.
Feedback

I Love a Parade!

Will future permits include the question “Who did you support in the last election?” Or will it just be understood that if you did not support Mayor Finizio, you’re in for a hard time?

 

A fat lot of good loving a parade will do me and the thousands of others who crowd the city every St. Patrick’s Day if Mayor Finizio can’t get by the fact that Election Day is over and it’s past time to stop blaming everything that happens now on who a person supported then.

This blog is not actually about the situation of the St. Patrick’s Day Parade but concerns over what has become standard operating procedure since Mayor Finizio took office in December although using the parade to highlight the problems seems appropriate.

It was estimated that 15,000 spectators  came to New London last year with their family and friends, not to mention their money to spend at local businesses, to view the St. Patrick’s Day Parade and, while the parade committee has said it doesn’t necessarily have a problem with $7500 if it is fair and allows them to maintain their 2012 parade route and treats the parade as a city function as voted on by the city council on February 21, 2012 instead of charging them at the private duty rate for police officers for the day at a much higher rate with a 6 hour minimum, personally I think it’s going a bit too far to ask them to pay rental fees for barricades, garbage cans and a reviewing stand which the city already owns. (http://ci.newlondon.ct.us/filestorage/4159/4161/4171/5744/Council_Minutes_February_21__2012_Approved.pdf)     

There is a lot of time, effort and work that goes into organizing an event of this size, one that brings so much to the city of New London and it seems to me that the parade committee is not asking for a free ride but only for this administration to be fair.

And as if getting a permit for a community event of this magnitude isn’t difficult enough, parade organizers, or rather only one of the parade organizers, Marie Friess-McSparren, is being subjected to one smear after another by the mayor’s short list of cronies, questioning everything from who she supported in the past election, to someone else pulling her strings, “…being consistently on the wrong side of history…”, being uninterested “…in serving both New London and the Parade Committee…

Not to be outdone by his devotees, Mayor Finizio includes The Day columnist, David Collins, in his blame-placing for this permit process fiasco. "The fact that this came so suddenly and without warning, and the fact that it was written by a political columnist, is a clear sign this was a political hit.''

But the real proof of who is guilty of laying blame can be found by doing a simple search on The Day using the search terms “Finizio, blame” and “McSparran, blame” which I did and will show you how far I’ll go to prove a point.  Using those terms, I was actually surprised to come up with anything at all but what I came up with was McSparran, blame 0 and Finizio, blame a whopping 33!

Nick Checker, a local film producer, non-New London resident and Finizio supporter had no problem at all obtaining permission to film portions of his film “Wisp” in a city park.  All he did was ask his friend, Mayor Finizio.  This note, from Nicholas P Checker, appeared on Daryl Finizio’s Facebook page shortly after he was sworn in as mayor. "Nicholas P Checker Sensational day of shooting yesterday for the Kickstart/Preview of our upcoming Nightshade Productions film "Wisp", set for filming this spring. Very special thanks to New London Mayor Daryl Finizio for making Riverside Park fully available to us as a key filming location ... which it will be again this spring."

Like a lot of cities, New London has a Film Commission complete with a fee schedule and permit process yet, after talking with people on the commission and other city officials, I never could find that any fees had been paid or permits issued.

Will future permits include the question “Who did you support in the last election?” Or will it just be understood that if you did not support Mayor Finizio, you’re in for a hard time and will be expected to pay through the nose for everything, including the crosswalks, sidewalks and no walk signs.

Making it difficult for the parade organizers to move ahead with their planning and then denying any part in the resultant chaos is not the first time that the mayor has attempted to attribute one of his public relations disasters anyplace else other than on himself.

Unless Mayor Finizio wakes up to the reality of dwindling support and confidence, not only by the citizens of New London  but by those with whom we do business and the damage this continued enmity and turmoil does to the city, it can only bring more hardship to the people who live and work here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 10:01 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:52 pm
And what I meant by that comment that I don't think this whole thing has anything to do withRead More t-shirt , it's just a shutout to the Mayer and what he is bringing to the table .
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:50 pm
We are young we like change and we like a good laugh that's all the t- shirt is ,
--Robert May 23, 2013 at 03:15 am
Pathetic that anyone would post this as a legit news story, more so that it seems a big corporationRead More is behind these ads.
Jason Morris May 22, 2013 at 01:30 pm
Jessica's previous two posts in other city's patch pages, with the exact same title (just schoolRead More district name changed) have been moderated/deleted. Recommend this corporate advertisement to get the same fate. The concerns are true, but it's an ad nontheless.
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 09:59 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 09:57 am
@Josh: Too much tolerance is also a slippery slope. Like it or not, Zak is a public servant, whichRead More makes him automatically subject to scrutiny of his actions by the public. We can and should speak out when our public servants (elected or graciously appointed in Zak's case) - ESPECIALLLY ones that are supposed to be emissaries to the Capitol - engage in behavior that could cast a bad light on our community. Would you be ok with Obama wearing a shirt that says "America hates you"?
Joshua Pendleton May 22, 2013 at 06:44 pm
Love the shirt or hate it, it is Zacs right to wear what he wants, when he wants to. Democracy isRead More founded on tolerance. This tolerance includes public officials hanging out in their back yard. Intolerance of things of this nature is a slippery slope.
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 03:40 pm
I would say that the Collective Bargaining Agreement would have to be looked at for his Union.Read More Mr. Hathaway is not in Local 1378. He is MEU. I would say, that this is an interesting question for our members. Local 1378's CBA does not go into this language, however it does state that prior to reorganization, the union must be notified to bargain the impacts (not exact language). This is not to say that the union has final say, or say at all as to how the administration shall operate, but the impact to the employees is what matters as well as the position in general. I will look into this language in reference to the Charter and forward it to the MEU as well. Thank you.
Kathleen Mitchell May 22, 2013 at 03:17 pm
The following is from NL's Charter, Sec 46. Does it mean that Bill Hathaway would be entitled to aRead More public hearing? "...Any officer or employee so removed, suspended, laid off or reduced in grade shall, if he so request, be furnished with a written statement of the reason therefor, be allowed a reasonable time for answering such reasons in writing and be given a public hearing by the officer making such removal, suspension, lay-off or reduction in grade, before the order therefor shall be made final..."
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
I have not seen any details other than word of mouth at this time in reference to more being addedRead More to the pension plan after two years. I would not be surprised. This would be another instance in which the charter was violated and would have to be mentioned to the Admin. Committee. I would be willing to gamble that they were put into the employee pension plan as well.
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.