.
Feedback

Police Union President Calls For Effort To Increase Staffing Levels

Todd Lynch says New London Police Department is well below recommended number of officers for adequate coverage

The president of the New London Police Union has called for an effort to increase police coverage and staffing in the city, claiming staffing levels are well below where they should be.

In a letter to Mayor Daryl Finizio, Todd Lynch says several union members expressed concerns at the last general membership meeting on “critical patrol staffing shortages that [are] jeopardizing public safety and our officer safety.” He cited recent violent incidents, including a brawl at the Wild Style Motorcycle Club and the murder of Javier Reyes; a New London Patch poll in which 18 of 32 respondents said they did not feel safe in downtown New London; and a NeighorhoodScout.com ranking of New London as the 87th most dangerous city in the country with populations of 25,000 or more.

Staffing recommendation

Lynch said a 2006 report by OSS Law Enforcement Advisors recommended that the New London Police Department have a force of 118 police officers. He said the number of officers has declined from a high of 95 to a current force of 76.

“Your prior public statements explaining why the number of officers who have fled is attributed to their resistance to new institutional changes implementing community based policing practices is inaccurate and misleading,” Lynch wrote. “You have been provided letters from recently resigned officers that paint [a] radically different picture of the police department that has nothing to do with community policing.”

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Although Lynch does not name Chief Margaret Ackley in the letter, he asks Finizio to “honestly address the internal police administration problems head on.” The police union website says the highest authorized force of 95 officers was in 2010, but that 27 officers have left since Ackley became chief in June of 2009. The union says 17 officers have been hired since that time, and that nine of these have left while three others are in the hiring process to go to other departments.

Lynch has also filed a lawsuit against Ackley accusing her of acting in a retaliatory manner against him and requested an investigation into her e-mails to resident Kathleen Mitchell in which Ackley recommends that Mitchell should look into the personnel records for Lynch and several other union members. Finizio said last week that an investigation into the latter issue has concluded and the findings should be released by the end of the week.

Lynch says union members are concerned that the staffing levels will put officers at risk by dispatching them to high-crime areas or volatile situations without adequate backup. He asks Finizio to reinstate a minimum patrol staffing of five sector cars and two downtown posts with additional staffing on evenings with increased attendance at bars. He also requests a recruitment drive to bring new officers to the department.

Finizio agreed that the police force should be increased, saying he supported increasing the number of officers by six over the 2011 levels during his campaign. He said he thinks the number of officers can be replenished over the next several budget cycles.

“The patrol strength in the city is not where I would ideally like it to be,” he said.

However, Finizio said he considered that the patrol strength is adequately staffed at this time and that the staffing levels are not having a direct effect on public safety. He said the administration has been working with the police union as well as Ackley and Deputy Chief Peter Reichard to address concerns.

Budget barriers

Finizio said the city finances are the main impediment to increasing the number of officers in the police department.

“This year, we’ve been working to remain within a very tight budget that at one point required potentially laying off 10 officers,” he said.

The layoffs also would have kept 11 positions vacant for the 2013 fiscal year. The administration later reached a tentative agreement with the police union promising that no layoffs would occur in the fiscal year.

A 2011 budget proposal by Interim City Manager Denise Rose included a recommendation to add a lieutenant, 11 police officers, and a part-time crime analyst to the NLPD ranks. However, the council approved only a full-time crime analyst in its final budget.

The current 2013 municipal budget, passed last week after the first budget was rejected at referendum, cuts $250,000 from the police department by leaving six vacant positions unbudgeted. Two city councilors, Marie Friess-McSparran and John Maynard, voiced their concerns about the police cuts in voting against the budget.

Councilor Adam Sprecace, who supported the budget, said he thought there were sufficient funds to begin the hiring process for the positions without impacting the 2013 budget. Finizio also said this course of action will be possible.

“We are still planning to move forward with the hiring process,” he said.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?