.
Feedback

Mayoral Candidate Proposes Alternative For Coast Guard Academy Expansion

Lori Hopkins-Cavanagh suggests use of Housing Authority parcel for additional campus buildings

Independent mayoral candidate Lori Hopkins-Cavanagh is suggesting that several hot-button issues can be addressed if the obtains a parcel of land currently occupied by subsidized housing.

In a letter to the academy’s superintendent, Rear Admiral Sandra L. Stosz, Hopkins-Cavanagh said such an action will result in the preservation of , reconnection of New London neighborhoods, and demolition of the high-rise Thames River Apartments. Hopkins-Cavanagh said this will result in safer neighborhoods and allow the academy to expand its campus, as it is hoping to do by purchasing a portion of Riverside Park from the city. This item will go to a referendum vote in the November election.

“Riverside Park is more valuable as open space to enhance the beauty of the academy and welcome visitors for tailgate parties and events. The park does not need to be behind your gates to benefit the Coast Guard,” said Hopkins-Cavanagh in her letter to Stolsz. “It does need to be beautified by the city and safe for everyone to enjoy.”

Hopkins-Cavanagh says about 24 acres of contiguous land across from the park’s entrance is owned by the city or the . She said the high-rises are located on 15 acres of the land and that the academy could locate a sports complex, diversity center, and recruitment center on the site after the apartments are demolished. She said this would increase the academy’s visibility, create jobs and an aesthetically pleasing entryway into the city, lower crime rates, increase property values, revitalize the Hodges Square neighborhood, and help to create a connection between downtown New London and the northern neighborhoods.

"The proposal will be a stabilizing factor, especially if the USCG drives/marches through the park daily to access the sport/diversity/recruitment development," Hopkins-Cavanagh said in an e-mail. "However, there are many variations that can be considered."

New London Housing Authority executive director Sue Shontell said at a that the department is applying for a Department of Housing and Urban Development grant to plan the overhaul of the high-rises. Shontell said two of the towers would be removed, with a third retained for social services, while a public housing neighborhood would be created nearby with amenities such as walking paths and a transportation hub. Hopkins-Cavanagh said she disagrees with the plan, favoring relocating residents of the high-rises to existing subsidized housing.  

“Ms. Shontell’s plan is the wrong plan for East New London and the academy. Your neighborhood will deteriorate even more and the academy will be located in a sea of subsidized apartments with transient renters,” she wrote in her letter to Stolsz. “Your neighborhood will become increasingly less safe for cadets and Coast Guard personnel. Drug activity and violent crime is already a problem and it will only get worse.”

Hopkins-Cavanagh said the idea would not be as simple as the sale of a portion of Riverside Park, but would create more advantages for the academy and city. She said a 1998 feasibility study determined that the high-rise property was not large enough to build a sports complex or shopping mall, but that it did not take into account contiguous parcels of land or the academy as a potential developer.

Kathleen Mitchell September 6, 2011 at 10:08 pm
In fact, you are wrong, Russ.
The Academy did, indeed, on a recent Friday evening open the side gate between their campus and Riverside Park and drag in, not one, but two dumpsters loaded with metal and other construction material. This was observed and video-taped by neighbors walking in the park and a police report was made. This dumping in the park by the CGA was not the first time it occured but it was the first time they were caught in the act, so to speak. The good news is that the dumpsters were removed after the police were called.
Wayne Vendetto September 6, 2011 at 11:23 pm
Personally, I have no issues with the Academy other than their desire to take the park. If in fact the CGA does wish to relocate, I would suggest that it will not be based on their in ability to acquire 9 more acres. First they would need to find a community willing and most importantly able to take in hundreds of acres of valuable land off of their tax roles. In the event such community is found, the U.S. Senate and Congress would have to appropriate billions of dollars to acquire such property and build the required infrastructure. I hardly doubt all this would occur over 9 acres. Especially, when there is room for expansion on the campus as it sits now. That being said, the City of New London has been and will continue to be an excellent host to the CGA. Please do not forget, that it was the City of New London that provided the land for them in the first place. Not once, but at three different times during the lifetime of the present school. This did/does not come at no expense to the citizens of New London, as none of that property can ever be taxed, and the City provides many services to them, fire and water to name just a few.
Wayne Vendetto September 6, 2011 at 11:25 pm
inability
Fr. Russ Carmichael September 7, 2011 at 10:20 am
Well, Wayne, there are all ready and have been for some time discussions going on about the move; just like moving the base which is up again for closing in Groton. There are many place that have the needed space; they contribute more in revenue than land tax through employment contract and water fees...
Fr. Russ Carmichael September 7, 2011 at 10:26 am
@Kathleen Mitchell, I do not believe on thing you are saying; unless gates where open to remove the dumpsters from a certain area; but to accuse the Guars of "dumping in the Park" is beyond lunacy...
Elissa Bass (Editor) September 7, 2011 at 11:22 am
Hey everyone: Regional Editor here. If posters continue their trend of turning every discussion attached to an article into a series of personal attacks - there are many ways to disagree with someone without calling them or their ideas "stupid" etc. - then those posters will lose their permissions to comment on Patch. We love how involved everyone is on New London Patch, but this gets tiresome for other readers, the grade-school-level insults. There are several participants who are equally guilty. So, stick to the issues, disagree without name calling or denigrating, and continue to work (together or separately) toward a better New London. Have a great day.
Clark van der Lyke September 7, 2011 at 01:07 pm
Probably a hundred people came to clean the 9/11 garden at the Lyman Allyn Museum after the storm. Coast Guard, Girl Scouts, Police, Firemen and women and neighbors. No free hotdogs or basketball to lure them there either. Open to the public and come and join the services on 9/11. Coast Guard band will probably be there and everybody can take a look at what a well maintained park can look like. Want to see a bigger one...Connecticut College Arboretum, also free to the public. Oops...no hoops! Hey Elissa, what do you want? Your readers are filling up dead space space for you, they will be sending photos next or doing TV reviews.
Wayne Vendetto September 7, 2011 at 03:38 pm
Clark, that is a great turn out, and for a very worthy cause. I would also note, that the last clean up at Riverside,drew the same numbers. It just goes to show that the people of New London do have heart, and will rally for important causes. The Arboretum is a great example of a quasi public facility. What a great idea it would be for those types of partnerships to expand to other areas of the City!
Wayne Vendetto September 7, 2011 at 03:47 pm
There will be another clean up at Riverside Park, this Sat, 9/10, If you would care to expand on your community service.
Cara Hatfield September 9, 2011 at 11:07 pm
Lori: As a former city employee in charge of the community development division, I must point out that you are 100% incorrect in your assertion that the City's lead abatement grant funds are going "unused because the government screwed up the allocation of this money to only those who will never use it". I am not even sure exactly what you mean by that statement but you have been misinformed. When I left that position early this year, that grant program exceeded all benchmarks and were ahead of the timelines set for expending those funds. Also, you state that you are "Lead Certified" but do you mean that you are certified to do lead inspections/risk assessments or have you completed training to be a Lead Worker or Supervisor to actually conduct the lead abatement work, or have you gone through training to be certified in EPA's Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule? There are other ways "Lead Certified" can be interpreted/defined...
Lori Hopkins Cavanagh September 10, 2011 at 12:37 am
Tambria: If the Coast Guard takes away the only public open space in East New London and Sue Shontell expands the amount of subsidized rental housing East New London is doomed. More crime, more poverty and more absentee landlords. I guarantee this is the future. New London will continue to decline until someone takes the lead and preserves, stabilizes and encourages home ownership and lead abatement of the many historic multi-families in this neighborhood. That is what I offer and that is what I know is true in my heart and mind. I am sorry if you disagree.
Lori Hopkins Cavanagh September 10, 2011 at 12:41 am
Well, I can only try my hardest to open closed minds and pray that the Coast Guard will rise above this isolationist attitude for the betterment of this precious historic neighborhood.
Lori Hopkins Cavanagh September 10, 2011 at 12:49 am
Jean:
Please lets us sit down together and talk. Anyone who knows me and about how I grew up knows that I do not have a racist bone in my body. I am, however, a hard working realist, preservationist and neighborhood advocate. I know a lot about New London's neighborhoods and I care deeply about our youth. However, I do not stick my head in the sand because there are no solutions without sun. I treat everyone the same. I do not care who is rich or poor, I care about who needs help and who is soaking the system. New London cannot sustain the instability and issues created b y an overwhelming rental population. This is fact. Absentee landlords are making a killing on section 8 housing. This housing used to be for families that did not make enough money to afford a single family home or who had extended family living in multis. That is sadly not the case. Now, New York drug dealers have safe haven and are destroying our youth. I know this is true. My position is to balance our city so that our youth are not destroyed on the streets as they succumb to peer pressure, gangs and thugs.
Lori Hopkins Cavanagh September 10, 2011 at 12:50 am
Thank you Varnaud. Drugs, thugs and gangs are issues that will only grow and steal our youth's potential unless the housing issues are addressed.
Lori Hopkins Cavanagh September 10, 2011 at 12:52 am
I suggest you ask that question of other municipalities that have no low income, moderate income and absent of any income housing. At over 63% rentals, New London cannot sustain itself.
Lori Hopkins Cavanagh September 10, 2011 at 01:01 am
Ken: In my conversation with Ms. Shontell, she asked me,"Wre are we going to put these people?" asked her, "Where do they want to go?" I guess I would really like to know who these folks are and what they want. Not from Sue Shontell's mouth, but from their mouths. That is how I can best serve these residents. Ms. Shontell is their landlord and does not speak for them. Ms. Shontell represents the Federal Government and not New London. I have no special interest here other than to preserve an historic and vital neighborhood for the benefit of all residents in East New London and the City as a whole.
Tambria Moore September 10, 2011 at 01:02 am
Lori, please site what peer reviewed study you are using that correlates rental housing, either subsidized or not with crime, more poverty and more absentee landlords. In this day and age many of my professional peers do not wish the burden of home ownership, and we are neither criminals, nor have absentee landlords, nor have added to poverty. Following divorce when my children were small, we had to rely for a time on subsidized housing, it was that opportunity which allowed me to pursue education and career advancement, moving me out of poverty and out of unsafe neighborhoods. I found subsidized two-family housing in Norwich safer than the unsubsidized neighborhoods. I also know that criminals live in owner occupied housing as well as rentals. In order to be subsidized, a rental must be maintained or loose its status. So that would seem to logically require an attentive landlord. Were the landlord to let the housing decline, there are enforcement measures that can be used. Some of those measures New London should have used with the old school high rises here protect its investment and the tenants within.
Tambria Moore September 10, 2011 at 01:11 am
Municipalities that have no low income, moderate income and absent of any income housing are the same municipalities that are creating the problem of higher percentages of transient homeless here, if there is such a thing. Do you intend to make us a cause rather than a solution of the bigger problem of causing humanity to be without any safe, decent affordable housing as Mayor?
Tambria Moore September 10, 2011 at 01:18 am
Lori, on your website "The International Shops are an ideal way to capitalize on New London's rich multi-cultural community, create jobs and stimulate tourism." But if you drive out our rentors, how rich multi-cultural community do you imagine we will be. Please find me municipalities in CT with no low, moderate or zero income housing that are rich multi-cultural community. Perhaps you should define rich multi-cultural community
Kathleen Mitchell September 10, 2011 at 01:23 am
Tambria-I was on my way into my living room to watch the Yankees beat the whatever out of the Orioles when I decided to check my email and noticed your comment in the updates.
I think you are the first person to mention a very serious, but too often ignored, problem in our city-the lack of enforcement of our existing zoning regulations which have contributed significantly to sub-standard housing in New London. Obviously, the people most impacted by this failure are the residents who are also vulnerable and suffering the affects of neglect by our city in other areas of their lives including employment and other opportunities. Morally, and in many other ways, I see little value in a wholesale move of the less fortunate among us to supposedly make life better for a different segment of our society.
Tambria Moore September 10, 2011 at 01:28 am
You're right, some Realtors, more so now in this economy, enjoy profits from rental mgmt. and referrals, but Lori has always been primarily focused in sales which bring a higher commission than any rental would in this municipality.
Tambria Moore September 10, 2011 at 01:33 am
Lori, as you are knowledgeable about lead, you know that even low lead exposure poisoning - below even the legal reportable limit and primarily from environmental exposure to children in their own homes, increases delinquent, violent, criminal behaviors, and decreases success in school, work etc. I would think cleaning up the existing housing stock would be more of a focus than worrying about whether it is rented or owner occupied.
Tambria Moore September 10, 2011 at 01:39 am
"Absentee landlords are making a killing on section 8 housing. This housing used to be for families that did not make enough money to afford a single family home or who had extended family living in multis. That is sadly not the case. Now, New York drug dealers have safe haven and are destroying our youth. I know this is true." if you know it, report it. HUD has a zero tolerance policy. NLPD would be happy to intervene. The NLPD arrests, and they hit the streets again days later. To imply that NY drug dealers have a safe haven here implies a problem with the criminal justice system - a state and federal issue. Call in the feds, Lori. If you can point to a home with interstate trafficking of drugs, they will get involved.
Tambria Moore September 10, 2011 at 01:47 am
Section 8 was created in the Great Depression due to substandard housing to increase the production of low-income housing and to help families pay their rent, I don't think one can find any studies identifying the number of criminals housed during that time by the program. But then, as now, depressed economy or recessed economy, crimes rose and I would reasonably guess the Section 8 program also put a roof over a the heads of a few noteworthy criminals then too.
Tambria Moore September 10, 2011 at 01:49 am
Also back then the govt acted with far more capacity as the landlord and kept up the maintenance of the structure.
Tambria Moore September 10, 2011 at 01:54 am
I think you are thinking about the 1937 housing program that was more of a jobs creation and construction program to save the middle class, that was a predecessor, but was not Section 8
Tambria Moore September 10, 2011 at 01:56 am
I like rental to ownership programs, myself. Ones that promote education and building up the individual and the family and letting them remain in the structure to eventually buy it - if they want to.
Tambria Moore September 10, 2011 at 02:13 am
When I lived in public housing the first thing I did was align myself with other activists. We started a food pantry, adult ed classes, job training, and brought together other community resources on site. I can tell you tenants don't trust PHA's for good reason. And because of that distrust, having a PHA host anything such as a job fair is typically not that successful. It smacks of paternal oversight. But you could host one for the tenants off site, or the tenants can host one if they have an activist there * remember we activists are rare breeds and you can't always find one with passion AND time AND commitment AND the minimal support of the PHA (though that is not required at all). Or if they have formed a powerful tenant association as we did. I know Kathleen has wanted to jump into it.
Tambria Moore September 10, 2011 at 02:37 am
I think the Hodges Square is an example of bad urban planning and govt. It used to be you put 50 percent down and had five years to pay it off, then programs pushed people into purchasing lesser valued homes in the city centers and whites into higher priced homes in the suburbs via the cheaper FHA, and construction of highways cut off urban centers and took people away from the Maloves and the 5 and dimes. I imagine here, as in my home state laws segregated even your parents, Lori. I've read some of these old contracts that segregated race, religion, ethnicity. Zoning changes allowed doctors to move their offices to residential neighborhoods closer to the hospital, instead of downtown. Strip Malls like Buscetto built were cookie cuttered across the byways. The social construction of racialized space or "vertical ghettos" didn't help. Those historical single family homes became multi family rentals to save lives with income they generated. Some were constructed from the get go as boarding homes, as my mother's was. Those virgin landlords and their heirs were the buyers who went to the suburbs built on farmlands and forests. Or the time shares. Or the Keys. Who created the Hodges Squares of today. This city has been on this track for its lifetime.
Fr. Russ Carmichael September 10, 2011 at 08:13 am
Thank you Tambria....

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Scotty B June 19, 2013 at 08:02 pm
Geez Mr Mayor. Looks like you need some more cops! Instead the cops are leaving at an alarming rateRead More because of the lack of leadership and your threats of lay offs!
joy orlando June 19, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://www.windham.k12.ct.us/downloads/co/Financial_Director_Posting.pdf...and there's a job closeRead More to where he lives just waiting for him!
Kathleen Mitchell June 19, 2013 at 02:43 pm
This is the link to the post I wrote the other day Where'd You Say Jeff Lives?Read More http://newlondon.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/whered-you-say-jeff-lives
Scotty B June 19, 2013 at 08:06 pm
Full investigation! If Mr smith hasn't moved to NL yet, he doesn't plan to. Just another pocketRead More padder like Bernie welch , Berliner, Rose...
Scotty B June 19, 2013 at 08:14 pm
Funny how very other week the mayor had a press conference.. All these issues coming to light and noRead More word from the mayor!?
William Desmond June 19, 2013 at 08:02 am
The mayor and council president will lie and cheat to protect the mayor's unqualified and dishonestRead More people. The council and the council leadership is supposed to act as a check and balance in this new form of government. Mr. Smith is one of those dishonest people. It is sad that this person can be so dishonest and that the so called leaders in the community back the dishonest person rather than standing up for the taxpayers and people that really do live here and pay taxes. As a finance director Mr. Smith knows the importance of the proper tax town for vehicles, so he cannot claim ignorance. Is he is breaking the law because the taxes in Windham are lower or because he truly lives in Windham?
William Desmond June 19, 2013 at 09:03 am
And at the same time they are kenneling a dog that could be placed. What a waste. See the info andRead More contact the mayor go to http://newlondonpoliceunion.com contact the mayor ASAP by email dfinizio@ci.new-london.ct.us and by phone 860-447-5201 and demand that he Give BUCK HIS MEDS! & Give Bessie a home!
Kenneth R. Lewis June 19, 2013 at 11:26 am
http://theday.com/article/20130619/NWS01/306199963/1018 Seems that DECD Commissioner CatherineRead More Smith gives the state the same type of answers that Jeff Smith gives New London city council. Are they related?