.
Feedback

Finizio Outlines Five Percent Reduction Proposals At First Budget Forum

Mayor supports New London budget for fiscal year 2013, which includes a 7.5 percent tax rate increase

Mayor Daryl Finizio held the first of 14 planned public hearings on the 2013 fiscal year municipal budget on Thursday, discussing the budget process and reductions that might be made if the budget is defeated at a referendum vote.

Finizio said significant cuts have been made from his and that 91 percent of the increase would cover lost revenues or past overestimates, with the remaining nine percent representing mandated expenditures toward debt service.

“The cuts that you’ve been seeing are not cuts that are trying to lower the existing tax rate,” said Finizio. “They are cuts to meet this tax rate.”

Following a lengthy budget process, the City Council approved a for the 2013 fiscal year in a June 19 vote. The council also approved a 7.5 percent increase to the mill rate, or tax per $1,000 of assessed value, raising it from 25.31 to 27.22. A total of 19 municipal positions were cut in this budget

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

A petition effort gathered enough signatures to . Residents will decide whether the measures should stand in a .

Five percent reduction

Finizio presented reductions that could be made if the budget is defeated at referendum and one is prepared bringing the mill rate to 26.58, or a 2.5 percent increase. The City Council was aiming for a two percent tax increase during budget deliberations.

Finizio said the following reductions in services could occur under the proposal:

  • Having residential trash and recycling pickup occur every other week instead of every week, reducing mechanical services for emergency vehicles, and eliminating the building division in the
  • Suspending upgrades, having no on-call technicians, and leaving a senior analyst position vacant in Information Technology
  • Suspending grant writing requests and potentially cutting the department head and building officials in the
  • Eliminating a records technician and reducing office hours at the

Finizio said the city would also have to prioritize its needs, and that he considered on-call IT technicians to be necessary. He said if this service is not available, computer issues—including those in public safety systems—could only be addressed during business hours.

“If we have to choose between police IT…versus cutting the subsidy to the library, we may cut the subsidy to the library,” said Finizio.

Finizio said the city could also consider reductions to the , , and . He said any cuts would be made in consultation with the City Council if the proposed budget is defeated at referendum.

Budget as proposed

Finizio said there was a “tremendous amount of disorganization in how the city’s finances were being run” when he took office. He said these included underfunded budgets, frequent transfers from account to account, reduced revenues from the state, and a decreased general fund.

“We were doing more with stagnant tax streams and a depleting fund balance,” said Finizio.

Cost savings measures put into place as part of the budget process included:

  • Department of Public Works: , elimination of seasonal employees, a , reduced hours at the transfer station, and scaled-back curbside pickups.
  • Mayor’s office: reduction of salaries, including bringing the office manager’s wage from $70,000 to $52,000; and consolidation with the duties with the chief administrative officer with no additional compensation; and elimination of expense accounts. Finizio said the office’s budget is $57,000 less than the last city manager’s annual budget.
  • Elimination of two positions in Information Technology and foregoing replacement of aging servers.
  • Salary and staff reductions and the elimination of the NIP-IT code enforcement team in the Office of Development and Planning.

Finizio said the Finance Department has added a PDF document to the city website on Thursday (see attached) updating department by department budget information, and that more information will be added soon. He said he calculated that the proposed tax increase will cost the average homeowner between 69 cents and $1.05 a day, and that cutting it five percent will save between 22 cents and 36 cents per day, respectively.

“I believe that approving this budget stabilizes us, but no, it is not the end,” said Finizio. “Even in this year we may have to make additional cuts as the budget goes along to make sure we don’t run a deficit.”

Public response

Larry Hample said his assessment has increased 750 percent in the time he has owned the property in the city. He said he considered the assessments in New London to be unfair as a whole.

“When will people in town understand that? We don’t have any more money to give,” said Hample.

Finizio said New London assessments are less than comparable properties in neighboring towns. He said he believes the property tax system is outdated and that he would prefer that it be based on ability to pay.

“The city of New London can’t change the property tax system…It’s an unfair tax. Everybody has my sympathy on that,” he said.

Dr. George Sprecace, a former member of the City Council and Board of Education, said he would be willing to support the proposed budget on one condition: that the city conduct a forensic audit to analyze any fiduciary negligence or malfeasance in the past five years.

“I do think we have to make sure that we are starting from the right origin, otherwise it’s garbage in, garbage out,” said Sprecace.

Finizio replied that he would support a forensic audit, but that he has not pushed for one because he thinks the has identified where the main issues are and the city is able to focus on solutions for the future. He said the City Council would need to appropriate the funds for such an audit.

“If the council passes it, I will not stand in the way,” said Finizio.

The council has considered a forensic audit but not approved the measure. Finance Director Jeff Smith opposed such an audit, saying it would cost an estimated $2 million and focus on uncovering malfeasance. He said regular audits have identified a pattern of budgeting he described as “foolish but not criminal.”

Frank McLaughlin said the city should look toward consolidation and regionalization to improve the efficiency of spending in the city. He said an provided one example of cost-saving initiatives.

“I think there are opportunities in government for reorganization,” he said.

The next budget forum will take place at 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday at .

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!