.
Feedback

I Love a Parade!

Will future permits include the question “Who did you support in the last election?” Or will it just be understood that if you did not support Mayor Finizio, you’re in for a hard time?

 

A fat lot of good loving a parade will do me and the thousands of others who crowd the city every St. Patrick’s Day if Mayor Finizio can’t get by the fact that Election Day is over and it’s past time to stop blaming everything that happens now on who a person supported then.

This blog is not actually about the situation of the St. Patrick’s Day Parade but concerns over what has become standard operating procedure since Mayor Finizio took office in December although using the parade to highlight the problems seems appropriate.

It was estimated that 15,000 spectators  came to New London last year with their family and friends, not to mention their money to spend at local businesses, to view the St. Patrick’s Day Parade and, while the parade committee has said it doesn’t necessarily have a problem with $7500 if it is fair and allows them to maintain their 2012 parade route and treats the parade as a city function as voted on by the city council on February 21, 2012 instead of charging them at the private duty rate for police officers for the day at a much higher rate with a 6 hour minimum, personally I think it’s going a bit too far to ask them to pay rental fees for barricades, garbage cans and a reviewing stand which the city already owns. (http://ci.newlondon.ct.us/filestorage/4159/4161/4171/5744/Council_Minutes_February_21__2012_Approved.pdf)     

There is a lot of time, effort and work that goes into organizing an event of this size, one that brings so much to the city of New London and it seems to me that the parade committee is not asking for a free ride but only for this administration to be fair.

And as if getting a permit for a community event of this magnitude isn’t difficult enough, parade organizers, or rather only one of the parade organizers, Marie Friess-McSparren, is being subjected to one smear after another by the mayor’s short list of cronies, questioning everything from who she supported in the past election, to someone else pulling her strings, “…being consistently on the wrong side of history…”, being uninterested “…in serving both New London and the Parade Committee…

Not to be outdone by his devotees, Mayor Finizio includes The Day columnist, David Collins, in his blame-placing for this permit process fiasco. "The fact that this came so suddenly and without warning, and the fact that it was written by a political columnist, is a clear sign this was a political hit.''

But the real proof of who is guilty of laying blame can be found by doing a simple search on The Day using the search terms “Finizio, blame” and “McSparran, blame” which I did and will show you how far I’ll go to prove a point.  Using those terms, I was actually surprised to come up with anything at all but what I came up with was McSparran, blame 0 and Finizio, blame a whopping 33!

Nick Checker, a local film producer, non-New London resident and Finizio supporter had no problem at all obtaining permission to film portions of his film “Wisp” in a city park.  All he did was ask his friend, Mayor Finizio.  This note, from Nicholas P Checker, appeared on Daryl Finizio’s Facebook page shortly after he was sworn in as mayor. "Nicholas P Checker Sensational day of shooting yesterday for the Kickstart/Preview of our upcoming Nightshade Productions film "Wisp", set for filming this spring. Very special thanks to New London Mayor Daryl Finizio for making Riverside Park fully available to us as a key filming location ... which it will be again this spring."

Like a lot of cities, New London has a Film Commission complete with a fee schedule and permit process yet, after talking with people on the commission and other city officials, I never could find that any fees had been paid or permits issued.

Will future permits include the question “Who did you support in the last election?” Or will it just be understood that if you did not support Mayor Finizio, you’re in for a hard time and will be expected to pay through the nose for everything, including the crosswalks, sidewalks and no walk signs.

Making it difficult for the parade organizers to move ahead with their planning and then denying any part in the resultant chaos is not the first time that the mayor has attempted to attribute one of his public relations disasters anyplace else other than on himself.

Unless Mayor Finizio wakes up to the reality of dwindling support and confidence, not only by the citizens of New London  but by those with whom we do business and the damage this continued enmity and turmoil does to the city, it can only bring more hardship to the people who live and work here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?