.
Feedback

Quinnipiac Poll: Connecticut Likes Malloy, But Many Don’t Want Him Back

The latest survey from the university shows Malloy is enjoying his highest approval rating so far, but indicates voters don’t think he deserves a second term.

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s popularity is on the upswing, with 48 percent of voters saying they approve of the job the governor’s doing and 39 percent saying they disapprove, according to a new Quinnipiac University poll released Tuesday, March 12. This is Malloy’s highest approval rating so far, the university pollsters said.

Still, only 42 percent of Connecticut voters think while 45 percent say he does not deserve four more years, the poll shows.

Last week Malloy’s approval rating was split among Connecticut voters, 43–43 percent, university pollsters said. In the latest survey by Quinnipiac, Democrats approve of Malloy 72–15 percent, Republicans disapprove of the governor 69–21 percent and independent voters narrowly approve of him 45–41 percent.  Women approve of Malloy by a wider margin, 51–33 percent, while men are divided 45–46 percent.

However, when it comes to his leadership during times of crisis, voters in Connecticut have a much higher opinion of their governor.

Connecticut voters approve of Malloy’s response to the Newtown shootings 76–17 percent and they liked his handling of the historic February blizzard 80–14 percent.  This comes on top of a 78–16 percent approval rating for Malloy’s handling of Hurricane Sandy last year. 

On gun policy voters approve of his stand on the issue 48–39 percent, the Quinnipiac poll shows. Voters also support stricter gun-control laws in Connecticut, 66–29, with 70–27 percent saying they support a statewide ban on ammunition magazines with more than 10 rounds and 71–26 percent saying they support expanding the statewide ban on the sale of assault weapons.

However, a majority of them, 53-41 percent, don’t think politicians will be able to pass such legislation.

By a 49–27 percent margin, voters trust Democrats more than Republicans on gun policy, but remain divided, 48–47 percent, on whether the governor and lawmakers will be able to get something done to reduce gun violence this year.

“Connecticut voters by wide margins want action on gun-control, but they have less confidence that the state legislature will deliver on this issue,” Douglas Schwartz, director of the Quinnipiac University poll.  “Voters trust Democrats more than Republicans on gun-control and overall they dislike Democrats less than they dislike Republicans.”

Malloy is a strong leader in a crisis, voters say 67–27 percent, but how voters view his handling of other issues is mixed:

  • 57–33 percent disapprove of his handling of the state budget
  • 45–39 percent approve of his handling of education
  • 61–29 percent disapprove of his handling of taxes
  • 56–35 percent disapprove of his handling of the economy

“Connecticut voters say Gov. Dannel Malloy is a good man to have in a crisis and give him very high grades for his response to recent crisis in the state,” Schwartz said “On the day-to-day issues of governing, such as budget, taxes and the economy, he gets failing grades.” 

Democrats in the state legislature also got mixed grades from voters, with 44 percent of voters approving and 46 percent disapproving.  Republicans fared worse, with 32–55 percent approval rating from voters.

On some of the major issues the state is dealing with right now Connecticut voters oppose, by 58–39 percent, putting tolls on highways in the state.  But they told university pollsters, on margin of 57–40  percent, that they would support tolls if the proceeds from them are used to repair the state’s roads and bridges.  And voters would support tolls 53–44 percent if the proceeds are used to reduce the state gas tax.

In other major issues:

  • Voters are divided 44–45 percent on whether they support eliminating the local car tax. 
  • They oppose eliminating the tax 77–18 percent if it leads to higher property taxes.
  • Voters oppose 65–31 percent allowing illegal immigrants to get drivers’ licenses.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 10:01 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:52 pm
And what I meant by that comment that I don't think this whole thing has anything to do withRead More t-shirt , it's just a shutout to the Mayer and what he is bringing to the table .
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:50 pm
We are young we like change and we like a good laugh that's all the t- shirt is ,
--Robert May 23, 2013 at 03:15 am
Pathetic that anyone would post this as a legit news story, more so that it seems a big corporationRead More is behind these ads.
Jason Morris May 22, 2013 at 01:30 pm
Jessica's previous two posts in other city's patch pages, with the exact same title (just schoolRead More district name changed) have been moderated/deleted. Recommend this corporate advertisement to get the same fate. The concerns are true, but it's an ad nontheless.
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 09:59 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 09:57 am
@Josh: Too much tolerance is also a slippery slope. Like it or not, Zak is a public servant, whichRead More makes him automatically subject to scrutiny of his actions by the public. We can and should speak out when our public servants (elected or graciously appointed in Zak's case) - ESPECIALLLY ones that are supposed to be emissaries to the Capitol - engage in behavior that could cast a bad light on our community. Would you be ok with Obama wearing a shirt that says "America hates you"?
Joshua Pendleton May 22, 2013 at 06:44 pm
Love the shirt or hate it, it is Zacs right to wear what he wants, when he wants to. Democracy isRead More founded on tolerance. This tolerance includes public officials hanging out in their back yard. Intolerance of things of this nature is a slippery slope.
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 03:40 pm
I would say that the Collective Bargaining Agreement would have to be looked at for his Union.Read More Mr. Hathaway is not in Local 1378. He is MEU. I would say, that this is an interesting question for our members. Local 1378's CBA does not go into this language, however it does state that prior to reorganization, the union must be notified to bargain the impacts (not exact language). This is not to say that the union has final say, or say at all as to how the administration shall operate, but the impact to the employees is what matters as well as the position in general. I will look into this language in reference to the Charter and forward it to the MEU as well. Thank you.
Kathleen Mitchell May 22, 2013 at 03:17 pm
The following is from NL's Charter, Sec 46. Does it mean that Bill Hathaway would be entitled to aRead More public hearing? "...Any officer or employee so removed, suspended, laid off or reduced in grade shall, if he so request, be furnished with a written statement of the reason therefor, be allowed a reasonable time for answering such reasons in writing and be given a public hearing by the officer making such removal, suspension, lay-off or reduction in grade, before the order therefor shall be made final..."
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
I have not seen any details other than word of mouth at this time in reference to more being addedRead More to the pension plan after two years. I would not be surprised. This would be another instance in which the charter was violated and would have to be mentioned to the Admin. Committee. I would be willing to gamble that they were put into the employee pension plan as well.
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.