.
Feedback

House For Sale, Asking Price One Dollar*

*Moving and restoration costs not included; contact New London Landmarks for more information

Even in a buyer’s market, this is quite a bargain: a historic home on Ocean Ave. is going for one dollar.

Of course, you can’t expect to move in as soon as the check clears. The buyer will also be responsible for relocating the structure as well as any refurbishments.

The one-and-a-half story house, located at 94 Ocean Ave., is owned by Constandinos Provatos. He has given notice of his intent to demolish the house in order to establish additional parking for the Ocean Pizza Restaurant and Seafood House, which Provatos also owns.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Sandra Chalk, executive director of New London Landmarks, said the organization as well as the Historic District Commission are hoping to find someone to purchase the house before Oct. 8, when a hold order on the demolition expires.

“It’s a wonderful example of a small Greek Revival house of its era,” said Chalk.

The house’s history

According to New London Landmarks, the house was built around 1828. It measures about 20 feet by 43 feet and is clapboard with a brick chimney and granite foundation.

The organization has determined that the house was likely built as an investment by Isaac Thompson, a merchant who helped establish businesses such as the Savings Bank of New London, Union Insurance Company, New London Female Academy, and a ferry company. Daniel Penhallow, a stonemason, was a tenant in the house and purchased it around 1846.

New London Landmarks says the house has historic significance due to its association with a prominent citizen as well as a resident who took part in construction that flourished in New London during the prosperity of the city’s whaling years. It cites architectural significance as well in the Greek Revival features such as corner pilasters and eyebrow windows.

Chalk said the house will likely need a “fairly complete renovation.” The windows are currently boarded up, and a sign on the front door warns that it contains asbestos.

Demolition procedures and relocations

Under New London’s demolition ordinance, requests for demolition must be brought before New London Landmarks, the New London County Historical Society, and the appointed members of the Historic District Commission. If a location is in the downtown historic district, New London Main Street and the City Center District must also be notified.

Chalk said the organizations are not able to stop a demolition, but may request a 90-day stay on the action. She said work during this period can include seeking someone to purchase and move a structure or asking the property owner to retain the building. Chalk said the commission and organizations aim to be reasonable in their use of this delay.

“We do not carry the flag and fight every demolition that comes our way,” she said.

Chalk said relocations of buildings were more common before the use of above-ground utility lines. She said it has also become more difficult to find people to invest in preserving such buildings due to the conditions of the structures as well as the costs of moving and land on which to establish the building.

The Historic District Commission has overseen successful relocations before. The Planned Parenthood building on Franklin Street was the carriage house of the original courthouse on Huntington Street and was moved from that location. A frame Pequot Colony house was also moved to Robinson Street.

Chalk said she also hopes to address the City Council on the demolition ordinance’s time limit, saying the state has extended their own limit to 120 days since the ordinance was passed.

“Seeing a house torn down is heartbreaking, and if we’d had a little more time maybe we could have done something,” she said.

Anyone interested in the property may contact New London Landmarks at 860-442-0003 or info@newlondonlandmarks.org.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.