.
Feedback

Does Husbands "R" Us Give Refunds? - Where's the Ketchup

A humorous blog about the curious things that husbands do and the "joys" of being married, from a wife's perspective.

 

If I had a dime for every time my husband asked me where something was—when it was right there in plain sight—I’d be out cruising around in my Lamborghini instead of writing this blog.

Without fail, Tim constantly asks me where this is, where that is, and also where 67 other things are, on a daily basis. To give you a feel for what I’m talking about, here’s an example—which by the way happens frequently. He’ll pad out to the kitchen, open the refrigerator door and then stand there, staring into it with a dumbfounded look on his face, asking me where the ketchup is. I tell him it’s in the refrigerator. He’ll then inform me that it is most definitely not in there—as he continues to stare catatonically into its cold depth

“Have you actually looked?” I’ll ask.

“OF COURSE I’VE LOOKED; IT’S NOT IN THERE!!!” He’ll vehemently hiss, as if I’ve either done something devious with it, or I’ve just asked the stupidest question on earth.

I sigh and tell him to step aside so I can find it for him, to which he‘ll re-iterate
arrogantly that it is most certainly not in there.

Mmhmmm…

“Found it,” I’ll say, handing it to him .003 seconds later, since it was, of course, front and center on the top shelf, practically flashing a neon ketchup sign.

“IT WASN’T THERE!” He’ll wail, and then proceed to further tell me how I hid it somewhere else—on purpose—and  evidently by some form of pure evil magic produced it out of nowhere to make him look stupid.

Ummmm….

You see, we both have a very different definition of the word “looking.” Call me crazy but for me it means what you might think it means. For Tim, it means go somewhere near to the location where the object might be, do nothing, and then wait for the object to miraculously appear and leap willingly into his grasp; anything short of that means it isn’t there.

This doesn’t just happen with condiments either; it’s a commonplace scenario at our house involving anything he might go on a quest for.  He could be standing in front of his sock drawer looking for socks, his workbench searching for a certain tool, or a wide open field looking for a tractor; it doesn’t matter where it is—or what it is—because if he’s “looked” and can’t find it, then it ISN’T THERE. And, of course, that would be my cue to aid and assist; after many years of marriage I know it well. But you see I don’t mind, as it’s actually fun to see the look on his face when I can easily come across whatever it was that supposedly wasn’t there.

By the way, did I mention to you about the time he couldn’t find his hat? It was on his head…

:)



Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?