.
Feedback

Witness Says Mountain Ave. Shooting Resulted From 2010 Incident

One man arrested after Saturday incident; witness says confrontation arose from drug deal two years ago

A confrontation over a 2010 drug deal culiminated in a Saturday evening shooting on Mountain Avenue, according to a affidavit.

Shaquon R. Carter, 23, of 54 Mountain Ave. was arrested on Monday afternoon on charges of criminal attempt to commit murder, first-degree assault, criminal attempt to commit first-degree assault, first-degree reckless endangerment, and criminal use of a weapon.

Carter is charged with shooting 26-year-old Tornando Robinson, according to . Robinson was shot three times in the legs and groin and taken to before being transferred to Yale-New Haven Hospital.

According to an affidavit by Detective William Pero, a woman told police that she went to Carter’s residence in 2010 to purchase cocaine for $150. She said Carter took the money without giving her the drugs and threatened her and a companion with a shotgun when they went to the residence later in the day.

The woman said she told Robinson about the incident, and that they saw Carter at in January. She said Robinson did not confront Carter there, but brought it up when they saw Carter again last week at . The woman said Carter “became aggressive and insisted they talk about the problem somewhere else because the police were in the area,” according to the affidavit.

The woman said Carter and two other men confronted her and Robinson while they were walking her dog on Saturday night. She said the men took out guns and that Carter shot Robinson and fired at her as she was hiding behind a vehicle.

The woman said one of the two other men walked away and said before the shooting that he did not want to get involved, but told police that she believed all three men shot at her before fleeing the scene. She identified Carter from a photo lineup.

Pero said Officer Kurt Lavimoniere drove down Mountain Ave. about an hour before the shooting as part of his regular patrol. Lavimoniere saw Carter and four other men, two of whom he knew, outside Carter’s residence.

Police found bullets and shell casings of several calibers at the scene, and several vehicles were damaged.

Carter was held on a $1 million bond, and this was reduced to $750,000 cash or surety bond after his initial appearance in the today. The case will be transferred to the .

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Joshua Pendleton May 23, 2013 at 09:18 pm
Scotty B, nothing you said counted after the incorect spelling of paragraph. Try again. ActuallyRead More dont try again. Not interested.
Scotty B May 23, 2013 at 08:46 pm
Your lack of pharagraphs and appearance of one long sentence makes your blog disinteresting to read.Read More But after reading it. i reallly am disinterested in it, and your T shirt.
Ryan Schrader May 23, 2013 at 08:28 pm
Barbara, I was referencing the one yuu made that contained "people from surrounding areas dontRead More like New Londoners." I should have used a direct quote, but I figured the tone of the article would kind of clarify it. I wouldn't call you an NL hater!
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 10:01 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:52 pm
And what I meant by that comment that I don't think this whole thing has anything to do withRead More t-shirt , it's just a shutout to the Mayer and what he is bringing to the table .
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:50 pm
We are young we like change and we like a good laugh that's all the t- shirt is ,
--Robert May 23, 2013 at 03:15 am
Pathetic that anyone would post this as a legit news story, more so that it seems a big corporationRead More is behind these ads.
Jason Morris May 22, 2013 at 01:30 pm
Jessica's previous two posts in other city's patch pages, with the exact same title (just schoolRead More district name changed) have been moderated/deleted. Recommend this corporate advertisement to get the same fate. The concerns are true, but it's an ad nontheless.
Barbara Crocker May 23, 2013 at 07:39 pm
My observance that NL people are not the haters, but the hated, amuses you??? Don't quite get that,Read More but it seems by the post written by the shirt's creator, that you don't get it either...
Marco Frucht May 23, 2013 at 06:43 pm
Barbara, Felicia, you people amuse me! Might I also suggest that this entire issue is being blownRead More way out of proportion?
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 09:59 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 03:40 pm
I would say that the Collective Bargaining Agreement would have to be looked at for his Union.Read More Mr. Hathaway is not in Local 1378. He is MEU. I would say, that this is an interesting question for our members. Local 1378's CBA does not go into this language, however it does state that prior to reorganization, the union must be notified to bargain the impacts (not exact language). This is not to say that the union has final say, or say at all as to how the administration shall operate, but the impact to the employees is what matters as well as the position in general. I will look into this language in reference to the Charter and forward it to the MEU as well. Thank you.
Kathleen Mitchell May 22, 2013 at 03:17 pm
The following is from NL's Charter, Sec 46. Does it mean that Bill Hathaway would be entitled to aRead More public hearing? "...Any officer or employee so removed, suspended, laid off or reduced in grade shall, if he so request, be furnished with a written statement of the reason therefor, be allowed a reasonable time for answering such reasons in writing and be given a public hearing by the officer making such removal, suspension, lay-off or reduction in grade, before the order therefor shall be made final..."
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
I have not seen any details other than word of mouth at this time in reference to more being addedRead More to the pension plan after two years. I would not be surprised. This would be another instance in which the charter was violated and would have to be mentioned to the Admin. Committee. I would be willing to gamble that they were put into the employee pension plan as well.
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.