.
Feedback

Finizio Orders Hanging Of New London Main Street Banners

Mayor orders Department of Public Works to put up OpSail 2012 decorations for business organization, but says planners must account for city costs in the future

Making an exception to an , Mayor Daryl Finizio said 55 banners purchased by for OpSail 2012 should be put up. However, Finizio also cautioned that organizers must be willing to foot the bill for such services in the future.

“Owing to the importance of OpSail to the city of New London, and the state of Connecticut, I have today directed the to hang New London Main Street’s OpSail banners through the city,” Finizio said. “On this matter, the administration also wishes to respect the views of the City Council and nurture our co-operative working relationship.”

Penny Parsekian, chief executive officer of New London Main Street, welcomed the news.

“I’m thrilled,” she said. “I really am, because the banners really add something in terms of how the area and downtown looks. They’re beautiful, and with OpSail coming we want the downtown to look as good as it possibly can.”

Receive updates to this story and other breaking news in your inbox or smartphone by signing up for our newsletter here

Under the executive order signed by Finizio in May, event organizers must account for the use of city services and pay this amount up front before any permits can be issued or any services can be rendered. On Monday, Parsekian told the City Council that Finizio’s office administrator, Tammy Daugherty, informed her that the city would to have Public Works hang the banners on light posts.

Parsekian said the city later agreed to cut the fee in half. She said New London Main Street received permission to seek a cheaper price through a private company, but then found out that the Public Works union would not allow this. She said the department also increased the price by 30 percent—to about $9,000—to put the banners up in time for OpSail, which .

Parsekian said the non-profit organization prepares a budget which zeroes out at the end of each fiscal year on June 30. She said the city informed her during the winter that it might have to charge for installation, but did not confirm this or give a cost estimate. She said that as a result, the organization did not include installation costs in the price for a sponsor to purchase a banner.

 “That was the problem, that they did this to us in the middle of a fiscal year,” she said.

The City Council responded to the request by unanimously requesting Finizio’s administration to work with Public Works to resolve the issue. Some councilors suggested temporarily curtailing some services or putting the banners up piecemeal in order to keep costs to the city down.

Finizio said event organizers, parade committees, and non-profits should be prepared to account for the cost of city services in the future.

“[T]he days of the city being able to provide free services are over,” said Finizio. “The city budget is very lean, and the provision of free services in the coming fiscal year is simply something the city cannot afford. With no operating fund balance, such free services would force New London into a deficit, something we simply cannot sustain and remain solvent.”

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!