.
Feedback

New London Leaders Look Ahead To 2014 Budget

Passero anticipates school budget increase; Finizio thinks sustainable taxation is feasible after next budget cycle

With up to four months left before New London begins its budget process for the 2014 fiscal year, Mayor Daryl Finizio and City Council President Michael Passero are expecting that some increases may be necessary.

“You are going to see some more revenue correction,” Finizio said. “The state is pulling back on how much they’re giving the cities and towns.”

Passero also expects that revenues will be an issue during the budget cycle. He said municipal aid might be cut as part of state efforts to close a budget gap.

“The big driver of next year’s budget is going to be the state revenue streams, and all the signals seem to be ‘Prepare yourself for cuts,’” said Passero.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Passero said the city is currently working to stay within the 2013 budget and may have to make supplemental reductions in the event of overspending, since the general fund is largely depleted. He said the council will receive a report on the second quarter of the fiscal year at Monday’s meeting, which he thinks will better reflect the financial state of the city. A first quarter report projected close to a $1.2 million deficit due to overspending and revenue shortfalls, but Passero said it did not reflect changes later in the year such as reducing the staffing per shift at the New London Fire Department.

Finizio said expenditures in the 2013 fiscal year are lower than the 2012 fiscal year. However, he said the city’s workforce has also gone down by 15 percent, leaving some departments understaffed. Finizio said the New London Police Department has 26 fewer police officers than three years ago. He said those positions are not being filled, but the staffing level also raises the question of when there is an impact on public safety.

Finizio said there have also been delays in some services. Trash pickup is only occurring within regular hours so as not to run up overtime costs in the Department of Public Works, resulting in some collection delays.

Passero said he expects that the 2014 fiscal year will include a modest increase for the New London Public Schools, which are operating on a . Dr. Steven Adamowski, a special master appointed to the district by the state, has criticized the funding level as unsustainable, saying New London has the longest period of flat-funding for the schools at five years.

“The only thing we know for sure is that the school board has negotiated two new contracts that require an increase, which they told us ahead of time would require an increase,” said Passero.

Passero said the council will have to decide whether to make further cuts or increase taxes if there is a projected budget increase for 2014. Finizio said he expects a tax increase, but a smaller one than was approved for the current fiscal year. He said several factors, including fuel costs and a current reassessment of property values, will also affect the budget. However, Finizio was optimistic about the future, saying factors such as the lapse in a tax abatement on the Electric Boat property should stabilize finances.

“After we get through this year, on the city side we should be at a sustainable tax rate for several years,” he said.

Residents recently received revised tax bills for the 2013 budget year reflecting the outcome of that tumultuous process. A referendum on the municipal budget of $41,264,459 is scheduled for November, but Law Director Jeff Londregan advised the city to operate under the approved budget for the remainder of the fiscal year, which ends June 30. The budget also increased the tax rate 5.1 percent to 26.6. A referendum vote in September defeated a $42.3 million budget with a 7.5 percent tax increase.

Under the City Charter, Finizio must present the council’s Finance Committee with a preliminary 2014 budget by April 1.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!