.
Feedback

Bysiewicz Attack Ad At Center Of Democratic Debate

Wall Street contributions a point of contention between Senate candidates Susan Bysiewicz and Chris Murphy

Susan Bysiewicz stood by her criticisms of Rep. Chris Murphy’s campaign contributions at a Monday debate between the two Democratic candidates for Senate, while Murphy characterized her accusations as a “very tired attack.”

A Bysiewicz advertisement says Murphy has received over $700,000 in campaign contributions from Wall Street interests, “more hedge fund money than any other Democrat in Congress.” Bysiewicz has admitted that this claim is inaccurate, but says Murphy has still accepted significant Wall Street contributions and cannot claim to represent the middle class while doing so.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

“I absolutely stand by that ad, the premise of which is that you’ve become Nancy Johnson,” said Bysiewicz, referencing Murphy's predecessor in the House of Representatives.

Murphy defeated Johnson in the 2006 election, and accused her of receiving major contributions from drug companies during his campaign. Bysiewicz repeatedly questioned Murphy's vote against a 2010 bill designed to close hedge fund tax loopholes. Murphy answered that the bill supported some worthwhile programs, but that he did not believe it would effectively solve the issue.

“I voted against it because it wasn’t strong enough in closing corporate tax loopholes and individual tax loopholes,” he said.

Murphy also said Bysiewicz’s list of Wall Street contributors contains a number of Connecticut businesses, including his father’s law firm and a Litchfield farm. He said he was surprised that Bysiewicz refused to pull the ad after admitting that it contained inaccuracies.

“I have never seen anything like this, a candidate who has been caught lying on the air standing in front of an audience who says she stands by the ad,” he said.

Bysiewicz said she considers Murphy to be “cozy” with Wall Street interests, and that he has voted against tax cuts and other benefits for the middle class. She suggested that such actions may have been influenced by the funding, and that this was what differentiated the funds donated to Murphy from similar contributions to her own campaign. 

“Yes, I’ve taken some money from folks who work on Wall Street,” she said. “But they took the money knowing that I’d like to go to Washington to close the hedge fund loophole.”

Bysiewicz and Murphy agreed on other issues, including the question of whether the Bush tax cuts should be extended. Both candidates said they would support extending the cuts for families making $250,000 or less a year, but would not support proposals to expand this level up to families making $1 million or less.

Each candidate pointed to President Bill Clinton’s administration as an example of a successful economic policy. Murphy said there should be a broader discussion on tax reform regarding issues such as small-business owners passing business taxes through to their personal finances. He said that despite higher taxes in the Clinton years, the economy was more successful. Bysiewicz said she would work to eliminate subsidies for industries such as petroleum and agribusiness.

Bysiewicz and Murphy also agreed that Congress can help college graduates manage student debt by extending the Federal Pell Grant Program and holding colleges receiving federal funds accountable for keeping tuition affordable.

Murphy launched some missives against Linda McMahon, a Republican candidate who recent polls show has a comfortable lead over fellow candidate Christopher Shays. Murphy said McMahon is beholden to corporate interests, predicting that she will work to privatize Medicare and Social Security to the benefit of the private market and detriment of seniors. He also accused her of standing to personally receive a $7 million tax cut under her tax proposals.

“We can’t raise taxes on middle class taxes, but if we’re going to get serious about controlling the deficit we can’t give another $7 million tax cut to people making her income,” he said

The candidates are seeking to succeed Sen. Joe Lieberman, who is retiring at the end of his current term after 24 years in Congress. The debate at the was sponsored by and WTNH, with the League of Women Voters of Southeastern Connecticut assisting with the proceedings.

Both the Democratic and Republican primaries will take place on Aug. 14.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Doc Halliday May 19, 2013 at 08:23 am
Should the general public be required to support the retirement of our elected/hired governmentRead More officials? Should those retirement checks be based on base salary and not base salary plus overtime/extra pay/bonuses etc? Should ALL government officials be on a 401 system instead of a government (public supported) retirement system? ie: government official retires at 95% pay, in a few years with cost of living increases that official is making more in retirement than when working. The public cannot afford to continue such high retirements. Social Security is being tapped by government officials to pay OTHER items rather than for what it was intended and future retirees who contributed to SS may be left out.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!