.
Feedback

So Much News, So Little Time

The annual Election Day rush

This past Tuesday marked a new experience in reporting for me: fast elections.

I’d gotten a taste of it with the in September. When the unofficial results showed Daryl Finizio with a significant lead over Michael Buscetto III, the candidates got a head start on their speeches and post-announcement get-togethers. A freelancer was on hand to capture these, while I waited for the official results. By the time these came in—and confirmed the same result with different numbers—the candidates and their supporters had long since abandoned their headquarters.

It was quite a difference from the admittedly humdrum election coverage I’d previously done at the bureau of a newspaper. The most significant one I took part in was in 2008, where I summarized a few local races while collecting overall results from towns across a couple of counties. I think they say Maine is one of those slow living places, which might explain why some towns boasting maybe 100 voters took until nearly midnight to fax in their numbers. From about the time Barack Obama was confirmed as President to 2 a.m., election coverage was more a matter of sitting around and firing off the occasional e-mail with a few figures to the main office.

The New London race was a different can of worms entirely. Six candidates for mayor, three political headquarters with people in various races, a hot-button referendum issue…it was a fairly overwhelming prospect. Preparing for the election became reminiscent of my preparations for : charge up the laptop and phone, pre-write as much of each article as possible, and wait for the rush of information.

For all the suggestions that the results might be a long time coming, they were just about as rapid in arriving as the primary numbers had been. At the Republican headquarters, the numbers from each district arrived within minutes of each other and were tabulated on an oversized ballot printout. Within minutes of that, Rob Pero’s concession speech. And almost immediately after that, the exodus to the after-party at . From there, it was a scramble to the Democratic headquarters, trying to catch a few people before they left for their own celebration.

I’d be extremely remiss to leave out Jayne Keedle and Jessie King from this account. Both of them did their own mad scrambles, sending along photos and quotes and other information as they covered the Buscetto and Finizio campaign headquarters and interviewed or made a few calls to other candidates. Each of them worked tirelessly to get reactions and send along quotes and photos, and the coverage would have been far more destitute without their help.

Unlike 2008, this election had a far more dramatic ending. Along with a few other members of the media, I waited for the last tally from absentee ballots to decide the too-close-to-call referendum question on and the Board of Education race. And despite the fairly quick tally of most of the results it was, like 2008, a late night. By the time I posted the last article on the site, it was about 2:30 a.m. on Wednesday morning.

It was about that time that I realized I’d had no coffee or caffeine throughout the day and had been working with various degrees of intensity for some 17 hours. It only comes one night a year, for which I’m glad, but Election Day is always a blast.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?