.
Feedback

Mayor Announces Reorganization Of NLDC

New London Development Corporation’s name and mission will change, president will step down; executive order bars organization from using eminent domain

The will undergo a number of changes over the next year, including a change in leadership and mission.

Mayor Daryl Finizio announced Tuesday that the NLDC’s name will be changed to the Renaissance City Development Association. He said the change will also include updates, revisions, and expansions of the organization’s strategic plan and mission statement. It will remain a community-based not-for-profit organization.

Finizio also said Michael W. Joplin, who is currently president of the NLDC, will step down at the end of the year. He will be replaced by Linda Mariani, a New London resident and the organization’s secretary.

“The reorganization of NLDC into the new RCDA, along with the personnel and administrative policy changes announced today, represents the end of an era in New London’s development history,” said Finizio.

Executive order on eminent domain

Along with this change, Finizio announced his fifth executive order. This declares that the power of eminent domain rests solely with the city and not any other agency or corporation. It also says Finizio’s administration believes “that the use of eminent domain should be limited only to situations where the city shall directly and expressly use the property acquired for a public use” and that it is “the intention of the mayor, on behalf of the city of New London, to apologize to all those adversely affected by the City’s past use of eminent domain.”

The order states that the administration “shall not propose or support any legislation to the City Council that shall provide for the use of eminent domain for any project, unless said project provides that the city shall directly use the real property proposed to be acquired.” It says that in terms of economic development projects, the administration “shall strive to treat all private property within the city equally regarding its potential use for an economic development project regardless of any class or financial status of the owner(s).”

Fort Trumbull development

River Bank Construction of Westport has proposed the construction of the “Village on the Thames,” a group of 99 residential units and one commercial building on four parcels at the Fort Trumbull peninsula. The project received in December, and the City Council recently approved a in a development agreement with the NLDC to refer to them as “common interest ownership units.”

John Brooks, a Fort Trumbull development consultant with the NLDC, said the change will not affect the project. River Bank Construction is currently continuing work on the design of the project and seeking financing.

In addition, the has proposed a number of development initiatives for Fort Trumbull, including improved access to the peninsula and the construction of a hotel, cultural site, and pedestrian footbridge to downtown New London. Finizio said the RCDA revisions will incorporate these recommendations, and that the transition in leadership will also “address the title of properties that comprise the municipal development area at Fort Trumbull to insure the rights of the city of New London are protected.”

Finizio said the revisions will also incorporate proposals for green technology, an initiative he has advocated for Fort Trumbull.

“The city will move forward directing its new development agency to act upon a green-integrated development plan for the Fort Trumbull peninsula that incorporates the work of the Yale Urban Design Group,” he said.

Leadership changes

During his campaign, Finizio initially said he opposed eminent domain but favored cooperation with the NLDC rather than disbanding the organization, saying it would be too costly of a legal fight. However, he later after River Bank Construction’s —and the —a tax abatement, saying he felt NLDC was proceeding with poor decisions.

Zak Leavy, Finizio’s executive assistant, said the reorganization of the NLDC into the RCDA fulfills the promise.

“NLDC in name, in leadership, and in mission has been effectively abolished,” said Leavy. “The policies of the city of New London have fundamentally changed. By law, the city of New London must have a development agency but the RCDA will be an agency under new leadership, a new name, and a new mission. The mayor is particularly pleased that the leadership of the RCDA will be held by New London residents.”

Leavy said additional departures and additions from the organization’s board of directors will be announced during the transition. The changes are expected to go into effect at the NLDC’s annual meeting in April.

Mariani, an attorney with , said in a statement that she was pleased with the change.

“As a native and current resident of New London, it is a great honor to serve the city in this capacity,” she said.

NLDC response

John S. Johnson, second vice president of the NLDC, said he considers the name change appropriate. He said the organization has had a bad image since the use of eminent domain at Fort Trumbull, but noted that this action was upheld on the legal level up through the Supreme Court case of Kelo v. City of New London.

“I think after he became our mayor he realized that NLDC does serve an important function, that it has accomplished a number of things,” said Johnson.

Johnson said he also considered that Finizio is trying to localize the organization.

“We’ve changed the form of management of the city, and quite frankly the mayor is the boss,” said Johnson. “And I think he is looking to have people involved in NLDC who are probably more involved with the city of New London in terms of where you live and all the rest of it.”

Frank McLaughlin, chairman of NLDC’s House New London neighborhood revitalization program, will continue in this capacity and also serve as project manager for the RCDA. McLaughlin said he thinks the “Village on the Thames” as well as the almost total occupancy of a commercial building at One Chelsea Street are helping attract inquiries about Fort Trumbull development.

“I have a very positive outlook,” said McLaughlin. “I’m a positive person to begin with, and I’m enthused about New London and very enthused about the Village on the Thames.”

Joplin said in a statement that he was also happy to see the townhouse proposal making progress.

“It has been a great honor to serve the NLDC, but it is time to move on and I am happy to be stepping down as the River Bank project breaks ground,” he said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.