.
Feedback

L+M Physician Friday -- Dr. David Reisfeld

Meet a member of the L+M medical staff each Physician Friday.

Dr. David Reisfeld was just 13 years old when a family doctor making a house call diagnosed the pain in his side as appendicitis.

No one at the time could have guessed that the young Reisfeld – about to go under the knife for an appendectomy – would eventually go on to medical school, become a surgeon, and ultimately perform thousands of similar operations on his own patients.

Today, though, as one of Lawrence + Memorial Hospital’s veteran general surgeons, Reisfeld can look back and see that his childhood medical episode proved to be a seminal moment in guiding the future of his career.

“It’s funny,” he says. “I don’t think we always know where we get the bug to do certain things, but as far back as I can remember I always wanted to be a physician, and for some reason I always wanted to be a surgeon.

“When I had my appendix out at 13, I remember the whole episode so clearly. I thought the whole thing was amazing. I wasn’t scared. I just thought the whole thing was fascinating.”

Dr. Reisfeld’s interest in medicine never wavered as he pursued a medical degree at the State University of New York Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn and then continued his surgical training at Montefiore Medical Center, affiliated with the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, in the Bronx.

Dr. Reisfeld practiced in New York City for several years after completing his training in general surgery, but the biggest move of his career was about to happen. In 1990, he decided to leave the big city and come to New London, joining a practice with Dr. Dean Willis, another veteran surgeon on the L+M staff.

“I was born in New York City and grew up on Long Island,” he says. “I spent a long time in New York, and when you’re young, that’s great, but when you’re older and married and starting a family, you look for a smaller quieter community.”

Dr. Reisfeld never regretted his move to southeastern Connecticut.

“It has been a wonderful place to raise a family, and my wife loves it here, too,” he says. “We’ve raised two boys, and it has been a great opportunity professionally and a wonderful place to practice general surgery.”

General surgery appealed to many young medical school students in the 1970s and ’80s, Dr. Reisfeld says, because it was a broad and diverse field, whereas today many surgeons are highly specialized.

“The scope has narrowed,” he says, “but people have been predicting the demise of general surgery for a long time, and it never seems to happen. That’s because we still do a lot of things that other surgeons don’t do.”

Whether it’s removing an appendix, cancers of the colon or the breast, removing a skin cancer or a gall bladder, Dr. Reisfeld has years of experience.

Dr. Reisfeld says the personal rewards of his work might have been less satisfying if he’d stayed at a big city hospital, where patients typically come in for an episodic problem and are often never seen again.

“In a community hospital setting, it’s very personal,” he says. “General surgery is sort of the primary care of the surgical world. It’s episodic in nature, but, on the other hand, you often act in a primary care mode and see patients over and over again. You become very involved in the community. You take care of family members of patients that you’ve had, and you see those families and they get comfortable with you. It’s a very rewarding.”

When he’s not busy at the hospital, Dr. Reisfeld says he plays a little golf and tennis and enjoys relaxing with his family (including his dog, a Cavalier King Charles Spaniel). He’s also a sports buff – and a proud fan of New York Mets, as well as his sons’ college teams, the Wolverines of the University of Michigan and the Tar Heels of the University of North Carolina.

He also enjoys 1950s and ’60s jazz, which he sometimes plays as part of his focus and preparation before the start of an operation. “It’s the kind of music that annoys everyone else in the operating room,” he jokes.

Dr. Reisfeld says his years at L+M have gone by “in a hurry,” but he looks forward to at least another decade of surgery before he thinks about retirement.

 “I love the hospital,” he says. “It’s an excellent place. I feel proud to have spent my career all in one hospital. There has been so much turmoil in healthcare, and it’s nice to go through it in one place, and to have some consistency, even as things are changing. The people I’ve worked with have been great, and L+M has been a nice anchor in my life. It’s really like an extended family.”

To learn more about Dr. Reisfeld, click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.