.
Feedback

Health And Wellness Groups Support Municipal Smoking Ban

Public Welfare Committee hears input on proposal to bar smoking from parks and city entrances

A at New London parks, beaches, and within 30 feet of the entrances to municipal buildings earned support from some representatives of health and wellness organizations on Monday.

ACHIEVE New London, an organization promoting improved health in the city, and the New London Community and Campus Coalition, whose goal is to prevent which substance abuse among the city’s youth, are spearheading the effort. The groups say several Connecticut towns have already banned smoking in parks, including Groton, Montville, and Norwich.

Bruce Cummings, chief executive officer of , told the Public Welfare Committee that smoking is a major contributor to heart disease. He said the hospital recently implemented its own no smoking policy at the hospital campus.

“I think this would be another step forward in contributing to the health of the city of New London’s residents,” he said.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Nancy Baude, a member of the Parks and Recreation Commission, said smoking can also lead to the problem of cigarette butt litter. She said toddlers can pick these up and put them in their mouths if they find them at the park or beach.

“People don’t realize, they think it’s a harmless thing. It’s not harmless,” said Baude.

Keith Robbins opposed the ban, saying he think it will make smokers less likely to visit businesses and sites in New London. Robbins said he has smoked cigars while visiting parks, but does so away from other people. He also said he considers that no legislation will effectively eliminate litter issues and that it was “ludicrous” that the city was considering a ban on smoking in outdoor areas.

“Smoke outside is easily avoidable,” he said.

Tony Mollica, community coordinator for the New London Community and Campus Coalition, disagreed. Mollica said it is not easy for people to avoid interaction with cigarette smoke if someone is smoking in a public place.

“You can be at a park or a playground, and you can smell that smoke from 50 yards away,” he said. “It’s not something you can just move away from.”

Councilor Anthony Nolan said he supported having the full City Council vote on the proposal. He said he would be willing to consider having designated smoking areas at these sites, but said he was also concerned with the issues raised by the groups.

“The majority of the smokers I have run into are not as courteous as you are,” he told Robbins.

Council President Pro Tempore Wade Hyslop said the city has passed several ordinances that are not enforced. He also said smoking is already banned within municipal buildings and that this could potentially be extended to areas around entrances.

“I think one of the things we often try to do is legislate people’s morals…I know we mean well when we do that, but sometimes we infringe upon others,” said Hyslop.

The Parks and Recreation Commission recommended a no smoking policy for New London parks in September of 2010. The measure before the City Council’s Education, Parks and Recreation Committee last year, with opponents saying they felt the measure compromise personal liberties.

Councilor Marie Friess-McSparran, chair of the committee, said the organizations presented the Montville ordinance as a model. She said she will work on drafting an ordinance for the committee to consider.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 10:01 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:52 pm
And what I meant by that comment that I don't think this whole thing has anything to do withRead More t-shirt , it's just a shutout to the Mayer and what he is bringing to the table .
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:50 pm
We are young we like change and we like a good laugh that's all the t- shirt is ,
--Robert May 23, 2013 at 03:15 am
Pathetic that anyone would post this as a legit news story, more so that it seems a big corporationRead More is behind these ads.
Jason Morris May 22, 2013 at 01:30 pm
Jessica's previous two posts in other city's patch pages, with the exact same title (just schoolRead More district name changed) have been moderated/deleted. Recommend this corporate advertisement to get the same fate. The concerns are true, but it's an ad nontheless.
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 09:59 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 09:57 am
@Josh: Too much tolerance is also a slippery slope. Like it or not, Zak is a public servant, whichRead More makes him automatically subject to scrutiny of his actions by the public. We can and should speak out when our public servants (elected or graciously appointed in Zak's case) - ESPECIALLLY ones that are supposed to be emissaries to the Capitol - engage in behavior that could cast a bad light on our community. Would you be ok with Obama wearing a shirt that says "America hates you"?
Joshua Pendleton May 22, 2013 at 06:44 pm
Love the shirt or hate it, it is Zacs right to wear what he wants, when he wants to. Democracy isRead More founded on tolerance. This tolerance includes public officials hanging out in their back yard. Intolerance of things of this nature is a slippery slope.
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 03:40 pm
I would say that the Collective Bargaining Agreement would have to be looked at for his Union.Read More Mr. Hathaway is not in Local 1378. He is MEU. I would say, that this is an interesting question for our members. Local 1378's CBA does not go into this language, however it does state that prior to reorganization, the union must be notified to bargain the impacts (not exact language). This is not to say that the union has final say, or say at all as to how the administration shall operate, but the impact to the employees is what matters as well as the position in general. I will look into this language in reference to the Charter and forward it to the MEU as well. Thank you.
Kathleen Mitchell May 22, 2013 at 03:17 pm
The following is from NL's Charter, Sec 46. Does it mean that Bill Hathaway would be entitled to aRead More public hearing? "...Any officer or employee so removed, suspended, laid off or reduced in grade shall, if he so request, be furnished with a written statement of the reason therefor, be allowed a reasonable time for answering such reasons in writing and be given a public hearing by the officer making such removal, suspension, lay-off or reduction in grade, before the order therefor shall be made final..."
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
I have not seen any details other than word of mouth at this time in reference to more being addedRead More to the pension plan after two years. I would not be surprised. This would be another instance in which the charter was violated and would have to be mentioned to the Admin. Committee. I would be willing to gamble that they were put into the employee pension plan as well.
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.