.
Feedback

John Winthrop, Jr’s Surprisingly Fascinating Life

New London’s founder has more tricks up his prim Puritan sleeve than you might expect.

If there’s anything that makes a long-dead and somber-seeming figure from the past appear even longer-dead and more somber, it’s a Puritan hat. The statue of long-time Connecticut Governor John Winthrop, Jr. wears such a hat. But stop at Hempstead Street and Bulkeley Place and look at him close-up someday. His cape is tied at the neck with a little bow, and his shoes have rigid tongues that look very uncomfortable. He wears a determined expression and holds a rolled-up paper in his hand. Despite being made of bronze, he seems, suddenly, like a real person. Even the hat looks less comical, and more practical, shading his eyes as he looks towards the river.

I looked up Winthrop, wondering about this man who figures in almost every aspect of the first days of New London and who would have, even in the heat of a Connecticut summer, worn stockings, breeches gathered at the knees, and a bulky coat. Here are a few of the things I didn’t expect to find.

1. He got around. Born in England, Winthrop went to school in Ireland. He later traveled to France – as part of a military expedition – and then Holland, Italy, and Turkey. This was all before coming to the New World to join his father, John Winthrop, the Governor of Massachusetts Bay Colony. Once he was here, he didn’t stay in one place either. He wrote what may be the earliest Connecticut guidebook, after a journey from Boston to Saybrook and then east along the coast to Providence in 1645.

2. He could be mysterious. Some letters between Winthrop and Martha Fones, his first wife, were written in code. And it was apparently a good code – no one cracked it until the 20th century.

3. He made us official. In 1660, the Restoration left Puritan Connecticut, established without permission from the Crown, in legal limbo. So Winthrop traveled to England to secure a Charter from King Charles II. The document he brought back in 1662 outlined the Colony’s borders: “on the North by the Line of the Massachusetts-Plantation; and on the South by the Sea,” and from “Narraganset-Bay on the East, to the South Sea [i.e., Pacific Ocean] on the West Part.” It also incorporated the New Haven Colony into the Connecticut Colony, about which the New Haven Colony was none too happy. This is, by the way, the Charter that was hidden in the Oak when King James wanted it back 25 years later. (Though I’m not positive, I like to think this is what the Winthrop statue is holding. Or perhaps it’s something written in code.)

4. He was given Fisher’s Island as a present. The Massachusetts Bay Colony presented it to him, along with the land that became New London, after their victory in the Pequot War and conquest of the former Pequot lands.

5. He was against witch hunting. Whenever he could, Winthrop fought to overturn witchcraft convictions and protect women he believed to be falsely accused. Due largely to Winthrop’s influence, Connecticut quickly went from an aggressive prosecutor of alleged witches to a colony without witchcraft trials or executions. But it wasn’t because Winthrop thought the charges were cruel or ridiculous. It was more that he was so well-informed and practiced in all matters occult that he knew these so-called witches weren’t the real deal. And that’s because...

6. He originally intended New London to be Hogwarts. Well, sort of. Winthrop was seriously into alchemy. His early vision for a new version of London centered around the idea of alchemists from all over Europe gathering here to collaborate on experiments in medicine, metallurgy, agriculture, and the other varied disciplines that fell under the umbrella of alchemy at the time. Though that never happened, New London did become a sort of medical hot-spot, where Winthrop and his assistants treated the sick (for free) with powerful mineral-based cures believed to be divinely blessed.

And you thought he was just the guy who built the and got his name on a street sign.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Doc Halliday May 19, 2013 at 08:23 am
Should the general public be required to support the retirement of our elected/hired governmentRead More officials? Should those retirement checks be based on base salary and not base salary plus overtime/extra pay/bonuses etc? Should ALL government officials be on a 401 system instead of a government (public supported) retirement system? ie: government official retires at 95% pay, in a few years with cost of living increases that official is making more in retirement than when working. The public cannot afford to continue such high retirements. Social Security is being tapped by government officials to pay OTHER items rather than for what it was intended and future retirees who contributed to SS may be left out.
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 06:02 am
The general public would not be supporting anyone. This is funded by those that contribute. I amRead More glad you and your wife are able to retire off of social security and what ever savings you were able to put together. But, unfortanately, there will probably not be enough when others are eligible to retire, even though every paycheck we have put in without being asked. Now, some other solution needs to be developed. This is one.
Zak Leavy May 18, 2013 at 10:45 am
Rich, Great blog and I couldn't agree more. American workers have a right to retire with dignityRead More and SB 54 takes another step to make that a reality. This bill is a common sense solution to the problem that many workers face as they near retirement. Considering the analysis of the bill shows only an extremely low, one-time, cost then hopefully that will be enough to have both chambers pass it.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!