.
Feedback

New London Irish Parade Dissolves Its Non-Profit Corporation

Organizers put together five St. Patrick's Day parades before dispute with city administration over permit fees for this year's procession

The nonprofit corporation that has organized three St. Patrick's Day parades in New London has dissolved.

The announcement comes several months after parade organizers announced that they would not be hosting a parade this year due to a dispute with the city administration over permit fees and just days before a parade organized by a new committee is set to kick off.

"The New London Irish Parade wishes to thank all of the volunteers, supporters, participants and well wishers that contributed to making the parade the huge success that it became in so few years," said Marie Friess-McSparran, president of New London Irish Parade Inc., in a press release.

Fries-McSparran said decision to dissolve the 501(c)(3) corporation was made by the parade's executive board. She said the annual parade began with a grassroots effots by Diarmuid Hanafin, Thor Torgerson, and others to hold a St. Patrick's Day procession up State Street in 2007.

The New London Irish Parade gained nonprofit status in 2010, according to an IRS filing posted on the organization's website. Friess-McSparran said the parade grew to become the largest single day event in the city, estimating that over 1,000 marchers and 15,000 spectators attended the 2012 parade.

Last year's parade expanded their route from its former march up Bank Street and State Street, incorporating Huntington Street and Tilley Street into the march to have a loop and lengthier procession. Friess-McSparran said that so many participants had started to take part in the march that the larger staging area in the parking lot of All Souls Unitarian Universalist Congregation was needed, since the former staging area of South Water Street had participants extending over the railroad tracks.

However, the longer route also raised administration concerns about costs incurred by city services to support events. In issuing an executive order saying the city will not issue a permit for special events unless payment is first received for the use of any services, Mayor Daryl Finizio cited police overtime costs at the parade as one motivating factor in the decision.

The order led to a dispute between Finizio and the parade over the costs that would be incurred by the New London Police Department and Department of Public Works during the parade. The parade committee ultimately voted to hold a parade in another community in 2013, and this decision prompted the administration to form a new parade committee to organize a St. Patrick's Day parade for New London.

This committee, headed by organizers Barbara Neff and Sean Murray, has put together the New London St. Patrick's Day Parade, will begin at 1 p.m. on Sunday. The parade will follow a former route of the New London Irish Parade, staging on South Water Street and marcing along Bank Street and State Street before concluding on Washington Street.

Friess-McSparran said the New London Irish Parade committee decided not to hold its own parade in another community so as not to distract from the New London parade.

"The New London Irish Parade Inc. is confident that the team in place will put on a parade that only improves on the solid foundation and prospers while filling New London with marchers and spectators," she said.

Friess-McSparran also said the committee members and volunteers will continue to support and promote Irish culture in New London individually.

"The decision of the executive board of the New London Irish Parade was not an easy one," she said. "The executive board states that the 501(c)(3) corporation was no longer able to commence in the activities for which it was incorporated and as such cannot continue to operate. New London like any community cannot host or support two Irish parades."

According to the parade committee's bylaws, any dissolution of the corporation must be accompanied by a distribution of any assets to public causes. Friess-McSparran said the funds were distributed to other Irish organizations prior to the board's decision to dissolve.

Finizio previously said the New London St. Patrick's Day Parade would be required to pay any necessary fees under his executive order. After another dispute regarding municipal costs associated with an annual Martin Luther King Jr. Day march, Finizio said he plans to include an item in his proposed 2014 fiscal year budget establishing a fund for the City Council to appropriate toward event costs at their discretion.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!