.
Feedback

eBay Tuesday: Sheffield Dentifrice Advertisement

1909 advertisement is for New London company, still in existence, which invented the modern form of toothpaste

"Welcome to New London: Birthplace of Toothpaste." Perhaps it's not the most tourism-driving slogan you can put on a sign, but you could certainly do a lot worse.

The original advertisement featured in this week's auction item is from the company that makes that claim. Offered by user okie-cowboy-2003, the 1909 ad is for "Doctor Sheffield's Creme Dentifrice," a product of the Sheffield Dentifrice Co. in New London. It touts the compression key to squeeze the tube and save the strain on your fingers, along with the fresh flavor and dental health benefits.

"The children use it without urging," the advertisement reads in part. "This fragrant antiseptic creme makes the mouth fresh, sweet, and antiseptically clean for hours after each brushing."

If the company name sounds familiar, it's because it's is still around today at the same location and still in the same trade. Sheffield Pharmaceuticals continues to manufacture toothpaste along with products such as creams and ointments.

It seems the Colgate company is usually credited for the invention of the kind of toothpaste we use today. Originally a soap producer, the company has laid claim to inventing the first modern toothpaste with Colgate Dental Cream, first sold in jars in 1873. Colgate also says in its official timeline that it introduced toothpaste in a collapsible tube in 1896.

Sheffield beats these claims by years in each case. And while Colgate at least acknowledges on its history of dental hygiene products that Creme Dentifice predates its own product, it never mentions the Sheffield name and or the fact that its introduction of toothpaste tubes was developing on a New London innovation.

Products for cleaning teeth have been a slowly evolving industry, starting with powdery mixtures of ingredients such as ash, sand, honey, or herbs. This kind of toothpaste dates back at least to the days of ancient Egypt, but the use of tooth powders continued well into the 19th century.

The Sheffield Pharmaceuticals official history proudly displays a picture of Dr. Washington Wentworth Sheffield beneath the caption "Inventor of Toothpaste." This account says Sheffield was a dental surgeon and chemist who in 1850, at the age of 23, invented the first modern toothpaste from his Broad Street laboratory. The popularity of the toothpaste led to the expansion of the laboratory as well as the development of complementary products.

The New London company also says it had the idea to transfer toothpaste from jars to the more convenient tubes, with this development coming about after Sheffield's son - Dr. Lucius Tracy Sheffield - noted the use of metal tubes for paints and inks while he was studying in France. Accounts put the year for this change at 1892 - four years before Colgate started the practice.

The advertisement is three inches by four and a quarter inches, described as being in excellent condition with little or no fading from age. The asking price is $10.99 and shipping is free. The auction ends at about 6 p.m. today.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?