.
Feedback

Finizio Announces "Monumental Step Forward" With New London Police Union

Mayor says tentative agreement will result in close to $1 million in savings

Saying it represents a major improvement in the relationship between the city administration and , Mayor Daryl Finizio announced this evening that tentative agreements with the New London Police Union have been approved.

Finizio said all layoffs in the police department during the 2013 fiscal year will be avoided under a . He said the second one, approved this morning, will result in at least $954,000 in savings and the resolution of numerous grievances and municipal prohibited practice complaints.

“There are still going to be disagreements and there are still some unresolved issues,” said Finizio. “But I think overall this is a positive step.”

Receive updates to this story and other breaking news in your inbox or smartphone by signing up for our newsletter here

Todd Lynch, president of the New London Police Union, said he thought the agreement represented a “turning point” in the relationship between the union and mayor’s office. He thanked Chief Administrative Officer Jane Glover, who has negotiated agreements with both the police and fire unions.

“We believe the results here are fair dealing for everyone,” said Lynch.

Agreement conditions

Finizio said the majority of the savings will come from scheduling changes to reduce overtime at a cost reduction of about $500,000. He said $350,000 will be saved by the removal of a direct dealing grievance, $175,000 by the removal of an additional 34 grievances and complaints, and $14,000 by the June tentative agreement.

The union has been criticized Finizio on several occasions, in particular his decision to . In a political update earlier this year, union political director Chuck Flynn said Finizio has .

Finizio also decided , later hiring former New Haven assistant police chief to take his place. Captains William Dittman and Michael Lacey , but later after the City Council necessary to meet the retirement agreements. These suits have since been .

Lynch also , saying the chief has acted in a retaliatory fashion due to his criticism. This case has been transferred to federal court.

Of the grievances and complaints settled by the agreement, Lynch and Dittman each filed six while Lacey filed one.

Finizio has fired two police officers— and —since taking office. Finizio said Bergeson was fired due to frequent absences and his disciplinary history, while Northup was fired after an incident last August in which he off Bank Street. As part of the agreements, the city agreed to remove any objections to the appeal of these terminations.

The new agreement awards four compensation days to each bargaining unit member, to be used in the 2013 fiscal year. These days may substitute previously scheduled vacation days but cannot create overtime. Finizio said these will offset the savings realized in other parts of the agreement by $85,000.

The agreement also adds the stipulation that police union employees on leave under the Family Medical Leave Act are responsible for payment of their full medical coverage during the use of any authorized leave without pay.

Lynch said the union’s executive committee met on the agreement this afternoon and the total membership was informed of it as well.

June agreement

Ten police employees in May. Finizio said at that time that it would be necessary to fire the employees and leave 11 positions vacant in order for the department to meet a .

An initial tentative agreement in June rescinded this decision and promised that no layoffs would occur in the department in the 2013 fiscal year. This agreement also promised to and maintain them during the 2013 fiscal year, have Glover and Lynch meet to resolve grievances and complaints,  and have the union agree to support the as well as the city’s budget during any .

Finizio said the City Council is not required to approve the agreements, as it did in the case of an , as they not require any supplemental funding or budget transfers.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!