.
Feedback

New London Artist's Painting Returns After Long Stay With Senator Lieberman

Mark Patnode’s “Mitchell Beach #9” was first sent to senator's office in 2006

Senator Joe Lieberman’s retirement is also occasioning the retirement of several pieces of artwork that were displayed in his office—including one that was recently returned to its New London artist.

Mark Patnode’s “Mitchell Beach #9” had been in Lieberman’s office in Washington, D.C. since 2006. The 30-by-40 inch oil on linen painting was first sent there as part of an art in public spaces initiative. It was formerly located directly opposite from the office entrance, making it clearly visible to all visitors.

“The fact that New London is featured at the entrance to his office is, I think, just a wonderful statement for our city,” said Patnode.

From shore to capital

When he painted the scene in 2003, Patnode was leading a summer workshop at Mitchell College. He said he wanted to show the city in a non-traditional way, focusing on its natural areas rather than urban scenes. “Mitchell Beach #9” is part of a series of paintings Patnode created portraying the view from the college’s private shore on the Thames River.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Patnode said he was part of the state’s Urban Artist Initiative, a 10-year program encompassing 10 cities. He applied to the art in public spaces initiative through a juried exhibition in the program.

“Through that, my work was chosen to go to a public space, and that space turned out to be Senator Lieberman’s office,” said Patnode.

Clarine Riddle, Lieberman’s chief of staff, said the office worked with the Connecticut Commission on Culture and Tourism to place pieces by state artists. Paintings and photography were featured in the office, reception area, and conference rooms. Although some of the art was cycled out, with several new pieces coming in during the summer of 2011, Patnode’s painting retained its prominent spot.

A senatorial favorite

“This painting was clearly one of the Senator Lieberman’s favorites,” said Riddle. “He commented many times about how he enjoyed looking at it and how it reminded him of the many beaches in Connecticut. He also commented that whenever he looked at it, he found serenity and peace in it and that that was helpful during many of the Senate’s busiest days.”

Riddle said she also enjoyed Patnode’s artwork.

“I personally always found that painting very restful and transformative,” she said. “Whenever I studied it, it wistfully took me to another location, with thoughts of future walks on the beach.”

Patnode said he maintained a connection with Lieberman’s office after “Mitchell Beach #9” was displayed there. When First Lady Laura Bush asked the senators to find a state artist to design ornaments for the White House Christmas tree in 2008, Lieberman asked Patnode to do the honors.

“Lieberman was absolutely wonderful to me,” said Patnode.

With Lieberman retiring after 24 years in the Senate, his office is returning the displayed pieces to their respective artists. Patnode said he told the office he would be willing to part with the painting, but Riddle said Senate ethics rules forbid Lieberman from accepting it.

"The Senator and staff cannot accept a gift of greater than $49.99," she said. "Mark’s painting is clearly worth more than that!"

Professional movers returned Patnode’s painting in a climate-controlled truck. He said he found level of care amusing given the painting’s origin in the windy, sandy conditions of Mitchell Beach.

“It’s wonderful to see it again,” said Patnode. “I’m not sure where it’s going next. I’m pretty much open to all possibilities.”

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Xiomaro November 9, 2012 at 02:16 am
I've seen the painting and agree that it's a beautiful piece. I hope it finds another location where it can be enjoyed by an even larger audience.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sue P. June 18, 2013 at 02:55 pm
You can fool some of the people some of the time but you can't fool all of the people when they haveRead More Kathleen Mitchell looking out for them. This is just sickening how with all the evidence that Kathleen has provided that Jeff Smith is not suspended as of today. The arrogance of this entire administration is beyond belief. I want to know what the Mayor has to say about this and I also would like to hear from Macrino, Hyslop and Passero.
citygirl June 19, 2013 at 07:04 am
I suggested this idea at least 6 months ago- watching the city council meetings over time I thoughtRead More "how arrogant this guy is"- he doesn't feel our pain so he probably doesn't live in NL- someone should have caught onto this a couple of years ago- Again I say, if you want to work for the city of NL you MUST live in the city of NL- otherwise you really don't care what happens here- you're not really invested in our city- you can't take a paycheck and run to a nice suburban town where taxes are lower than NL-
Mark Felt June 19, 2013 at 07:14 am
This is very clear Jeff Smith is a liar! Either he lied about living in New London, or he lied onRead More his political contribution forms. Does it really matter when or about what he lied? NO he is still a liar. Jeff Smith apparently has registered to vote in New London yet his vehicle is registered in Windham, state law dictates that he has 30 days to change his registration to his town of residence. Jeff Smith has no respect for the laws of this state. Which is true the car registration or the voter registration? Jeff smith is in violation of the law either way. The city council president was made aware of this when Kathleen spoke to the council. What will council president Passero do about this? Nothing is the talk around town. Passero is taking his marching orders from the mayor, the mayor likes Jeff Smith, he will spin the numbers however the mayor tells him. Passero has no choice he has made his deal with the devil. Jeff Smith is the person with his hands on the money in the city and he is not an honest man! The saga of the Whaling City gets worse and worse.