.
Feedback

Just How Red Or Blue Has Connecticut Been In Past Presidential Elections?

Democrats and Republicans have faced off 39 times in presidential elections since 1856 in Connecticut with Republicans winning 23 of them so far.

Connecticut joined the United States in January 1788 and has participated in all 56 presidential elections.

The current main rivalry between Democrats and Republicans has a history that goes back to the election of 1856. Prior to that date, other major national parties included the Federalists, Democratic-Republicans, and the Whigs; however, the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in the spring of 1854 fired up anti-slavery sentiment in the North and led to the birth of the Republican Party and the death of the Whig Party in that same year.


Only 80,325 Connecticut residents — all men — cast votes in the presidential election of 1856. In Connecticut, Republican candidate John C. Fremont beat Democrat James Buchanan — our only bachelor president — 42,715 to 34,995. Know-Nothing candidate and former President Millard Fillmore of Ohio garnered 2,615 votes. Republican candidates for president — including Abe Lincoln twice — won six of the next seven elections in Connecticut. Additionally, in the 60-year period from 1896-1956, Republican candidates won in Connecticut in 12 of the 16 presidential elections.

In the 1912 election nearly 190,000 votes were cast in Connecticut. Democrat and former Middletown resident Woodrow Wilson carried the state despite winning only 39 percent of the vote; Republican William Howard Taft collected 68,324 votes while independent candidate Teddy Roosevelt received 34,129 votes and Socialist Eugene V. Debs got 10,056 votes.

In the 100 years since former Wesleyan University football coach Woodrow Wilson was first elected in 1912, Connecticut voters have accurately picked the president in 18 of 25 presidential elections. Overall, in the 39 elections involving Democrats vs. Republicans since 1856, Connecticut voters have voted for the winner 29 times. Though Connecticut is generally regarded as a "Blue" state, Republicans have actually won 23 of the 39 elections in which Democrats and Republicans have been the headliners.

Another interesting statistic concerning Connecticut residents in 2012 vs. 1912 is the fact that over 200,000 new Connecticut voters have registered since January 1st of this year. That's more than the total of people who voted in Connecticut in the presidential election of 1912! In fact, there are 2,089,311 registered voters in the state this year. That includes 767,693 Democrats, 430,439 Republicans, and an astonishing 872,243 independents! The important role that independents play in Connecticut elections cannot be overstated.

From a larger, regional perspective, an examination of the voting habits of people in the six New England states since 1856 yields interesting results. Every single New England state has a history of voting more for Republican presidential candidates than Democratic presidential candidates in the last 39 elections. 

 Even traditionally Democratic states such as Rhode Island and Massachusetts have voted for Republicans the majority of the time. Both states have voted Republican in 21 of the last 39 elections. Ironically, the most reliably Republican New England state from an historical perspective — Vermont — is arguably the bluest of all the blue states in recent elections! In fact, Vermont has elected a Socialist candidate to the Senate in recent years. Vermont has voted Republican in 33 of the last 39 presidential elections.

Speaking of Vermont, one of that state's most venerable senators, George Aiken, would be appalled at the cost of running both for senator and for president. By the end of this year's campaign, Linda McMahon of Connecticut will have spent close to $100,000,000 in two senatorial campaigns. Recent estimates place the cost of running for the presidency this year at close to a billion dollars for each candidate. In Aiken's last campaign for the Senate in 1968, the beloved senator spent a total of $17.09 in his successful re-election bid — well under a penny per every vote cast!

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 10:01 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:52 pm
And what I meant by that comment that I don't think this whole thing has anything to do withRead More t-shirt , it's just a shutout to the Mayer and what he is bringing to the table .
Mario de Lucia May 22, 2013 at 07:50 pm
We are young we like change and we like a good laugh that's all the t- shirt is ,
--Robert May 23, 2013 at 03:15 am
Pathetic that anyone would post this as a legit news story, more so that it seems a big corporationRead More is behind these ads.
Jason Morris May 22, 2013 at 01:30 pm
Jessica's previous two posts in other city's patch pages, with the exact same title (just schoolRead More district name changed) have been moderated/deleted. Recommend this corporate advertisement to get the same fate. The concerns are true, but it's an ad nontheless.
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 09:59 am
Bottom line - A dumb decision by a public servant. If he was going to wear a shirt whose humor wasRead More so eccentric that it needed wide explanation, he should have avoided the urge to take a picture AND post it on Facebook! DUMB!
The Truth Hurts May 23, 2013 at 09:57 am
@Josh: Too much tolerance is also a slippery slope. Like it or not, Zak is a public servant, whichRead More makes him automatically subject to scrutiny of his actions by the public. We can and should speak out when our public servants (elected or graciously appointed in Zak's case) - ESPECIALLLY ones that are supposed to be emissaries to the Capitol - engage in behavior that could cast a bad light on our community. Would you be ok with Obama wearing a shirt that says "America hates you"?
Joshua Pendleton May 22, 2013 at 06:44 pm
Love the shirt or hate it, it is Zacs right to wear what he wants, when he wants to. Democracy isRead More founded on tolerance. This tolerance includes public officials hanging out in their back yard. Intolerance of things of this nature is a slippery slope.
Felicia Hendersen May 21, 2013 at 07:52 am
OMG this is too funny. Nice comparison.
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 03:40 pm
I would say that the Collective Bargaining Agreement would have to be looked at for his Union.Read More Mr. Hathaway is not in Local 1378. He is MEU. I would say, that this is an interesting question for our members. Local 1378's CBA does not go into this language, however it does state that prior to reorganization, the union must be notified to bargain the impacts (not exact language). This is not to say that the union has final say, or say at all as to how the administration shall operate, but the impact to the employees is what matters as well as the position in general. I will look into this language in reference to the Charter and forward it to the MEU as well. Thank you.
Kathleen Mitchell May 22, 2013 at 03:17 pm
The following is from NL's Charter, Sec 46. Does it mean that Bill Hathaway would be entitled to aRead More public hearing? "...Any officer or employee so removed, suspended, laid off or reduced in grade shall, if he so request, be furnished with a written statement of the reason therefor, be allowed a reasonable time for answering such reasons in writing and be given a public hearing by the officer making such removal, suspension, lay-off or reduction in grade, before the order therefor shall be made final..."
Richard Waselik May 22, 2013 at 10:37 am
I have not seen any details other than word of mouth at this time in reference to more being addedRead More to the pension plan after two years. I would not be surprised. This would be another instance in which the charter was violated and would have to be mentioned to the Admin. Committee. I would be willing to gamble that they were put into the employee pension plan as well.
Alphonse DeLachance May 21, 2013 at 08:30 am
I cannot believe that they lied! Who could have seen this coming.