said the appointment represents a cost savings since the salary is $18,000 less than Clarke’s salary and allows the city to pay benefits for one employee instead of two.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Sprecace said Finizio informed him of the decision a couple of days before it was announced.

“I agree with the mayor in the sense that he is trying to consolidate services,” he said. “I believe Tammy Daugherty is very capable.”

Sprecace said he had some concerns with the decision, however, including whether Daugherty will be able to take on all responsibilities of the ODP director. He said more information on this question will likely be part of the preparation of the 2014 fiscal year budget, particularly in light of anticipated cuts in state funding.

“Everything is on the table this budget season,” said Sprecace.

Resident Dennis Downing criticized the mayor’s appointment of Daugherty during the public comment session. Downing said his remarks were not meant to be an attack on Daugherty, but that he felt Finizio had not done enough to post the job or look for potentially more qualified people in the ODP to fill the post. Downing said he thinks few of the councilors are doing enough to scrutinize Finizio’s actions.

“The majority is just doing whatever the mayor wants to do,” he said.

Council President Michael Passero said he resented Downing’s remarks since under the City Charter, the Council is not permitted to dictate any mayoral appointments or in any way prevent the mayor from “exercising the mayor’s own judgment in the appointment and removal of officers or employees in the administrative service of the city.”

“You can question his judgment, but it’s his judgment and its not for us to interfere with,” said Passero.

The City Council approved funding for Clarke and Daugherty’s positions after their appointments, but both salaries were cut in the Council's initial approved budget for the 2013 fiscal year. Finizio vetoed this budget, in part because he said it eliminated crucial administrative positions such as the ODP director.

Finizio later said that Daugherty had been laid off following the rejection of the first post-veto budget at referendum, but Daugherty ultimately remained on the payroll after Finizio said the Finance Department had funding available for the position.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Marco Frucht May 21, 2013 at 05:59 pm
http://www.etsy.com/market/new_london_hates_you?ref=listing_tag something tells me the currentRead More controversy will help this tshirt maker along quite nicely. Way to go Mayor Finizio's haters.
Marco Frucht May 21, 2013 at 05:30 pm
I'll say the same thing here as the other places around PATCH where the Mayor is beingRead More proxy-attacked likewise: New London has had an image of hating people for a very long time. I grew up in Groton, and currently live and work in New London and my parents have worked all over New London county for something like 4 1/2 decades. I can certainly attest to that. This is why this shirt is so funny. Maybe it's right and proper that Zak apologizes for how his t-shirt choice made people feel. But I must say that most of the people hating on Zak right now are the very same people who perpetuate New London's image where people all over Groton, Waterford, Niantic, Lyme, Saybrook, Westerly, and on and on, feel it's safe to assume that New London just plain hates them. Yes, my first thought when I saw this article was hahaha. New London? That's more like a Boston or NYC mentality. But then my very next thought was wait, New London has taken Boston and NY's general hatred, snarkiness, and bitter loathing and heightened it to a veritable art form! That's all I can say about that really. And if "Richard Cranium" feels the need to throw invectives and ad hominems at me here too, oh well. We all know what she or he is all about.
Richard Cranium May 21, 2013 at 05:07 pm
Well there you go Jason, a real standard for character. A tattoo. Lets all go get a tat andRead More everything will be moot......cool.
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 21, 2013 at 08:57 am
Yes. That is correct. The city has been putting unqualified people into the employees DefinedRead More Pension without following the proper process of placing the requests into the Pension Committee.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?