.
Feedback

Arts Council Falters In Committee

Proposed regional cultural collaborative tabled due to commitment concerns

A proposal to support the formation of a regional arts council was tabled by the Finance Committee on Monday due to concerns over a lack of input from New London cultural institutions and similar organizations in nearby towns.

The committee voted 3-2 to table the matter pending feedback from several southeastern Connecticut towns that are not currently represented by a regional cultural collaborative. A motion by the committee’s chairman, Rob Pero, to support the arts council by offering $1,000, seeking $3,000 from the Northeastern Council of Governments, and asking regional towns to also contribute $1,000 initially passed 3-2. However, it was overturned when Mayor Martin Olsen asked to reconsider his vote.

The meeting followed a 1 p.m. gathering at , which was called following a recent City Council decision to begin discussions with the Connecticut Commission on Culture and Tourism regarding the possible formation of a regional arts council. John Cusano, community development coordinator with the state commission, said such arts councils act as a sort of extension of the commission to promote the attractions of an area and streamline the operations of individual organizations.

Cusano said the councils include a wide variety of creative cultural locales, are engaged in cultural decisions and policymaking, and do not compete with one another. They may also participate in the Local Arts Agency Cultural Leadership Program, a grant-funded initiative to coordinate relationships between local groups and the commission and strengthen relationships between groups.

Cusano said the arts council could apply for a $6,000 grant, which would have to be matched in full. A second phase grant would allow for $5,000, which would also have to be matched.

Cusano said there are no cultural networks currently in place in southeastern Connecticut.

“Given the amount of activity that comes out of this little place called New London, it’s amazing that there’s no organization to even help coordinate,” said Cusano.

Ryan Odinak, executive director of the Cultural Alliance of Fairfield County, said at the Hygienic meeting that over 200 cultural organizations are included in the group. Its activities include FCBuzz.org, a website about things to do in the Fairfield County region; a radio partnership; bundled marketing initiatives to get lower rates; and professional development workshops.

“You’re actually participating in the success of the organization,” she said.

Cusano said he would recommend an assessment of cultural institutes in the New London region, ranging from choral groups to museums, as well as coordination with other groups. He said a regional collaborative would help to energize the area and promote it to residents and visitors.

Vincent Scarano, president of Hygienic Art, said the gallery is already acting as a “de facto” collaborative by bringing together various types of artists from New London and the region to display or perform at the Bank Street location.

“It’s truly a grassroots movement, because if it wasn’t for the artists and the community this place wouldn’t exist,” said Scarano.

Tony Sheridan, president of the Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut, said a thriving cultural scene is essential for community development.

“Don’t make any mistake about it: this is economic development in the truest sense of the word,” he said.

The Hygienic meeting included dozens of people attending from places such as the , , , the , the , the , and the Eugene O’Neill Theater in Waterford. However, none of the attendees at that meeting attended the finance committee meeting aside from New London resident Joseph Celli.

“It seemed to be that the leadership of the major cultural institutions in town thought this was a really good idea,” said Celli.

Councilor Michael Buscetto III said he was reluctant to support Pero’s motion since he was unable to attend the Hygienic meeting and had not heard from any representatives of the cultural institutions in New London or other towns in the region.

“Before you put money up for a regional effort, I think you should get the regional support,” said Buscetto.

Pero said the City Council had previously approved discussions on an arts council, and that the item would have to go before the full City Council for further discussion before it could be put in place. Councilor Adam Sprecace said Pero’s motion would not commit $1,000 to the arts council right away, but was meant as a gesture to show that the city would be willing to contribute toward matching the grant.

“We can’t spend this money without getting the other $5,000,” said Sprecace.

Buscetto said he supported the idea of the arts council, but felt the matter should have gone to the committee before the community meeting at Hygienic Art was held.

“I think all of the towns should have been invited, and if they had shown up that would have been a sign of commitment,” he said.

Following Olsen’s request to reconsider the approval of Pero’s motion, Olsen asked to table the question. He was joined by Buscetto and Councilor Wade Hyslop, Jr. in the 3-2 vote supporting his motion, and opposed by Pero and Sprecace.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?