.
Feedback

VIDEO: New London Firefighters Will Be Laid Off Today

Council unanimously tables decision on a tentative agreement with the firefighters' union; 24 layoffs go into effect on Tuesday evening

Twenty-four members of the are scheduled to lose their jobs on Tuesday evening following a City Council vote to table a tentative agreement with the fire union.

The council unanimously voted to table the agreement. The decision follows two July 2 votes in which the council . Mayor Daryl Finizio said the layoffs will go into effect at 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday in order to balance the department’s approved budget for the 2013 fiscal year.

"I was completely outraged. It's completely ridiculous what the men have been through," said Rocco Basilica, president of the New London Firefighters Local 1522.

The details of the agreement have not been publicly released, but Basilica said it includes reducing the staffing levels per shift from 18 to 16 at a savings of $750,000 per year plus $463,000 in overtime. Firefighters would also forfeit two raises totaling 4.25 percent and give up nine positions with no layoffs.

The agreement was negotiated between Finizio’s administration and the union. Under the budget approved by the City Council, Finizio initially said it would be necessary to . The council initially , including administrative salaries, to increase the department’s budget. It later agreed to following and announcement that the administration had reached a tentative agreement with the union.  

Proponents of the agreement said it would make the department more competitive by implementing a pension system, allowing older firefighters to retire and newer firefighters to be retained. Councilors opposed to the agreement said they had not received assurances that it would lead to long-term savings.

Support for the agreement

Prior to the council meeting, members of the New London union and other firefighters’ unions from across the state rallied in front of . Layoffs will take place based on which employees were hired last, and the affected men wore shirts bearing the number signifying their order of seniority.

“The guys are constantly rising to the challenge, despite what’s going on,” said Lt. Jeffrey Rheaume. “But they’re fearful about being laid off and what it would mean for the department and the city.”

Firefighter Mike Leonard said the agreement would correct issues with the department’s retirement system. He said the firefighters do not receive Social Security, and that layoffs would leave a workforce of people in their 50s and 60s who would be more vulnerable to medical issues.

“We’re going to in a few weeks here, it looks like, and we need to save money,” said Leonard.

Lt. Jonathan Paige, vice president of the union, said the agreement would allow older firefighters to retire and have the Connecticut Municipal Employees Retirement System absorb injury costs. Firefighter Kevin Campbell, one of the employees who will lose his job, said the current system requires New London firefighters to work until age 65. He said the agreement would help retain younger firefighters, who often leave to join departments with better benefits, and that this would allow the department to improve its diversity as well.

Employees also said the layoffs would have a detrimental effect on the department’s operations. Deputy Chief Henry Kydd said he thinks response times will increase and residents and firefighters will be at risk.

“I never thought in my life I’d see what is happening here,” he said. “It’s disgusting.”

Basilica said the layoffs affect about 40 percent of the department’s workforce. One of the 25 people who received a pink slip has since left the department. Lt. Roger Tompkins said the remaining firefighters will face increased pressure and lengthy shifts. Tompkins said the department’s expenditures would also increase due to additional overtime costs.

“There’s no need for them not to agree,” he said.

Council response

Councilor Adam Sprecace said he thought the agreement would result in savings for the 2013 fiscal year, but was not convinced that it would carry over to additional years. He said he was also disappointed that the council did not have a role in the bargaining process, and felt there had been little time to review the agreement.

“What I’m seeing is city after city going bankrupt, and they’re going bankrupt in part due to ageements like this,” he said.

Sprecace also said he thought Finizio was trying to force action on the issue due to the threat of layoffs. He said he considers that there is enough money in the fire department’s budget to defer the layoffs for an additional 10 months.

“I didn’t run for office to be a rubber stamp,” he said. “If I have concerns, I’m going to relay them and I’m going to act on them. If I don’t get them addressed, I’m going to act another way. And to vote with a gun to my head is not something I’ll ever do.”

Councilor John Maynard criticized the actions of Finizio and Council President Michael Passero, accusing them of striking a deal to override Finizio’s veto. Maynard said the council’s original transfer of funds from other areas would have avoided the layoffs.

 “You need to be looking at these individuals that took the money out of the fire department and put it back in the mayor’s office, not me,” he said.

Councilor Anthony Nolan said he has talked with Finance Director Jeff Smith and others involved in the process, and considered that the agreement would result in savings continuing beyond the 2013 fiscal year.

“Some of you told me that well, you’re losing votes,” he said. “Well, I was voted in to do what I thought was in the best interests in the city. So if losing your vote is because of something I think is in the best interests of the city, take your vote.”

Councilor Donald Macrino also supported the agreement, saying the city could renegotiate it after a year if they determined that there were unanticipated costs involved.

“It at least appears to me at this point that this deal can be successfully struck and preserve the integrity of our tax base and the city of New London,” he said.

Passero continued to recuse himself from votes on the issue since he is employed as a New London firefighter. Before leaving the chambers, however, he gave a brief statement.

“I only hope that we can resolve the issue,” he said. “I believe we will resolve the issue. We’ve been through difficult times in this city before. We’ve worked together, we’ve come together, we’ve disagreed, and we’ll come together again. So we will overcome this issue.”

Council President Pro Tempore Wade Hyslop, who previously supported the agreement, was absent due to a medical issue. The remaining councilors unanimously accepted a motion by Macrino to table the question.

Finizio statement

After meeting with Basilica and Kydd, Finizio spoke to firefighters and their families outside his office. He apologized on behalf of the city for the anxiety the employees have faced.

“The City Council has failed to act on a very reasonable agreement that the city reached in good faith with our fire union,” he said. “This agreement saved the city all necessary funds to avoid all layoffs, generate significant savings, and give our firefighters the pension that they deserve.”

Finizio said that he met with Fire Chief Ron Samul, Chief Administrative Officer Jane Glover, and others and came to the conclusion that the layoffs would go into effect if the council did not approve the agreement.

“This is not a matter of financial realities. This is not a matter of confusion. This is, simply put, a matter of politics,” he said. “But the city administration in a tough budget with no reserves with no fund balance cannot play politics anymore.”

Finizio said his administration will work with the councilors and union as soon as possible in an attempt to avoid the layoffs.

“This is a tragic result for the city of New London that I hope in time can be resolved,” he said.

 

9:25 p.m. update

Twenty-four layoffs in the will go into effect at 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday following the City Council's decision to table a tentative agreement with the firefighters' union.

Mayor Daryl Finizio accused the council of political posturing in the decision. He said councilors have had adequate time to review the agreement and that the layoffs in the department have been twice postponed while the administration negotiated with the union. He said the layoffs will go into effect in order to balance the department's 2013 fiscal year budget.

"I was completely outraged. It's completely ridiculous what the men have been through," said Rocco Basilica, president of the New London Firefighters Local 1522.

The details of the agreement have not been publicly released, but Basilica said it includes reducing the staffing levels per shift from 18 to 16 at a savings of $750,000 per year plus $463,000 in overtime. Firefighters would also forfeit two raises totaling 4.25 percent and give up nine positions with no layoffs.

Several members of the firefighters' union spoke in favor of the agreement, saying it would create a pension plan allowing older firefighters to retire. They said this would help with the retention of younger firefighters and help to make the department more diverse.

Opponents said they did not think there was sufficient information on whether the agreement would result in long-term savings.

Receive updates to this story and other breaking news in your inbox or smartphone by signing up for our newsletter here

On July 2, council approval of the agreement . Councilors who opposed the agreement said they felt they had not had sufficient time to review the agreement and expressed concerns over whether transferring the department to the Municipal Employees Retirement Fund would result in increased costs to the city. Council President Michael Passero, who is employed as a firefighter, recused himself from the vote.

Twenty-five layoffs were scheduled to go into effect in the fire department on July 3. Finizio put these on hold for two weeks, asking the council to review the agreement and meet with his administration on any concerns before reconsidering the matter at tonight’s meeting.

A full story will be posted this evening.

 

Original breaking news

The New London City Council tabled a vote to accept a tentative agreement with the firefighters' union, and 25 firefighters are set to be laid off as of 5:30 p.m. Tuesday.

The story will be updated soon.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Matthew Macunus Jr. May 24, 2013 at 02:25 pm
Kathleen, I think if we contact Sportees for less that $22 we can get the shirts done in the nextRead More town over and even get an AMERICAN made shirt. If we sell them for $15 we can make a good profit for your Favorite Charity. Call Jack at Sportees, (860) 440-3922. Local guy employing local union printers and a better price. BUY LOCAL! The money stays in the area! Build the Southeastern CT economy.
Ryan Schrader May 24, 2013 at 02:15 pm
Absolutely Kathleen.
Kathleen Mitchell May 24, 2013 at 02:09 pm
Ryan, When I said "give a little donation to my favorite charity" I didn't mean give aRead More shirt to Peg. I meant send a check to Where Angels Play Foundation at 245 Shaw St., New London, CT 06320 for our playground, Emilie's Shady Spot, which will be built at Riverside Park in honor of little Emilie Parker, one of the children killed at Sandy Hook. Ours is just one of 26 playgrounds being built by New Jersey State Firefighters Mutual Benevolent Association to honor the victims. http://www.thesandygroundproject.org/ What do you say?
Joshua Pendleton May 24, 2013 at 06:31 pm
@The Truth Hurts, one of the most valuble leasons ive ever learned was from my last comandingRead More officer, and i quote "we wear our last names on our uniforms not just to identfy ourselves but to let people know when we speak, we attach those word to who we are as credible men. our names are our credibility". Ill let you figure that one out The truth hurts.
Matthew Macunus Jr. May 24, 2013 at 01:34 pm
OMG I did not realize that "CLUELESS" was her middle name. And she would be a fittingRead More addition to "Team Finizio". It keeps it all on the same plane of ability.
Sue P. May 24, 2013 at 12:34 pm
I think that all of you who are asking Zak to resign better take another glance at what you areRead More saying. If Zak did decide to resign who do you think Mr. Mayor himself would put in Zaks place? Think about it, does the name Laura Clueless Natusch come to mind. She has been the all time supporter of Himself and he does owe her something for standing by him in all of the foolishness. Be careful what you wish for. I personally would find that entertaining. Come on seriously that would be a hoot.
Felicia Hendersen May 24, 2013 at 09:11 am
Truth Hurts, that is exactly the reason that Zak needs to step down, dumb youthful urges and notRead More thinking before one acts is not the right mix for someone in the position representing the community. Do the right thing Zak and resign. These things never go away, but you should.
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 10:01 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:52 pm
And what I meant by that comment that I don't think this whole thing has anything to do withRead More t-shirt , it's just a shutout to the Mayer and what he is bringing to the table .
--Robert May 23, 2013 at 03:15 am
Pathetic that anyone would post this as a legit news story, more so that it seems a big corporationRead More is behind these ads.
Jason Morris May 22, 2013 at 01:30 pm
Jessica's previous two posts in other city's patch pages, with the exact same title (just schoolRead More district name changed) have been moderated/deleted. Recommend this corporate advertisement to get the same fate. The concerns are true, but it's an ad nontheless.
Felicia Hendersen May 24, 2013 at 09:13 am
Barbara, the shirt creator, Zak and the band of mayoral supporters all share the same mind. That isRead More why it is difficult for them to make any good decisions.
Barbara Crocker May 23, 2013 at 07:39 pm
My observance that NL people are not the haters, but the hated, amuses you??? Don't quite get that,Read More but it seems by the post written by the shirt's creator, that you don't get it either...
Marco Frucht May 23, 2013 at 06:43 pm
Barbara, Felicia, you people amuse me! Might I also suggest that this entire issue is being blownRead More way out of proportion?
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 03:40 pm
I would say that the Collective Bargaining Agreement would have to be looked at for his Union.Read More Mr. Hathaway is not in Local 1378. He is MEU. I would say, that this is an interesting question for our members. Local 1378's CBA does not go into this language, however it does state that prior to reorganization, the union must be notified to bargain the impacts (not exact language). This is not to say that the union has final say, or say at all as to how the administration shall operate, but the impact to the employees is what matters as well as the position in general. I will look into this language in reference to the Charter and forward it to the MEU as well. Thank you.
Kathleen Mitchell May 22, 2013 at 03:17 pm
The following is from NL's Charter, Sec 46. Does it mean that Bill Hathaway would be entitled to aRead More public hearing? "...Any officer or employee so removed, suspended, laid off or reduced in grade shall, if he so request, be furnished with a written statement of the reason therefor, be allowed a reasonable time for answering such reasons in writing and be given a public hearing by the officer making such removal, suspension, lay-off or reduction in grade, before the order therefor shall be made final..."
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
I have not seen any details other than word of mouth at this time in reference to more being addedRead More to the pension plan after two years. I would not be surprised. This would be another instance in which the charter was violated and would have to be mentioned to the Admin. Committee. I would be willing to gamble that they were put into the employee pension plan as well.