.
Feedback

No Action On New London Police Department Budget

Finance Committee begins reviewing proposed FY 2013 budget, but no funding proposal made for NLPD

Chief Margaret Ackley will appear before the Finance Committee for a second time this month after city councilors requested more information on revenues.

The committee began meeting Monday to discuss a fiscal year 2013 budget proposed by Mayor Daryl Finizio. The represents a 6.4 percent budget increase, with a mill rate increase of 4.97 mills to 30.28.

Finizio’s budget proposes an increase of $711,394, or 6.15 percent, to the police department’s budget. This would increase the budget from the $11,569,257 appropriated for the current fiscal year to $12,280,651.

Most of the proposed increases are a result of contractual obligations and benefits for employees. Ackley said there are currently vacancies in the deputy chief’s position, two captains’ positions, seven uniformed officers’ positions, and one crime analyst position. The budget proposes leaving the officers’ positions and one captain’s position vacant and unfunded for the fiscal year while budgeting for the rest.

Leaving the officers’ positions unfunded reduces uniformed payroll by $547,276. Councilor Adam Sprecace noted an increase in overtime payroll over recent years, with $450,000 budgeted for 2012 and a projection that $695,143 will be spent. The 2013 budget proposal calls for $688,800 for uniformed services overtime. Ackley said the overtime is a result of officers covering shifts with a smaller workforce, but said other factors play a part as well, including the need to use flex hours to the department's advantage.

According to the budget proposal, the department is projected to overspend its 2012 budget by $505,579. Sprecace said the City Council approved a 2012 police budget similar to that requested by the department, with the exception of . However, Ackley said she felt the budget was ultimately insufficient for the operation of the department.

“No one realized that what was in front of you was not adequate, because we were fighting over the $18,000 that wasn’t accurate,” she said.

This was a reference to budget discussions last year, which included discussions over of $10,000 for former Deputy Chief Marshall Segar and $18,000 for Ackley. On Monday, Ackley said she was unaware that former City Manager Denise Rose had included the proposals in the budget until last year's Finance Committee meeting on the police budget.

Ackley said she also felt the city is at risk of underfunding its retirement mandates, saying that the department’s expenditures could balloon if several tenured employees decide to retire. She also said she has looked to find savings in a number of areas, including deciding not to request a new detective’s position and leaving out requests for supplies such as new office equipment and voice recorders, out of concern for the potential tax increase.

“I live in the city. I’m a taxpayer. I’m very sympathetic to that,” she said.

Ackley was also asked about discussions on potentially regionalizing animal control with Waterford or Groton, and she replied that the talks came to a halt last year. She said she thinks the facility needs improvement, but that the animal control officers work to have food and supplies donated and keep the shelter’s operations going at a minimal cost to the city.

Councilor John Maynard said he felt upgrading the shelter is the best option for the city.

“We get the one-time cost of upgrading the dog pound, but in the end we’ll be saving,” he said.

Also on Monday, the Finance Committee unanimously approved:

  • A $145,000 elections budget, a reduction of $31,432 from the proposed amount.
  • The $19,000 budget requested for the .
  • A $330,142 budget for the , a reduction of $9,000 from the proposed amount.

 

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?