.
Feedback

New London Arrest Log, March 1-4

Arrests by the New London Police Department

The following arrests were recorded at the New London Police Department. An arrest does not constitute a conviction and all are innocent until proven guilty.

Liz Marie Soto, 26, of 896 Bank Street, March 1, disorderly conduct, promise to appear in court.

Ronald Hart, 30, of 9 Woodlawn Drive in Waterford, March 1, third-degree robbery, fifth-degree larceny, $5,000 cash or surety bond.

Julius Jenkins, 40, of 98 Hawthorne Drive, March 1, third-degree assault, second-degree breach of peace, two counts of risk of injury to a minor, $2,500 non-surety bond.

Michael J. Evans, 45, of 73 Broad Street, March 1, second-degree breach of peace, third-degree assault, $2,500 non-surety bond.

Alexis Soto, 28, of 339 Vauxhall Street, March 1, second-degree breach of peace, third-degree trespassing, second-degree threatening, carrying a dangerous weapon, $5,000 non-surety bond.

Angel L. Soto, 54, of 339 Vauxhall Street, March 1, second-degree breach of peace, third-degree criminal trespass, $1,000 non-surety bond.

Miguel Valentin, 20, of 339 Vauxhall Street, March 1, second-degree breach of peace, third-degree trespassing, second-degree threatening, carrying a dangerous weapon, $500 non-surety bond.

Dennis J. Nolan, 45, of 17 Lakeside Drive in Ledyard, March 1, possession of narcotics, no bond listed.

Daniel E. Casko, 18, of 8 Myers Street in Putnam, March 1, two counts of third-degree strangulation, second-degree strangulation, three counts of disorderly conduct, second-degree threatening, $100,000 bond.

Jose E. Ortiz, 23, of 10 Railroad Ave. in Norwich, March 2, violation of probation, $30,000 bond.

Shane D. Lancaster, 36, of 69 Hempstead Street, March 2, violation of protective order, disorderly conduct, no bond listed.

Daniel Sugar, 41, of 1113 Kitmaug Road in Uncasville, March 2, sixth-degree larceny, $1,000 non-surety bond.

Jose A. Acevedo, 25, of 69 Blackhall Street, March 3, driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, driving with a suspended license, $2,500 non-surety bond.

Arielle M. Pearson, 20, of 22 Broad Street in Groton, March 3, driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, driving in the improper lane, $2,500 non-surety bond.

Hayley A. Plas, 26, of 17 Ridgewood Ave. in Niantic, March 3, driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, driving without headlights, $2,500 non-surety bond.

David L. Wilson Jr., 21, of 49 Blackhall Street, March 3, possession of narcotics, possession of narcotics with intent to sell, $10,000 cash or surety bond.

Michael C. Dipollina, 44, of 55 Huntsbrook Road in Quaker Hill, March 3, first-degree criminal trespass, $500 non-surety bond.

Jen Flaherty, 33, of 25 Ocean Ave., March 3, driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, driving without a license, failure to drive right, weapon in motor vehicle, $2,000 non-surety bond in total.

Eric Caroman, 20, of 121 Hazelmere Road in New Britain, March 4, second-degree failure to appear in court, $500 cash or surety bond.

 

For questions about this blotter, please e-mail dirk.langeveld@patch.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 21, 2013 at 08:57 am
Yes. That is correct. The city has been putting unqualified people into the employees DefinedRead More Pension without following the proper process of placing the requests into the Pension Committee.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?