.
Feedback

Health Study: Connecticut Asthma Rates on the Rise

In New London, 2,359 people suffering from asthma visited a hospital emergency department between 2005 and 2009, the report states.

Asthma rates have risen nearly 18 percent in Connecticut between 2000 and 2010 and the disease disproportionately affects women, children and minorities, the most recent state survey of the disease shows.

The Department of Public Health’s “The Burden of Asthma in Connecticut – 2012 Surveillance Report,” also shows that in 2010, the most recent year for which data was available, approximately 89,300, or 11.3 percent, of all Connecticut children had asthma. The survey additionally shows that 246,100 adults in Connecticut, or 9.2 percent, suffer from the disease.

Between 2000 and 2010, the asthma rates among adults in Connecticut adults increased 17.9 percent. From 2005 to 2010, the, the rate of asthma among Connecticut children increased 7.6 percent, the report states. And the disease, the study found, afflicts women, children and minorities more than other populations. 

In New London, there were 2,359 reported emergency room visits by asthma sufferers between 2005 and 2009, the report says. That translates into an age-adjusted rate of 193 per every 10,000 people.

“Children, females, Hispanics, non-Hispanic Blacks, and residents of Bridgeport, Hartford, New Haven, Waterbury, and Stamford are disproportionately affected by asthma in Connecticut.”

The increased rates of asthma has led to a corresponding hike in emergency room visits by those who suffer from the disease, the report states.

“Among Connecticut residents from 2005 – 2009, adult asthma hospitalization rates were highest for females, persons aged 65 years and older, and Hispanics. For the same time period, child asthma hospitalization rates were highest for boys, children under five years old, and non-Hispanic Blacks. In 2009, the overall asthma hospitalization rate was highest for persons who lived in New Haven. With regard to asthma ED visits from 2005 – 2009, adult asthma ED visit rates were highest for: females, 18 -24 year olds, 25-34 year olds, and Hispanics. During the same five-year period, child asthma ED visits rates were highest for boys, children under five years old, and Hispanics. The 50.9 percent increase in asthma ED visits among Hispanic children from 2005 to 2009 is of particular concern. In 2009, the asthma ED visit rate was highest for people who lived in Hartford.”

The report goes on to say that the health department’s Asthma Control Program is working on initiatives that would reduce inequities in health care access for asthma sufferers and is disseminating information to local communities to help reduce the incidence of the disease.

Here are several “fast facts” from the asthma survey:

♦ There were 50 asthma deaths in 2009

♦ 54% of people with asthma limited their usual activities because of asthma

♦ 66% of people with asthma had asthma that was not well or very poorly controlled

♦ 10.2% of adults with asthma smoked

♦ 22.3% of children with asthma lived in a household with at least one adult who smoked

♦ 19.6% of obese children also had asthma

♦ 40.1% of people with asthma did not have a routine checkup during the past year

♦ 65.7% of people with asthma have never been given an Asthma Action Plan

♦ From 2000 to 2009, non-Hispanic Black children had the highest annual rates of asthma hospitalizations across all other child and adult race/ethnicity groups.

♦ Hispanic adults had 5.2 times the rate of asthma hospitalizations as non-Hispanic White adults from 2005 to 2009.

♦ From 2000 to 2009, Hispanic children had the highest asthma ED visit rates of all race/ethnicity subgroups. Non-Hispanic Black children experienced the second highest asthma ED visit rates for that time period.

♦ Between 2005 and 2009, the asthma ED visit rate for Hispanic children increased 50.9%.

♦ New Haven residents had the highest asthma hospitalization rate in the state in 2009.

♦ The rate of asthma ED visits was highest in 2009 for Hartford residents.

♦ Public insurance was the payment source for 73.8% of asthma hospitalizations and 60% of asthma ED visits in 2009.

♦ Of the 2,741 children enrolled in HUSKY A who had asthma ED visits in 2007, only 24.4%

received follow-up care within two weeks of their ED visits in accordance with national treatment guidelines.

♦ Approximately 11.3% of HUSKY A enrollees less than age 21 had asthma in 2007

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?