.
Feedback

Vote Yes on September 18

What's at stake with New London's budget referendum?

On September18, New London voters will get a chance to either approve or reject our municipal budget. 

Previous budgets have gone to referendum so often that it’s almost routine. But this time it’s different.  This year's budget referendum matters more than the 2010 referendum on charter revision, more than last year’s mayoral election.  I believe it’s the most important decision New Londoners will make for generations.

What’s at stake? Solvency, for one. Last year we ran a four million dollar deficit and emptied our fund balance to cover expenses. This year, with no financial reserves, we have to raise enough cover expenses--and we're already falling behind.  Our most recent tax bills went out at last year’s rate, yet our current spending requires a 7.5% tax increase. If we go bankrupt and require a state takeover, investors will back away, we’ll lose our autonomy, and the state could impose a tax increase which would make 7.5% seem like chump change.

Services we take for granted are also at stake. If voters reject the budget, likely cuts include reducing residential trash pickup to once every two weeks; closing the senior center; discontinuing youth and bilingual services, decimating Parks and Recreation; slashing funding for the library and deferring maintenance of our aging municipal vehicles.  We could lose the ability to fix computer crashes outside of normal business hours, potentially affecting public safety.  On top of all this, our bond rating would almost assuredly drop, making it more difficult to tackle larger projects or handle emergencies.

Most of us don’t want cuts to come from these areas. However, there aren’t enough other places to cut to appreciably lower the mill rate. We’ve already consolidated positions, laid people off, reduced salaries, left vacancies open, negotiated union concessions, ended comp time and reduced the number of fire trucks sent out on ambulance calls. We have thirty one fewer employees now than we had last year.

So why is there a tax increase after so many cuts?  Three reasons: loss of state revenue, increased costs for debt service and insurance premiums, and the need to budget more accurately than in the past because we’ve exhausted the fund balance.

After years of flat taxes, there’s no question that a sudden increase will be difficult for many. Household budgets are stretched as tightly as municipal budgets, and some people will vote against any tax increase because they have nothing left to give.  Yet a 0%—or even a 2%—tax increase is literally impossible. We wouldn’t be able to meet our legal obligations.  A 5% increase would gut nearly everything that could be gutted. Even at the current increase, residents will feel the cuts, especially if it’s a snowy winter.

Fortunately there is a light at the end of New London’s financial tunnel. In 2014, several major tax abatements will end, bringing us over three million dollars in annual  revenue.  Other revenue-generating projects are in the works. Provided we pass the budget, our future is looking brighter than it’s looked in years.  It would be heartbreaking to derail it now.

The September 18th budget referendum isn’t about the Mayor, it isn’t about Democrats vs. Republicans, and it isn’t about renters vs. homeowners. It’s about all of us coming together to save our services, our solvency and our city.

We have to pass this budget. Vote Yes on September 18.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!