.
Feedback

Murphy, Bysiewicz Give Assurances On Connecticut Defense Economy

Democratic candidates for Senate oppose BRAC, support faster withdrawal from Afghanistan

Both Susan Bysiewicz and Rep. Chris Murphy said Monday that they would support cuts to defense spending to help reduce the nation’s deficit, but that Connecticut defense industries would not be affected by such a move.

At a debate at the , the Democratic candidates for Senate fielded questions related to the role of military spending in the economy. Each said they felt defense cuts would be necessary to balance the budget.

Bysiewicz said the Government Accountability Office recently found $1.2 billion in duplicate defense funds that could be eliminated. She said the country should also work toward realigning its military to better address new threats.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

“We have a military right now that has an infrastructure that was put into place during the Cold War and after World War II,” said Bysiewicz.

Bysiewicz said such a move would not target Sub Base New London, but rather aim to close U.S. bases in Europe which she said serve no purpose after the Cold War.

“I think we need fewer troops and bases overseas,” she said. “We need stronger air and naval power, and both of those things would benefit Connecticut because of the very strong defense industry which we have right here.”

Murphy said these industries, namely the Groton-based nuclear submarine manufacturer and the jet-engine program at Pratt & Whitney in East Hartford, are “absolutely critical to our defense as a nation.” He said submarines are still vital to defense against new threats in the Pacific.

“We are poised here in southeastern Connecticut to be a leader,” said Murphy. “People don’t know this, but it actually takes less time for a sub to get to the Southeast Asian theater from Groton than it does from San Diego.”

Both Bysiewicz and Murphy opposed the creation of a new Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission. Murphy said the government has not yet completed its last BRAC and that this commission overran its anticipated expenditures.

Murphy also said he would support investment in stronger “Buy America” laws, which he felt would reduce federal spending while creating up to 600,000 jobs. Bysiewicz said she also supported the idea, but said the United States is still losing jobs to oversea competitors and that Congress has failed to close loopholes related to these laws.

Each candidate also said they would like to see U.S. troops withdrawn from Afghanistan sooner than the end of 2014, as proposed by President Barack Obama. Murphy says he has visited Afghanistan three times during his time in Congress.

“I’ve seen the growing reality that we are doing more harm than good to this nation’s security by continuing to be there,” he said.

Bysiewicz said the war has placed an immense burden on veterans, citing a statistic declaring that between 2001 and 2010 more than 1,000 California soldiers returning from Afghanistan have committed suicide.

“For every month that we [speed up the withdrawal] we save 50 American lives and we save $10 billion that we could be investing in our own American future,” said Bysiewicz.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 06:02 am
The general public would not be supporting anyone. This is funded by those that contribute. I amRead More glad you and your wife are able to retire off of social security and what ever savings you were able to put together. But, unfortanately, there will probably not be enough when others are eligible to retire, even though every paycheck we have put in without being asked. Now, some other solution needs to be developed. This is one.
Zak Leavy May 18, 2013 at 10:45 am
Rich, Great blog and I couldn't agree more. American workers have a right to retire with dignityRead More and SB 54 takes another step to make that a reality. This bill is a common sense solution to the problem that many workers face as they near retirement. Considering the analysis of the bill shows only an extremely low, one-time, cost then hopefully that will be enough to have both chambers pass it.
Doc Halliday May 18, 2013 at 08:58 am
It is NOT up to the general public to support anyone in retIrement. It IS the responsibility ofRead More each individual to provide some savings for their retirement. We have to learn to NOT buy what we want but to buy responsibly what we need. My wife and I live on social security and very small savings. We have yard sales and sell off some of our "stuff" when we need cash. WE have always lived responsibly and had a good life.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!