City Council Questions Need For Public Safety Layoffs

New London's fiscal year 2013 budget passes second reading

A for fiscal year 2013 survived a split City Council vote on Monday, with some members doubting the need for layoffs in public safety departments.

At the second reading of the budget, the council voted 4-3 in favor of an appropriation ordinance for a $40,626,405 municipal budget and 5-2 in favor of a $42,466,252 appropriation ordinance for the . The agenda called for a third and final reading on Monday as well, but the council unanimously amended the item to allow the final reading to take place separately prior to the May 31 deadline.

“There’s still too much going on in this budget, and we need more time to address it properly,” said Councilor Adam Sprecace.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Police and fire layoffs

On Thursday, Mayor Daryl Finizio said that under the budget proposal the will have to and leave five vacant positions unbudgeted. He said the will have to fire 10 police officers while leaving 11 vacant positions unbudgeted.

The council is proposing an $11,390,198 police budget and $7,994,314 fire budget. The police budget is an $890,453 cut from , while the fire budget represents an $840,617 cut from the request.

Personnel Coordinator Bernadette Welch said on Friday that the layoffs will save an estimated $580,000 in the police department and $545,000 in the fire department. She said the high number of layoffs is needed to bring the budgets down to the level requested by the council because such terminations result in increased unemployment and overtime costs.

Finizio said on Friday that the administration is and that he hopes an agreement can be reached where layoffs are not necessary. Rocco Basilica, president of New London Fire Fighters Local 1522, said the union is willing to negotiate but also said he considered that the department is being unfairly targeted.

“Every day, the men and women of the New London Fire Department put their lives on the line,” said Basilica. “That is not a dramatic statement. That is a fact.”

Council President Michael Passero and Sprecace both said they do not think that layoffs were necessary in the departments under their current budgets. Passero characterized Finizio’s declaration that layoffs are possible as a “surprise announcement” and said he still considers that there are adequate funds to cover the departments’ expenses.

“I don’t believe this budget requires layoffs,” said Passero. “We’ve supported the administration’s reorganization and up until Thursday I thought we were going to work collaboratively to present it to the public. And I’m hopeful that we can still do it.”

Sprecace estimated that the layoffs will result in $500,000 in additional overtime costs over the actual number for the current fiscal year.

“I think there is sufficient money to fund the fire department where it is now,” he said.

Finizio said he made the announcement after talks with the unions stalled in order to give the maximum amount of time to have the council consider the matter and to allow negotiations with the unions proceed. He said Fire Chief Ron Samul told him he would have to hand out 25 pink slips at the proposed funding level, and that this is the only option available to meet the budget unless union negotiations are successful or the council reinstates funding.

“It’s my signature for every single person that loses their job,” said Finizio. “I have to live with it. And I don’t want to do it.”

Council authority

Councilor John Maynard said he was not surprised by the announcement of potential layoffs, saying Finizio had previously said layoffs would be likely be necessary due to budget cuts. However, Maynard also criticized the decision to and retain the position while firing officers. He also said he considered that the council had ceded control to Finizio and department heads on where layoffs should take place.

“This council voted 5-2 to give him the authority to do that,” said Maynard.

Maynard was referencing an in which the council said they would let Police Chief Margaret Ackley would decide where in her department any cuts would take place. This vote stepped back from a as part of budget reductions in the police department.

Passero said councilors can still make recommendations for line item cuts at the second and third budget readings. Sprecace said the council still controls the city finances. He said that while the council can recommend eliminating funds for specific positions, the mayor has the ability to use a line item veto to overturn these decisions.

“We didn’t relinquish anything,” said Sprecace.

Maynard said he would prefer to make cuts at the administrative level rather than at the bottom. He suggested that the council should make line item cuts to put the responsibility on Finizio for retaining any such positions the council might decide to cut, and noted that the council can also overturn a mayoral veto with six votes.

President Pro Tempore Wade Hyslop said the decision on which areas to cut if necessary falls to department heads.

“We control the purse strings, yes. We control the bottom line, yes,” said Hyslop. “But it’s up to the departments to make that work.”


Hyslop and Nolan previously opposed the proposed municipal budget after the council voted to make an additional two percent cut to existing decreases in order to bring the tax increase down to 8.33 percent. They remained opposed to the proposed budget on the second reading. Maynard also dissented, saying he would not support the budget until he considers that the council has the authority to make line item cuts.

The proposal for the school budget passed without discussion, with Hyslop and Nolan opposed.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Debbie May 22, 2012 at 12:54 PM
Thank you Councillors for voting in the current budget that is sufficient to cover and operate all departments in the upcoming fiscal year. Hard to believe a 2% reduction would result in these many layoffs. Guess our city employees were hoping for another raise this coming fiscal year, above their already higher than average salaries. Get over it city employees and unions, for the city can no longer afford to maintain projected salaries and benefits, and by the way, if your annual income should change or be reduced, or you do get laided off to trim the overall budget, welcome to the club. Peace and blessings.
NewLondonSource May 22, 2012 at 02:05 PM
“I think there is sufficient money to fund the fire department where it is now,” We need to hear more details from Sprecace on this; If it's possible to avoid 25 layoffs without raising the budget or taxes, let the man speak! At least he's proactively coming to the table with some ideas, unlike most of the other councilors who just sit back and rest on their laurels...
Sue P. May 22, 2012 at 02:40 PM
I couldn't agree more. To watch Wade Hyslop sit back and bully the other councilors with no solutions of his own was very upsetting. There are some ridiculous amounts for simple things in this budget.
John Lynch May 22, 2012 at 02:54 PM
There is no way the tax and spend democratic progressive is going to touch any fire fighters for lay-off. That would mean he would have to lay-off Mayo and that won't happen. The Naacp would be on the mayor and he doesn't want that. He will call another one of his many press releases and say that he found the money to leave the fire fighters alone. He is using Malloy's play book and trying to scare people. Hopefully the union and council don't fall for his petty games. He is like a little child, if I don't get my way I will hold my breath and stomp my feet.
rtgehdrmfgbhnpolkfjh May 22, 2012 at 04:05 PM
Maybe he'll pass out, and wake up with some sense, honesty, and compassion...three things he seems to be lacking.
Debbie May 22, 2012 at 05:02 PM
Do not allow Mayor or Chief's to intimidate or change your vote on the proposed city-wide budget - taxpayers will support you on these much needed reductions. Peace and blessings.
Stephanie James May 22, 2012 at 07:07 PM
the mayor told them about these layoffs....why would he intimidate them when the council president is the one denying the need? Nevermind the fact that passero is a firefighter who is talking about layoffs in his own department. seems slightly unethical.
Keep it real May 22, 2012 at 08:18 PM
Debbie, please give us a detailed comparison of the "higher than average" salaries. While your at it, please also make sure you compare the FD pension with every other FD pension in the state or New England for that matter. Why do you think the young fire fighters are leaving at a faster pace than ever? If you look at the historical data, the fire fighters have always been reasonable in negotiations with the city. There are many contract cycles with at least one year with no raises, increased cost sharing, reduction in starting pay, etc....
Keep it real May 22, 2012 at 08:31 PM
While your saying your blessings, please say one for the fire fighters who will be working non-stop through the summer at the age of 60-65 because of these proposed layoffs. The youngest in the department will be the ones to go and the older fire fighters will be working because they can't afford to retire. Did I mention that fire fighters don't get social security benefits? That's because fire fighters usually have a defined benefit pension, except in New London.
William Desmond May 23, 2012 at 06:49 PM
From the Day: gone Posted: May 23, 2012 12:49 pm "New London RN, I find it vey hypocritcal that you are complaining about the pay for the firefights. I work with you and the hospital and we make $49.50 an hour. That doesn't include any shift differential. We get double time on holidays and they don't. On top of our high rate of pay we get shift premium and time and a half after 8 hours. When people are complaining about not being able to afford their hospital bills. Why don't you offer to take less money. I live right down the street from the Willetts Ave apartment that burned a few years ago. I watched the men of the fire department save many lives that night. I don't want to think would have happened if there were less men in duty" Very disturbing that a UNION NURSE making almost $50 an hour would attack other union workers in her community. This will surely not make her or her union popular when the hospital wants to cut their wages to keep costs in check and boost the hospital bottom line. I had no idea that the nurses at L&M made that much. I guess that the rest of the community does not realize that either. No wonder healthcare costs are on the rise. Maybe L&M can cut the nurses pay rates and pay the city for fire services. Then we can keep all the firefighters and even add some. If they cut nurses wages to $25 an hour that would be fair.
Kathleen Mitchell May 28, 2012 at 04:24 PM
As most people now know, Mayor Finizio has issued layoff notices to 25 New London firefighters which will take effect on July 1 this year. It is time for us, the residents, to fight back, show support for those who have done so much for us AND to let Mayor Finizio know that we are tired of his political games-especially when he is playing with our safety. Show support for our members from the New London Fire Fighters Local 1522 by attending Tuesday's (tomorrow) City Council meeting which begins at 7PM in Council Chambers which is on the third floor of City Hall. If you plan to speak, you should be there by 6:30PM to sign up. Let's call an end to these political games by helping those who are always there to help us-our public safety workers.
Kenneth R. Lewis May 28, 2012 at 08:42 PM
Perhaps you are the enemy of the working people by the way you attack others while you rake in about $50 an hour..........
Kenneth R. Lewis May 28, 2012 at 08:43 PM
Part 2..... New London RN Posted: May 23, 2012 7:41 pm Joe H. I apologize for not being there at the end of the DTC meeting last night, and didn't know you wished to speak with me. I left early to go to the convention for Elissa Wright in Groton. I would, however, be happy to have a conversation with you, as I've clearly upset you by my opinion. Feel free to contact me. The thing is Joe, I'm NOT the enemy. The economy is. If you see in my original post of this article, I've written: "I wouldn't argue the fact that our public safety officers are worth it - but when there is no money to pay them these negotiated amounts, of course layoffs would then become the only answer."
Kenneth R. Lewis May 28, 2012 at 08:46 PM
Part 3........... I know a lot of the firefighters from my many years of working in the E.R. I've WORKED with you. But we live in a city that has no money! So what's the answer? Now, comparing my job to yours: The hospital is ALWAYS looking at ways to cut spending. That's why it is the most financially stable hospital in the state of CT. (That's a fact)How does it do that? One way is this: It gives us our 2% pay raise and then raises our insurance copays and premiums to offset the raise. For those of us who have been employees for a long time (thus have reached the top of our pay scales), we have not seen a net increase in our pay for many years. Thus, I've made the same amount of money over the past 7-8 years, yet STILL spoke at the budget hearing about NOT making more cuts to New London's budget so that people in your department don't lose their jobs! MANY people have to forgo raises and/or have layoffs at their place of employement in this economy. You work for a city that is BROKE. That is a sad fact. I am not the enemy. I'm sorry you feel that I am It is wage scales similar to that of the L&M nurses that cause the cost of our health care to skyrocket. I expect that huge givebacks in the 50% range will bring the costs in line. Are you willing to make that concession for the greater good?
Kenneth R. Lewis May 28, 2012 at 08:48 PM
"I've made the same amount of money over the past 7-8 years" I think that may not be the truth, I would welcome a little research by the editor here and posting of the contract agreements with the L&M nurses over the past 10 years, then we would know the truth.
Kathleen Mitchell May 28, 2012 at 09:35 PM
New London RN who posted "...but when there is no money to pay them these negotiated amounts, of course layoffs would then become the only answer." Why are you assuming there is no money and that, if layoffs are necessary, that they should come from two of the most essential departments in our city? There are many people, myself included, who think that there is money but it has been spent recklessly and for positions that were either not budgeted for or were non-essential considering New London's financial situation. That doesn't even take into account the amount of money spent on hefty and unnecessary separation agreements negotiated by the mayor without council input until after the fact. And it doesn't make me feel any better that the mayor, after giving members of his overstaffed office extraordinary salaries, in consideration of the city's financial crisis, cut 5% from their salaries. If layoffs are necessary, they should come from non-essential personnel and NOT from the people who save our lives.
lion king May 29, 2012 at 02:27 PM
kathleen, back a few mounths ago you put an FOI request for certian complaints filed against some police officers,some cops let those out and others did not ,the very union president did not release his own cc complaints and if you search further you will see how many and why he did not want you to know ,one has led to a civil action that cost the taxpayers money ,the law director dont work for free ,no one wants to layoff cops but in my opinion some cops should be fired not get a pink slip ,


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something