.
Feedback

Ah, New London!

It took a while for me to recognize Eugene O’Neill’s impact on the city and the city’s impact on him.

The thing is, I never particularly liked Eugene O’Neill.

I first encountered his plays in high school, and thought they were boring. High school theater classes involved a lot of O’Neill plays, partly because you could carve so many scenes out of them and partly because our teacher felt he’d accomplished something by suggesting Important Playwrights without explaining why they were Important.

I avoided O’Neill – there was something silly, even in the context of high school drama class, about 16-year-olds pretending to be drug-addicted mothers of alcoholic and consumptive young men. I preferred Chekhov (more fun) or Ibsen (also somewhat boring and beyond us, but foreign, and therefore marginally cooler) or Ionesco (so out there it was arguably impossible to get wrong.)

In college there remained a touch of O’Neill, but Mamet, Molière, Euripides and many others took precedence. I spent most of my time as an acting major on Shakespeare, moving professionally and personally away from anything resembling moping around your house in Connecticut.

And so, my “discovery” of O’Neill’s life story had nothing to do with studying or attempting to work in theater. It was living in New London and slowly noticing how his memory permeated the city that finally gave me some sense of connection to O’Neill. So many of his plots and characters were influenced by, or taken directly from, the summers he lived on Pequot Avenue in the early 20th century.

The O’Neill family’s “cottage” on Pequot was technically a summer house, but it was the only permanent home they had. During the winter O’Neill’s father James, an actor, brought Eugene, his mother Ella, and his brother Jamie along on tour. Monte Cristo Cottage, a house that by today’s standards (wrap-around porch! water views!) would be desirable real estate if it were not maintained as a museum, was shabbily built, and Ella was ashamed of it. It was near the fashionable Pequot Colony but not of it. O’Neill wrote of attending a “hop” at the Pequot Hotel: “I was bored to death and said ‘never again...’ ”

Long Day’s Journey Into Night, among other plays, is set here. The Tyrones are barely veiled stand-ins for the O’Neills, and the family’s evasive discussions of drug addiction, drinking, and illness that bored me in high school could be a transcript of their lives. The play feels different when you read it knowing that the ominous moan of the foghorn is coming from the Thames. Similarly, finding that O’Neill was known for staring dreamily out at the water means more, once you know exactly which water it was.

He covered the news for the New London Telegraph, though his reporting read more like poetry. Luckily the Telegraph published poems, too. After being treated for tuberculosis at a sanatorium in Wallingford, he lived for a time at a boarding house a short walk from his family’s cottage. While there he swam daily, as his doctor had ordered, even when the sand was covered with snow. And he wrote plays.

He drank everywhere, but in New London he drank especially at the (which was then, before its Prohibition closing and re-opening, called the Oak.) He drank at the bar at the , and presumably, like his father, toned down his drinking in front of the big-wigs at the on State Street, where James O’Neill was a member.

The O’Neill family attended, although Eugene stopped going to Mass in his teens. He hung out with his friends at . There is a photograph of them there, and in it – like in all the pictures I’ve seen – he looks unexceptional, betraying no hint of the innovation in his work or the turmoil in his private life.

Perhaps if I’d known in high school that O’Neill once lived in coastal Connecticut and was looked down on by the surrounding snobs and stared out at the Sound, feeling trapped – just like me! – I would have chosen him over Tennessee Williams. Though it’s possible I would have liked him even less. Art may be, as Picasso said, a lie that makes us realize the truth, but it’s more enjoyable when it’s not your truth.

I will never read The Iceman Cometh for entertainment. But when I cross Eugene O’Neill Drive now, I remember it was once Main Street, where he and his bohemian friends gathered in an apartment above an office to socialize. When I see the statue of him by the City Pier, a small boy in a then-bustling seaport, his life makes sense to me in a way those stilted, stifling scenes never did.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!