.
Feedback

In 1814 British Raid On Essex, U.S. Lost More Ships Than At Pearl Harbor

An early morning attack on privateers at Pettipaug Point occurred 198 years ago this week. Privateering? It's an idea U.S. Rep. Ron Paul has tried to resurrect.

Most of the military action in Connecticut against the British during the War of 1812 occurred in and around Long Island Sound. In fact, it was an American attempt to blow up a British ship anchored in New London Harbor that precipitated the British attack on Pettipaug Point, known today as Essex, CT.

A New London-area sea captain and privateer named Jeremiah Holmes agreed to blow up a British Man of War named the La Hogue commanded by a Capt. Capel. The effort was part of an attempt to free Commodore Stephen Decatur’s squadron from a British blockade of Long Island Sound. Under cover of darkness, Holmes steered his barge near to the British ship and deployed a torpedo to blow it up; however, the hauling line used to deploy the torpedo got caught in the anchor line of the British ship, and the bomb exploded prematurely, doing no damage to the target.

So incensed were the British at the attack that the next day they sent out ships to patrol Long Island Sound to find the attackers. Just off of Old Saybrook — near the mouth of the Connecticut River — the British collared an American rowing a skiff with muffled oars. Immediately suspicious, they threw him in irons and threatened his life. Dubbed “Torpedo Jack” by his captors, the imprisoned American offered to guide the Brits up to Pettipaug Point if they would spare his life. A deal was struck.

Early in the morning of April 8, 1814, about 220 British soldiers in several boats from four warships anchored in Long Island Sound made their way up the Connecticut River about 6 miles to attack Pettipaug Point. The traitorous “Torpedo Jack” guided them. Area militiamen stood ready to oppose the invaders, but the two sides never engaged. It seems that the commanders struck a deal to spare their homes there if they allowed the Brits to torch the ships.

The British marauders proceeded to destroy a total of 28 American ships — 10 more than were destroyed by the Japanese at Pearl Harbor! The raid on Essex was the single most destructive raid on American shipping in our history.

When news spread throughout the country about the deal to save the village, tremendous anger came their way. Most people saw the capitulation as cowardice; however, others believe that the deal that was struck was a pragmatic solution to a problem: the Americans were outgunned and outmanned. Interestingly, the people of Essex still “celebrate” the raid with a patriotic parade on the second Saturday in May known as the “Burning of the Ships Commemoration.” A fife and drum corps known as the “Sailing Masters of 1812” leads the commemoration as a way of acknowledging its significance in “galvanizing support for the defeat of the British” in the War of 1812.

In addition to torching 28 vessels, the British took two along with them as they headed back down the river about 6 hours later; however, the tide was low, impeding their progress. As a result, militiamen summoned from Killingworth lined the banks and fired shots at the British. At least two British soldiers were killed — perhaps more.

At the time of the raid on Pettipaug Point, it was common practice both in Europe and in America for governments to commission privately owned vessels to fight for them during wartime. In fact, Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution lists as one of the powers of Congress the power to issue letters of marque and reprisal — legally sanctioned authority for privately held ships to fight for the United States government. Their prize would be the spoils of war obtained from any vessel which they seized. It was considered an honorable profession at the time. Pettipaug Point was a hotbed of activity for privateers, and the British knew it; consequently, the principal reason for attacking the port was to remove the threat that privateering posed to the British fleet in Long Island Sound. Thus, Essex became one of the few communities in the United States which can say that it was once under attack from a foreign power.

Interestingly, the power of Congress to issue a letter of marque and reprisal —dormant since the War of 1812 but still part of the Constitution — recently was resurrected by Congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul. Congressman Paul introduced the “Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001” to combat terrorism following the 9/11 attacks. The act would have commissioned the President to issue letters of marque against groups like Al-Qaeda as an alternative to declaring war. Congressman Paul also proposed legislation to issue letters of marque and reprisal against the Somali pirates in April of 2009 as an alternative to war. His legislation did not pass, though one has to admit that it’s an interesting concept and one that goes a long way toward explaining why the attack by the British on Pettipaug Point occurred — an attack that destroyed 10 more American ships than the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor did in 1941!

Notes, Sources, and Links

1. Sir Francis Drake--famous for his raids on the Spanish--was a privateer.

2. The Battle of Stonington by James Tertius de Kay (1990)

3. A future column will deal with the other Connecticut community assaulted by the British during the War of 1812--Stonington.

4. website of "Sailing Masters of 1812."

5. Record of Service of Connecticut Men compiled by the Adjutant General's Office (1889)

6. The parade in May is sometimes called "The Loser's Day Parade."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 10:01 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:52 pm
And what I meant by that comment that I don't think this whole thing has anything to do withRead More t-shirt , it's just a shutout to the Mayer and what he is bringing to the table .
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:50 pm
We are young we like change and we like a good laugh that's all the t- shirt is ,
--Robert May 23, 2013 at 03:15 am
Pathetic that anyone would post this as a legit news story, more so that it seems a big corporationRead More is behind these ads.
Jason Morris May 22, 2013 at 01:30 pm
Jessica's previous two posts in other city's patch pages, with the exact same title (just schoolRead More district name changed) have been moderated/deleted. Recommend this corporate advertisement to get the same fate. The concerns are true, but it's an ad nontheless.
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 09:59 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 09:57 am
@Josh: Too much tolerance is also a slippery slope. Like it or not, Zak is a public servant, whichRead More makes him automatically subject to scrutiny of his actions by the public. We can and should speak out when our public servants (elected or graciously appointed in Zak's case) - ESPECIALLLY ones that are supposed to be emissaries to the Capitol - engage in behavior that could cast a bad light on our community. Would you be ok with Obama wearing a shirt that says "America hates you"?
Joshua Pendleton May 22, 2013 at 06:44 pm
Love the shirt or hate it, it is Zacs right to wear what he wants, when he wants to. Democracy isRead More founded on tolerance. This tolerance includes public officials hanging out in their back yard. Intolerance of things of this nature is a slippery slope.
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 03:40 pm
I would say that the Collective Bargaining Agreement would have to be looked at for his Union.Read More Mr. Hathaway is not in Local 1378. He is MEU. I would say, that this is an interesting question for our members. Local 1378's CBA does not go into this language, however it does state that prior to reorganization, the union must be notified to bargain the impacts (not exact language). This is not to say that the union has final say, or say at all as to how the administration shall operate, but the impact to the employees is what matters as well as the position in general. I will look into this language in reference to the Charter and forward it to the MEU as well. Thank you.
Kathleen Mitchell May 22, 2013 at 03:17 pm
The following is from NL's Charter, Sec 46. Does it mean that Bill Hathaway would be entitled to aRead More public hearing? "...Any officer or employee so removed, suspended, laid off or reduced in grade shall, if he so request, be furnished with a written statement of the reason therefor, be allowed a reasonable time for answering such reasons in writing and be given a public hearing by the officer making such removal, suspension, lay-off or reduction in grade, before the order therefor shall be made final..."
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
I have not seen any details other than word of mouth at this time in reference to more being addedRead More to the pension plan after two years. I would not be surprised. This would be another instance in which the charter was violated and would have to be mentioned to the Admin. Committee. I would be willing to gamble that they were put into the employee pension plan as well.
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.