.
Feedback

L+M Physician Friday -- Dr. Brett Citarella

Meet another member of the L+M medical staff each Physician Friday.

Dr. Brett Citarella knows that other doctors feel as he does – that each tends to see their own area of expertise as uniquely satisfying both personally and professionally.

But, with that disclaimer, Dr. Citarella is proud to say that nothing is more rewarding and satisfying than the work he does in the Newborn Intensive Care Unit at Lawrence + Memorial Hospital.

Neonatology, he says, affects him deeply because he sees the most vulnerable of all human beings – premature and sick infants, some less than two pounds in size – who are struggling to gain the strength and maturity to survive on their own.

“Does it touch me every time? Yes,” he says. “It does.”

Beyond that fragile infant, Dr. Citarella is also in close contact with the parents of those tiny babies, trying to ease their fear and explain the details of an emotional and medical experience that is likely the most dramatic and worrisome that a new mom or dad has ever had to deal with.

That role of educating and comforting the parents is something that Dr. Citarella enjoys because he knows from experience that, in most cases, the baby is going to grow, get stronger and be healthy.

 “Probably the most rewarding thing is that process we go through with the family and the understanding they come to,” Dr. Citarella says. “It means so much to me when they see that this isn’t going to be as bad as they expected. And then comes the moment when they realize that this might take a while, but things are going to be OK.”

Dr. Citarella grew up in New York, attended Holy Cross as an undergraduate, and went to medical school SUNY Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, NY. He trained in pediatric medicine at Geisinger Medical Center in Pennsylvania, then came back to New York for fellowship training in neonatology at Long Island Jewish Medical Center.

Knowing that he wanted to stay in the northeast, Dr. Citarella jumped at the opportunity to come to L+M’s Newborn Intensive Care Unit when the luck of timing presented a position following his fellowship. But there were other factors that made L+M an attractive option.

“Part of it was the uniqueness of what we have here,” Dr. Citarella says. “We have a community hospital with a high-level neonatal intensive care unit, which is unique.

“Also,” he explains, “L+M has allowed all the neonatologists here to also work part time at Yale, and to be on the staff at Yale as well. The benefit of that is it keeps us in the academic environment and on the front lines of the latest and greatest things in the world of neonatology. And, it allows us then to bring that knowledge and skill back to our little corner of southeastern Connecticut. It’s another one of the unique parts of what our NICU has to offer.”

The NICU at L+M – the only one in all of eastern Connecticut – can handle most cases of premature and sick babies, Dr. Citarella says, but another advantage of L+M’s close relationship with Yale is that infants with the most acute conditions can be transported to Yale with a continuity of care.

“It reassures parents,” he says.

L+M’s NICU typically handles all babies born after 28 weeks gestation, and/or with a weight of about 1 kilo or more, which is about two pounds. Length of stay for a NICU patient typically ranges from 4 to six weeks, but, for a baby at 28 weeks gestation, a stay could last for several months.

“We tell parents that their baby was supposed to go home on their due date, so, if they’re six weeks early, they might be in the hospital for six weeks,” Dr. Citarella says.

A majority of the babies in L+M’s NICU are born prematurely, although some are sick from mother’s who have had substance abuse issues.

“It can be hard on the baby,” Dr. Citarella says, “but we have medicine to help them through their withdrawal. These babies can be a little bit more irritable, but they can also be consoled just like non-exposed babies, and it may just mean they need to be wrapped more or held more, so there are non-pharmacological ways to help these babies, too.”

Dr. Citarella knew early in his medical career that he wanted to work with children. “In most pediatric cases, we’re usually working to make something go away. I like that concept.”

He chose neonatology because “I realized I enjoyed being in the hospital more than in the outpatient field, and neonatology was the thing I enjoyed the most. Neonatology takes that concept that ‘we are going to fix you’ to the extreme. Most of our patients get over what brought them to the ICU, and they get better and they go home, and it’s a feeling of accomplishment that you were able to help the baby and also the family get through what was first perceived as unthinkable circumstances.

 “I see other physicians taking care of other patient populations, but, this is definitely what’s right for me, Dr. Citarella says. “I couldn’t imagine doing anything else.”

To learn more about Dr. Citarella, click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 21, 2013 at 08:57 am
Yes. That is correct. The city has been putting unqualified people into the employees DefinedRead More Pension without following the proper process of placing the requests into the Pension Committee.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?