.
Feedback

Committee Asks For Funding Sources, Location Recommendation On Riverside Park Playscape

Debate continues on proposed transfer of play equipment to New London park

A committee of the New London City Council expressed their support for moving a playscape into Riverside Park and concerns with delays in the process, but recommended tabling action on the item until questions over location and costs can be addressed.

The Education, Parks and Recreation Committee voted unanimously to hold off on action on relocating a playscape from Veterans Field to the park. Committee member Donald Macrino said that in the interim, landscape architects putting together a master plan for improvements at the park can recommend where the playscape should go. Macrino said Public Works Director Tim Hanser can also look into funding sources for the project and what work might need to be done to prepare a site for the playscape.

“I don’t know why it’s so difficult,” said Macrino. “They must have this thing on the drawing board. It must be almost done, it’s due in June. This isn’t Central Park, it’s Riverside.”

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

The proposal to move the playscape from outside the modular classrooms on Cedar Grove Ave., which are no longer in use, has met with both support and opposition. Supporters say Riverside Park is overdue for play equipment since aging playscapes were removed from the site, while opponents say relocating the park before the completion of the master plan would be premature and may not be the best use of funds for park improvement.

The Parks and Recreation Commission recently recommended the relocation of the playscape to the park entrance on Adelaide Street. Resident Dennis Downing said he supported this idea, but thought the playscape would be better suited for the park interior after hearing the argument that it would allow families to enjoy the park while parents are able to keep an eye on their children.

Hanser said he received an estimate in January that it would cost about $56,000 to relocate the playscape to a level area in the park. The estimate includes a poured in place rubber safety surface, a feature which has led some residents to question whether other materials could be used for a lower price. Resident Cathi Strother cautioned that some materials could lead to problems with feral cats in the park.

“You have to keep in mind that these cats will use certain areas for their litterbox,” she said.

Ronna Stuller, of the Riverside Park Conservancy, said the conservancy has voiced support for a playscape in the park but does not think now is the right time to do so. She said she considered the issue an important one, but not an urgent one since the removal of the modular classrooms is not yet underway.

“I think it’s important to make an informed decision on this rather than an emotional one,” she said.

Stuller said University of Connecticut architects are currently preparing a master plan for the park to be presented in June. A preliminary presentation of recommendations included converting some park roads to pedestrian walkways and eliminating other roads to increase green space.

Councilor Anthony Nolan, chair of the committee, and Council President Pro Tempore Wade Hyslop each expressed support for putting a playscape in the park interior, with Hyslop suggesting June as a target date for setting up the equipment.

“My worry is that that park has gone so long without a playscape that we would have to wait a year, or more than a year, to get a playscape for the children in that area,” said Nolan.

Macrino said the landscape architects should be able to make a recommendation on the playscape before the release of the final plan, suggesting an April 9 hearing on park plans as a deadline. Council President Michael Passero, a non-voting councilor who attended the committee, suggested that Hanser should pursue Local Capital Improvement Program funds for the project.

“I think the problem is going to be finding the funding to do this in the first place,” said Passero.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?