.
Feedback

eBay Tuesday: Thomas Shaw's Connecticut State Interest Note

Prominent New London resident gets interest payment for contributions to Revolutionary War

This week's item is a small piece of paper for a small amount of money signifying a huge connection to New London's history in the Revolutionary War.

Offered by user keny56, the Connecticut state interest note was issued to Thomas Shaw on Feb. 1, 1790. Like modern day form documents, much of the note has been pre-printed, in this case by Hudson and Goodwin of Hartford. Certified by Connecticut state comptroller Ralph Pomeroy, it reads:

"I hereby certify that Thomas Shaw is entitled to receive the Sum of FIVE SHILLINGS Lawful Money, out of any Funds appropriated for the Payment of interest on the liquidated Debt of the State of Connecticut."

Thomas Shaw is a lesser-known member of New London's famed Shaw family. He was the son of Capt. Nathaniel Shaw and his brother, Nathaniel Shaw Jr., was especially active during the war. Following the authorization of privateering by the Continental Congress in 1776, Nathaniel Jr. was responsible for the outfitting of many of these vessels during New London's active service as a privateering port.

When Benedict Arnold attacked the city in 1781, the Shaw Mansion where Nathaniel and Thomas lived was one of the targets. Fortunately, the blaze was extinguished by a neighbor and the house continued to serve the Shaw family for five generations before it became the home of the New London County Historical Society in 1907. Upon Nathaniel's death in a hunting accident later in 1781, Thomas took over the family's business interests.

The interest note came to him as part of the newly formed United States' attempts to pay off its war debts following the victory in the Revolutionary War. The Connecticut comptroller's office was formed in 1786 to oversee public accounts, including the state's attempts to consolidate and pay off its debts from the war.

The large burden on individuals and states eventually led Congress to pass the Funding Act of 1790 on Aug. 4 of that year. A total of $21.5 million in state debts - including $1.6 million in Connecticut - were absorbed by the federal government. Spearheaded by Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton, the act allowed investors to buy interest-bearing government bonds as a way of consolidating the debt, making it easier to pay interest payment, and allowing investors to make a tidy profit on the bonds.

In addition to the business pursuits, Shaw was a well-known Congregationalist who made a hefty contribution toward the former Zion's Hill meeting house in 1786 and donated a parsonage to the congregation in 1787. He remained a bachelor, living with his mother in the Shaw Mansion, and died in 1795 at the age of 57.

The note has been certified by Currency Grading & Authentication Inc. Initially offered for 99 cents, three bids have been made on the note and the price is now up to $26, plus $2 for shipping and handling. The auction ends at about 8:48 p.m. tonight.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Doc Halliday May 19, 2013 at 08:23 am
Should the general public be required to support the retirement of our elected/hired governmentRead More officials? Should those retirement checks be based on base salary and not base salary plus overtime/extra pay/bonuses etc? Should ALL government officials be on a 401 system instead of a government (public supported) retirement system? ie: government official retires at 95% pay, in a few years with cost of living increases that official is making more in retirement than when working. The public cannot afford to continue such high retirements. Social Security is being tapped by government officials to pay OTHER items rather than for what it was intended and future retirees who contributed to SS may be left out.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?
Carol Haley May 15, 2013 at 05:05 pm
Sounds like a bunch of goobledygook to me. And Sue, the Democrats being divided isn't anything newRead More as well as the backstabbing and bs. It's been going on for years. That is one of the reasons I changed to independent a long time ago. I'm presently a Democrat, but changing back to independent as soon as I can get down there.
Felicia Hendersen May 15, 2013 at 09:00 am
Bravo Sue P. And Kathleen I changed the word from "her" to "his". Why shouldRead More people not question the motives of the city council president?
Sue P. May 15, 2013 at 08:53 am
Glad to here that Felicia, I sure hope that you are who you are and not the HE I was told you are.Read More Now is the time to work together and not pick each other apart like the Administration is doing to the Democrat Town Committee.You should see how divided they are and all the back stabbing and bickering that goes on. I say stay clear of that group.
William Desmond May 14, 2013 at 12:47 pm
I must say this has created quite a stir!
Luis Smart May 14, 2013 at 07:04 am
I agree Richard argyle sweaters would have really made it. It is really sad Michael Passero has goneRead More to the dark side and has aligned himself with the administration rather than the people of the city. The one time high vote getter will be all done in November.
Richard Cranium May 13, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I think it is pretty funny although they should be wearing argyle vest sweaters!