.
Feedback

A Chapter Closed For Matthew Chew's Family

Parents of slain New London man look to move on after sentencings, but still face difficulties

In her last action before the adjournment of the New London Superior Court on Friday, Judge Susan B. Handy gave an order to the State’s Attorney’s Office. The prosecutors have been in possession of the items that 25-year-old Matthew Chew had when he was fatally stabbed on Oct. 29, 2010, as well as some evidence seized from his apartment. With the sentencing of the last of six defendants in the case, Handy asked that the property be returned to Chew’s family.

This action will close out the court’s role in the hearings and punishments for six men accused of involvement in Chew’s murder. At each sentencing this week, Handy has praised the Chew family for their courage in attending court each day to speak about the impact of his death and expressed the wish that they will find closure.

“It’s a chapter that’s closed,” said Richard Chew, Matthew’s father. “The whole closure thing is still elusive to us.”

The first sentencing in the case happened almost 10 months ago, when 19-year-old Idris Elahi was sentenced to 35 years in prison. Elahi was one of six men accused of attacking Chew as he walked home from his job as a chef at 2 Wives Pizza, and he was the assailant identified by investigators as the man who stabbed Chew six times. Chew died of these injuries early the next morning after being flown to the trauma center at Yale-New Haven Hospital.

Between Monday and Friday, the court meted out punishment to the remaining defendants. For Rashad Perry, the 19-year-old who dared Elahi to stab someone as the group went looking for a random person to beat up, 15 years in prison. The same punishment for Matias Perry (no relation), the 19-year-old who opened the assault by asking Chew for a lighter and punched Chew as he reached into his pocket to retrieve one.

The remaining defendants each received eight years: Brian Rabell, the 21-year-old who had been accepted into the Marines and was criticized for not doing more to stop the plan; Tyree Bundy, 20, to whom Elahi handed a knife after the attack; and finally Marquis Singleton, the 19-year-old charged with taking part in the initial assault on Chew.

Marilyn Chew, Matthew’s mother, said she and Richard discussed the agreed upon sentences with the State’s Attorney’s Office over the course of two days before the men entered pleas to the reduced charge of first-degree manslaughter late last year.

“We spent five hours of heavy discussion to come to a point where we could all agree on,” said Marilyn.

“We negotiated, but our starting point was much longer,” said Richard.

The sentencings were all scheduled for this week so that Chew’s parents, who live in California, would only have to make one trip. Their statements to the court and defendants were nearly identical from day to day, speaking of the kind of person Chew was and the pain of losing him. Richard said the difficulty of the proceedings was such that he could not imagine the strain the family would have faced if each case went to trial.

“It was demanding, much more than we expected,” he said. “We expected it to be easier each day, and it was actually harder.”

Marilyn said one of the most difficult parts of the proceedings came when Peter Scillieri, defense attorney for Matias Perry, gave a lengthy statement questioning several characterizations raised by the state including that the defendants were on a “hunt” and that the case had done harm to the community as a whole. She said Scillieri spoke with them beforehand but said the remarks left the family “devastated.”

“We never expected the length, and a lot of the things that were said may have been more appropriate for a closing argument,” she said.

Richard and Marilyn maintain a close connection with Connecticut, where Chew grew up and graduated from Ledyard High School. They still own the house and rent out the house where he was raised, and some of Chew’s family lives in the state. Marilyn said she and Richard are looking to purchase a house here to be closer to these relatives and plan to live here in the spring and summer months.

In their time in New London, Richard and Marilyn have often visited Chew’s former workplace at 2 Wives Pizza. The restaurant’s owner, Amy Sarcia, keeps a picture of Chew in the kitchen and oversees efforts to raise funds for an arts scholarship in his name. These include a donation of $1 from the sale of every pear and gorgonzola pizza—a dish invented by Chew—toward the scholarship.

The restaurant is located near the intersection where a passing motorist spotted Chew lying in the street on the evening of Oct. 29, 2010. However, Marilyn said she tries not to think of that.

“We focus on the fact that Matt enjoyed working there,” she said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?