.
Feedback

Gary Clarke To Serve 25 Years In 2007 Killing

Judge describes shooting of New London shopkeeper Jared Silva as "another senseless, sad scenario"

A 25-year-old man will serve 25 years behind bars for a botched 2007 robbery which left a storekeeper dead.

Gary Clarke was sentenced today in the to 40 years in prison, suspended after 25 years, with five years of probation. During the probationary period, Clarke must seek employment and undergo substance abuse screening and treatment.

Clarke was charged with murder, murder during the commission of a felony, and first-degree robbery in the death of 46-year-old Jared Silva. Silva, the owner of Jared’s Packy on Ocean Ave., was shot in the head after leaving the store on Oct. 12, 2007. Clarke pleaded guilty on May 16 to first-degree manslaughter with a firearm.

Receive updates to this story and other breaking news in your inbox or smartphone by signing up for our newsletter here

Clarke was crouching over Silva when police arrived, and said he saw two men attack Silva. Police found Clarke’s phone, which he said he had lost during the night, near Silva’s body. Cosmo Frieson, Clarke’s 24-year-old co-defendant, said he and Clarke tried to rob Silva and that Clarke shot Silva after the storekeeper fought back and called for help. Clarke later gave a statement saying the gun, which had been stolen from a vehicle, went off by accident during a struggle.

Frieson was charged with murder in the commission of a felony and first-degree robbery, but pleaded guilty in June of 2009 to the robbery charge. The plea included an agreement that he would give evidence against Clarke at trial.

Trial difficulties

During Clarke’s first trial in January of 2011, the defense said several witnesses had changed their testimony from that first given to police and suggested that Frieson or several other witnesses could have killed Silva. The trial , with jurors 11-1 in favor of acquittal on the murder charge and 9-3 in favor of conviction on the robbery and murder in the commission of a felony charges.

State’s Attorney Michael Regan acknowledged that uncooperative witnesses hampered the first trial and would have presented difficulties in the second. He said one key witness, , absconded prior to the second trial and remains at large with a warrant out for his arrest. Gomez testified at the first trial that Clarke asked to borrow his sweatshirt and told him to tell police that they had been together at the time of the shooting.

Regan said , who testified that Clarke came to his house to retrieve a weapon brought there by Frieson after the shooting, also refused to testify at the second trial. He also said that Smith had been a “horrible witness” whose credibility was easily challenged.

Regan said Clarke was initially unaware that he could enter a plea to a lesser charge, an action he decided to take shortly after the start of the second trial. Regan said he expected that the sentence would not fully satisfy Silva’s family, but he felt that it was a proper action given Clarke’s lack of a criminal record as well as the failure of the first trial to secure a conviction.

A loss to the community

“The victim in this case was totally innocent,” said Regan. “Mr. Silva was beloved by his family, by his friends, his neighbors, his neighbors in the Squire Street area.”

Both Dorothy Silva, Jared’s mother, and Nancy Donovan, Jared’s sister, thanked the prosecutor’s office for their compassion and work in the case. They said Jared’s death represented a loss to the neighborhood.

“This was a man who went out of his way to connect with people, to make them feel special,” said Nancy.

Donovan said the death had a devastating effect on Dorothy, as her husband had died 10 months prior to the shooting and Jared had been looking after her. She said Jared used his store to interact with the neighborhood, loaning money to those who needed it and giving advice.

Dorothy said she would never forget the night police officers told her of her son’s death. She said it also represents a loss for Clarke’s family.

“I hope that he somehow emerges from this a better man,” she said.

Jeremiah Donovan, Clarke’s defense attorney, read excerpts from the statement Clarke gave as part of his plea. Clarke expressed regret for his actions, saying he believed Silva was beloved in the neighborhood and that the shooting made neighbors feel less safe.

“They intended that the gun would be a prop,” said Donovan. “They never intended to use it…Gary never had any intention to take a life.”

“Another senseless, sad scenario”

Judge Patrick J. Clifford, in approving the sentence, said the case represents the harm that can be done when irresponsible people use firearms. He questioned why the gun was loaded if Clarke and Frieson only intended to threaten Silva with it.

“It’s another senseless, sad scenario, destroying an innocent individual and everyone’s set of security,” said Clifford.

Clarke’s plea also dismisses unrelated charges of first-degree sexual assault, first-degree unlawful restraint, and third-degree assault. Clarke was accused of raping and assaulting a 42-year-old woman in June of 2007, and investigators charged him after determining that his DNA matched that of evidence taken after the crime and the woman identified him from a photo lineup.

Regan said the woman has not contacted the State’s Attorney’s Office since the crime, and that efforts to call her have been unsuccessful.

Frieson faces up to 20 years in prison on the robbery charge. His next scheduled court date is on Tuesday, but will not include sentencing. Clifford said the Frieson pleaded before a different judge and requested an updated pre-sentencing report before Frieson’s prison term is set.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Zak Leavy May 18, 2013 at 10:45 am
Rich, Great blog and I couldn't agree more. American workers have a right to retire with dignityRead More and SB 54 takes another step to make that a reality. This bill is a common sense solution to the problem that many workers face as they near retirement. Considering the analysis of the bill shows only an extremely low, one-time, cost then hopefully that will be enough to have both chambers pass it.
Doc Halliday May 18, 2013 at 08:58 am
It is NOT up to the general public to support anyone in retIrement. It IS the responsibility ofRead More each individual to provide some savings for their retirement. We have to learn to NOT buy what we want but to buy responsibly what we need. My wife and I live on social security and very small savings. We have yard sales and sell off some of our "stuff" when we need cash. WE have always lived responsibly and had a good life.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!