.
Feedback

Percentage Of Residents With Pistol Permits Among Lowest In State In New London

Study determines that two percent of the city's residents have such a permit

Only two percent of New London’s residents have a pistol permit according to a recent study, one of the lowest ratios in the state of Connecticut.

The New Haven Register recently measured the number of pistol permits issued in each of Connecticut’s municipalities against its population at the time of the 2010 census. The report says that about 170,000 pistol permits have been issued in Connecticut and that smaller towns generally have a greater percentage of residents with permits.

In New London, there were 553 people with pistol permits out of a population of 27,620. Only three communities in the state had smaller ratios: Mansfield (510 permits in a population of 26,543, or 1.9 percent), New Haven (2,061 permits in a population of 129,779, or 1.6 percent) and Hartford (1,912 permits in a population of 124,775, or 1.5).

Several communities issued fewer permits than New London, but they represent a larger percentage of the community’s population. The towns with the highest ratios were Canaan (167 permits in a population of 1,234, or 13.5 percent), Union (103 permits in a population of 854, or 12.1 percent) and Hartland and Harwinton (242 permits in a population of 2,114 and 646 permits in a population of 5,642, respectively, or 11.4 percent).

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Bridgeport, Connecticut’s largest city, also had the highest number of pistol permits in the state at 4,031. However, the city also had one of the lowest ratios, as the number represents 2.8 percent of the population of 144,229.

The report also notes an uptick in applications for pistol permits after violent incidents such as the 2007 Cheshire home invasion or December’s shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown. The number of New London residents applying for a pistol permit has gone up in the current fiscal year, with nearly as many permits issued halfway through the year as the total in the 2012 fiscal year.

According to Deputy Chief Peter Reichard of the New London Police Department, the department received 50 applications in the 2012 fiscal year; 45 permits were issued. From the start of the 2013 fiscal year to mid-January, the department received 71 applications and issued 40 permits. Reichard said the department’s data on pistol permit applications does not include the dates of application and that he was unable to say how many of the applications were submitted after the shooting in Newtown.

According to the city website, an application for a pistol permit requires several supporting materials including:

  • A pistol permit application containing personal information including criminal history, medical history, and whether a prior permit has been denied, suspended, or revoked
  • A completed fingerprint card performed at the police department
  • A photograph of the applicant
  • Proof of U.S. residency such as a passport or birth certificate
  • A firearms safety and use course certificate
  • Two fees of $50 and $19.25 payable to the Connecticut state treasurer for completion of criminal history background checks

The police department says the initial background check takes at least eight weeks and is followed by a suitability interview with the commander of the Investigative Services Division and additional $70 fee to the police department. The chief of police may then issue a temporary 60-day permit which allows a resident to carry but not purchase firearms in the state of Connecticut.

The final step to receive the permit is to bring the temporary permit, state application, proof of residency, and $70 fee to an applicable Department of Public Safety office within the 60-day period. Connecticut pistol permits are good for five years.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 06:02 am
The general public would not be supporting anyone. This is funded by those that contribute. I amRead More glad you and your wife are able to retire off of social security and what ever savings you were able to put together. But, unfortanately, there will probably not be enough when others are eligible to retire, even though every paycheck we have put in without being asked. Now, some other solution needs to be developed. This is one.
Zak Leavy May 18, 2013 at 10:45 am
Rich, Great blog and I couldn't agree more. American workers have a right to retire with dignityRead More and SB 54 takes another step to make that a reality. This bill is a common sense solution to the problem that many workers face as they near retirement. Considering the analysis of the bill shows only an extremely low, one-time, cost then hopefully that will be enough to have both chambers pass it.
Doc Halliday May 18, 2013 at 08:58 am
It is NOT up to the general public to support anyone in retIrement. It IS the responsibility ofRead More each individual to provide some savings for their retirement. We have to learn to NOT buy what we want but to buy responsibly what we need. My wife and I live on social security and very small savings. We have yard sales and sell off some of our "stuff" when we need cash. WE have always lived responsibly and had a good life.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!