.
Feedback

Fire, Police Departments Seek To Put Faces To Numbers [VIDEO]

Members of New London public safety departments rally at City Hall to protest proposed layoffs

Union representatives from the and rallied outside on Tuesday, criticizing a set of as an unnecessary action based on anticipated overtime costs.

Under the $83,092,657 city and school budget proposed for the 2013 fiscal year, the fire department proposed 25 layoffs while leaving an additional five positions vacant. The police department proposed the termination of 10 officers while leaving 11 positions vacant.

Mayor Daryl Finizio requested $12,280,651 for the police department and $8,834,931 for the fire department. The Finance Committee , respectively, and the departments were also included in an additional two percent cut across the board approved by the City Council.

The employees who may be laid off received their layoff notices from Finizio’s office in the mail over the weekend. These were set to go into effect on June 30, the end of the current fiscal year.

Editor’s note: at the City Council’s vote on the third reading of the budget, councilors voted to transfer funds to the fire and police departments in order to provide funding to avoid layoffs.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Rocco Basilica, president of the New London Fire Fighters Local 1522, said he believes the department is adequately funded under the City Council appropriation to maintain staffing levels without layoffs. He compared the department’s staffing level and response time to neighboring communities.

“That staffing is what saves lives,” said Basilica.

Jonathan Paige, vice president of the firefighters’ union, said the most experienced firefighter who would be laid off has been with the department for 14 years. He said reducing the size of the department would have a detrimental effect on public safety.

“I’m completely shocked,” said Paige. “This money is in the budget. And I’m still baffled as to the reason for these cuts.”

Chuck Flynn, a member of the New London Police Union AFSCME Local 724 executive board, said the vacancies and layoffs would all affect the patrol division. He also said the calculated layoffs were based on estimates of what the overtime levels will be.

“We don’t believe that the finances are as bad as they’re being projected…This is an argument over future overtime,” said Flynn.

Darrin O’Mara, a member of the executive board of the police union, said six other departments offered to take in any fired officers in lateral transfers. O’Mara said that few officers returned after a round of layoffs in the early 90s, and that layoffs result in the department having to pay for the training and hiring of new officers in the future.

“It’s disappointing that the city is taking this tactic or this approach,” said O’Mara. “I feel you’re using leverage, and putting 10 officers’ jobs at risk when the City Council says there’s money in the budget.”

David McElroy, vice president of the police union, said he thinks part of the reason for projected high overtime costs is the result of the and . He said he believes the money is available for both the deputy chief as well as the current staffing levels.

“We just want the public to be aware that the decision to possibly lay off these 10 officers is really going to hamper public safety,” he said.

Michael Lax, a police officer who has been on the force since February of 2011, said he was shocked to receive a layoff notice. Lax said the department is already below its ideal staffing level with the vacancies.

“The City Council’s on our side. Obviously the union’s on our side,” said Lax. “I hope the city can talk to the union and get some agreements with the mayor.”

Samul said the department has been referring to the day Finizio announced the layoffs as “Black Thursday.”

“There’s never, ever in over 20 years been layoffs in the New London Fire Department,” said Samul. “That’s very concerning to us.”

Several members of the fire department who would be have been terminated if the layoffs were approved appealed to the City Council at the start of their meeting. Vernon Skau, a fire inspector, said his termination would have an effect on building inspections and obtaining grants.

“There is not one single person in this 25 that wants to work anywhere but New London,” said Skau.

Kevin Campbell questioned why he and other firefighters would receive pink slips when the city has approved deputy chiefs’ positions in each department.

“To say I feel betrayed is an understatement,” he said.

Jack Tackling, who said he would be the last firefighter laid off if the reductions were approved, said he did not believe the department should be appealing for their jobs.

“It shouldn’t happen,” said Tackling. “Someone’s going to die. Someone’s going to get hurt, all right? Live on that.”

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jason Morris May 21, 2013 at 03:33 pm
The issue is moot - he has the city's seal tattooed on his arm for crying out load. It's obviouslyRead More in jest, and too many people simply needed "something" to boil over about...yes, the truth does hurt.
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 21, 2013 at 08:57 am
Yes. That is correct. The city has been putting unqualified people into the employees DefinedRead More Pension without following the proper process of placing the requests into the Pension Committee.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?