.
Feedback

Chief Ackley Drops Complaint Against Buscetto

Police chief says ethics matter is no longer germane since city councilor will no longer be involved in municipal government

Saying it is no longer relevant since he will soon be leaving city government, Police Chief Margaret Ackley dropped an ethics complaint against City Councilor Michael Buscetto III on Wednesday.

The Board of Ethics was scheduled to begin hearings on the complaint following their finding of probable cause in the matter. Ackley’s attorney, Shelley Graves, said in an e-mail to Board of Ethics Chairman K. Robert Lewis on Tuesday evening, noting that Buscetto will no longer be a city councilor after Dec. 5 due to an unsuccessful mayoral bid. Buscetto, running a write-in campaign, had 1,153 votes but .

“Chief Ackley has also received the assurances of the law director that Councilor Buscetto will not be involved in any further council discussions or action concerning her legal claim between now and the end of Mr. Buscetto's term on the council,” Graves said in the e-mail. “As the scheduled ethics hearing is narrowly limited in scope to the propriety of recusal, the issue would appear to be moot and we no longer have a compelling reason to continue forward with the complaint. As a result, it is hereby withdrawn.”

The e-mail was also sent to the other six members of the City Council, Law Director Thomas Londregan, City Manager Denise Rose, Buscetto’s attorney Kelly Reardon, and Board of Ethics counsel Edward Cassella. The five members of the board present voted unanimously to accept the withdrawal.

The complaint

Ackley met with the in August to discuss a retirement agreement in which she would step down as chief on Jan. 2 and give up accrued compensatory time in exchange for benefits such as an increased pension and having the city pay half of her health insurance until age 65. During these meetings, Buscetto refused to recuse himself as requested by Graves.

On Aug. 24, Ackley publicly and seeking to undermine her authority in the . According to correspondence between Graves and the City Council, Ackley’s concerns included “issues and happenings that are tantamount to a hostile working environment” as well as incidents and issues that “provide a legal basis for the bringing of a lawsuit by Chief Ackley against the city for gender discrimination and harassment.”

On Sept. 29, the board to further investigate Ackley’s claims that Buscetto twice violated the standards of conduct section and committed one violation each of the conflict of interest section and the confidential information section of the Code of Ethics. Reardon argued earlier this month that the board and that four members had a conflict of interest in the matter.

Reactions

Reardon said she was prepared for the possibility of the board deciding to continue the hearing despite Ackley’s request.

“I think that Mr. Buscetto will be pleased that this whole matter was resolved favorably for him,” said Reardon.

However, Reardon also said she considered it “fishy to say the least” that the withdrawal occurred a week after the election. She said the timing “obviously demonstrated that this was all about politics and making sure Mr. Buscetto was not elected mayor.”

Board of Ethics member Eunice Waller said was disappointed that Buscetto did not appear in person before the committee.

“I just think it’s a one-sided thing, and I haven’t heard how he feels,” she said. “He should have appeared before us.”

Lewis said he felt the board exercised proper oversight and fulfilled their obligations, including refraining from public discussion about the case. He said subpoenas had been issued to Londregan and City Council members for the hearing, and requests had been made for recordings of the hearings.

“We are confident that the board proceeded according to the Code [of Ethics],” said Lewis.

Lewis said the circumstances of this matter demonstrate a need for an update to the code. He said that “if somebody wants to withdraw, you have to let them withdraw,” but the code currently does not stipulate that this is allowed prior to a hearing.

Ackley’s retirement agreement includes a clause allowing her to rescind the agreement within 21 days of its acceptance or between Dec. 15 and 31. Finizio has said , but neither she nor Finizio have said whether she has made a decision on the matter.

Ackley and Buscetto were not available for comment on Wednesday evening.

 

Original story

Police Chief Margaret Ackley has dropped an ethics complaint against City Councilor Michael Buscetto, saying the complaint is no longer relevant since Buscetto will not be part of the new municipal government.

K. Robert Lewis, the chairman of the Board of Ethics, received the request to drop the complaint on Tuesday. The board, which was meeting on Wednesday evening to begin hearings in the procedure after in the matter, agreed to the request.

Buscetto, who has been on the City Council since 2007, ran for the mayor's office in this month's election as a write-in candidate but . Buscetto's term in the council ends on Dec. 5.

"The issue would appear to be moot, and we no longer have a compelling reason to continue forward with the complaint," said Ackley's attorney, Shelley Graves, in an e-mail to Lewis.

A full story will be posted shortly.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
The Truth Hurts May 24, 2013 at 12:23 pm
@Joshua: Looks like another mature, insightful and value added comment from a staunch supporter ofRead More Finizio. Par for the course.
Sue P. May 24, 2013 at 11:24 am
I have a great idea, Ryan, maybe you could make Zak a T-shirt that says New London hates Me. IRead More wonder if that would be offensive. As much as we all complain about the administration I would like to point out that there is nothing we can do about it for another 2 and a half years. It is what it is and I think of Zak as the only way to communicate with this administration. It's too bad that Tammy wasn't the one wearing the shirt. Zak works for Daryl Justin Finizio and he is to do what he is told or else. I for one do not want Zak to resign because he is the only one there besides Nate that can tell us what is happening in this city. Don't worry 2 and a half years is not that long and don't forget about this November when we can finally make a change. Stay informed.
Joshua Pendleton May 24, 2013 at 10:37 am
Rabble rabble rabble!! Zak should resigne!! rabble rabble rabble, the mayor should resigne!! rabbleRead More rabble rabble i am very offended!! Rable rable. What is this country coming to!! Preach on felicia!! You tell em the truth hurts! Rable rable rable rable!!!
Felicia Hendersen May 24, 2013 at 09:11 am
Truth Hurts, that is exactly the reason that Zak needs to step down, dumb youthful urges and notRead More thinking before one acts is not the right mix for someone in the position representing the community. Do the right thing Zak and resign. These things never go away, but you should.
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 10:01 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:52 pm
And what I meant by that comment that I don't think this whole thing has anything to do withRead More t-shirt , it's just a shutout to the Mayer and what he is bringing to the table .
--Robert May 23, 2013 at 03:15 am
Pathetic that anyone would post this as a legit news story, more so that it seems a big corporationRead More is behind these ads.
Jason Morris May 22, 2013 at 01:30 pm
Jessica's previous two posts in other city's patch pages, with the exact same title (just schoolRead More district name changed) have been moderated/deleted. Recommend this corporate advertisement to get the same fate. The concerns are true, but it's an ad nontheless.
Felicia Hendersen May 24, 2013 at 09:13 am
Barbara, the shirt creator, Zak and the band of mayoral supporters all share the same mind. That isRead More why it is difficult for them to make any good decisions.
Barbara Crocker May 23, 2013 at 07:39 pm
My observance that NL people are not the haters, but the hated, amuses you??? Don't quite get that,Read More but it seems by the post written by the shirt's creator, that you don't get it either...
Marco Frucht May 23, 2013 at 06:43 pm
Barbara, Felicia, you people amuse me! Might I also suggest that this entire issue is being blownRead More way out of proportion?
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 03:40 pm
I would say that the Collective Bargaining Agreement would have to be looked at for his Union.Read More Mr. Hathaway is not in Local 1378. He is MEU. I would say, that this is an interesting question for our members. Local 1378's CBA does not go into this language, however it does state that prior to reorganization, the union must be notified to bargain the impacts (not exact language). This is not to say that the union has final say, or say at all as to how the administration shall operate, but the impact to the employees is what matters as well as the position in general. I will look into this language in reference to the Charter and forward it to the MEU as well. Thank you.
Kathleen Mitchell May 22, 2013 at 03:17 pm
The following is from NL's Charter, Sec 46. Does it mean that Bill Hathaway would be entitled to aRead More public hearing? "...Any officer or employee so removed, suspended, laid off or reduced in grade shall, if he so request, be furnished with a written statement of the reason therefor, be allowed a reasonable time for answering such reasons in writing and be given a public hearing by the officer making such removal, suspension, lay-off or reduction in grade, before the order therefor shall be made final..."
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
I have not seen any details other than word of mouth at this time in reference to more being addedRead More to the pension plan after two years. I would not be surprised. This would be another instance in which the charter was violated and would have to be mentioned to the Admin. Committee. I would be willing to gamble that they were put into the employee pension plan as well.