.
Feedback

eBay Tuesday: New London County Bar Association 1881 Resolution

First recorded president of association delivers a memorial address for the Honorable Lafayette S. Foster

The current website of the New London County Bar Association is a fairly no-frills affair. It gives a directory of lawyers in the organization, directions to the courthouses in the area, advice on how jurors should dress and conduct themselves, and a few other odds and ends. The only nod it gives to the history of the association is a sporadic list of past presidents, which happens to include a person mentioned in this week's selected eBay item.

This eight-page pamphlet dates back to 1881 and details resolutions adopted by the New London County Bar Association. Particular mention is given to an address given by John Turner Wait in memory of the Honorable Lafayette S. Foster. Wait is the first president recorded by the association, serving from 1874 to about 1895 (the latter date is appended with a question mark). The association's records get more sporadic after that, recording only the non-consecutive terms of the same person before adding year-to-year presidents from 1955 to 2009.

Foster had a rich life of public service, studying law in Norwich but joining the bar in Maryland after taking over an academy there. He returned to Norwich, served in the Connecticut house of representatives, made a few unsuccessful bids for governor, served as mayor of Norwich, and finally served in the United States Senate from 1855 to 1867, including a term as president pro tempore and acting Vice President following President Abraham Lincoln's assassination. After a brief period as a Yale University professor, he was appointed associate justice of the Connecticut Supreme Court and served until 1876. He died on Sept. 19, 1880 at the age of 73.

The Senate service carried Foster right through the Civil War. According to another memorial, he reluctantly recognized that slavery was recognized in the Constitution and protected by certain guarantees, but made no secret that he hated the system. "To found a government on a principle so clearly violative of human right, so offensive to God, must sooner or later call down His curse," he once said in opposition to expanding slavery beyond its constitutional limits. "It is surely better that we refuse to incorporate this demand into our organic law, even in view of the most terrible alternative which can be presented. None can be so terrible as the wrath of God, which would surely visit us if we consented to this enormity."

Foster's memory also lives on at the Connecticut Judicial Branch Law Libraries and Connecticut State Library. The judicial website described him as "a man of persistence and strong religioius convictions" who upon his death donated his library to Norwich and his home to the Norwich Free Academy. "He was no seeker after popularity, certainly he never descended to any truckling arts to secure it, and probably to some extent he lost favor by the high tone of both his character and bearing, and by the selectness of his friendships," the Connecticut State Library's colorful obituary reads in part. "He was a man of the most absolute integrity."

The library also includes the text of Wait's address, which he gave upon the admission of several other resolutions on Foster's character presented to the bar association and Connecticut Supreme Court. Wait said he worked for a time as a student in Foster's law firm and had quite a few compliments to bestow upon him. "I will close my imperfect remarks by saying that my brothers of the bar unite with me in the desire to bear public testimony to the worth and virtues of the Hon. LaFayette S. Foster, and that the resolutions which have been presented to the court are the heartfelt expression of their regard and affection for the lamented dead," he concluded.

Wait was a notable figure in his own regard. Born in New London in 1811, he commenced practice in Norwich and served in both the Connecticut General Assembly and five terms in the U.S. House of Representatives. When Wait died in 1899 at the age of 87, he earned praise on the level of his former mentor. "In all these various positions he was an honest, capable, faithful, and conscientious public servant, and one of the foremost citizens of the town," one resolution adopted by the bar association read in part.

The pamphlet is offered by seller tholc13krab, who says it is in good condition aside from a central crease and some soiling on the edges. The starting bid is $9.95, and another $2.95 is needed to ship it from Maine. The auction ends at about 2:55 p.m. on Thursday.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New London Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Sue P. May 20, 2013 at 11:03 am
Very good comparison. I also wanted to add that the Ct. College students that believe what FinizioRead More has to say remind me of The Children of the Corn. After speaking with a friend we realized that Mayor Finizio is like a college student. I just wish he knew that real life does not work this way. New London has already played this game with the Giordano lady years ago. Remember her she was from Ct. College and also was going to make New London a hip city. We got homeless people and brownfields. So much for that idea. Been their done that. How about a new idea for once. Please don't think about shutting down State St. that too was a bad idea. Just ask Mr. Hyslop and Ms. Glover how their ideas worked out. It doesn't matter anyways it's all about the votes and getting your Children of the Corn on the Council. I mean come on drivers licenses for illigals who ever thought that one up.
J. Scagnetti May 20, 2013 at 10:07 am
I'd say more like G.I. Joe vs cobra, oh no wait, He man vs skeletor or maybe even the thundercats vsRead More mumra! Lol
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 07:14 pm
Here's the latest Spencer from the AP, if we can believe them: Traffic in southwest ConnecticutRead More could be a mess for as much as a week until service is restored to the commuter rail line affected by a derailment that injured scores of passengers, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy warned Sunday.
Spencer May 19, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Another blow to not only NL's but the entire Southern CT's economy! Guess who will be picking upRead More the tab?
Carol Haley May 19, 2013 at 05:26 pm
I read that Malloy is hoping Monday but there are problems with the tracks and that has to beRead More repaired. Taking a guestimate, if it isn't Monday, maybe the end of the week.
John Martin May 19, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Of course, you are assuming that the government fund managers would be responsible. So far, this hasRead More been far from the case. The Federal government has plundered Social Security for decades, the teacher and state employee funds have been systematically looted. Of course they want to open this up to anyone with dollars in their pockets. I am not opposed to a program like this - in fact, economies of scale using voluntary contributions in a well-managed plan could be quite beneficial. If the government is going to be allowed to administer the program, there needs to be stringent safeguards, the funds must be untouchable, and there should be swift and significant consequences for mismanagement. Oh, but wait - this is Connecticut. Of course people will find their dollars funding the 'progressive' agenda with no regard for the state's fiduciary, legal, and moral obligation to the contributors.
Kathleen Mitchell May 19, 2013 at 10:45 am
If I read this correctly and, if not, I'm sure someone will correct me, the highlights of this billRead More are (1) It's designed for workers "who do not have access to a retirement plan through their employer" (2) "workers can take their investment with them as they move from job to job." (3) "whatever administrative costs are associated with the plan are charged to the participants themselves, not Connecticut taxpayers." I haven't read the bill yet but I don't see anything in this article by Richard Waselik regarding an employer contribution or match so what is the problem?
Sue P. May 19, 2013 at 10:20 am
Richard, Are you the same Richard that sent a letter to the city council when you became concernedRead More that people that did not work for the city long enough were contributing to the pension plan? I think I have a copy of it somewhere. I think you were concerned that people were getting vested and they were not suppose to be yet.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 07:44 am
Pretty funny Spencer. But you don't want a museum there. You need something that generates taxes.Read More Museums are mostly non-profit thereby not generating any taxes. I know you were being funny. I was disgusted to read the developer couldn't show financial backing.
Kathleen Mitchell May 17, 2013 at 05:47 pm
Who would haveever thought of Wasp Spray? When you get the case of spray, be sure and drop a can offRead More at my house;>)
Jeff Brown May 17, 2013 at 03:46 pm
Good article, gonna have to pick up a case of wasp spray!
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Barbara, I agree with you. But it is probably a lot easier to get an illegal social security numberRead More than we would know. There are two ways of looking at this issue, but my resentment is that I have to pay for them.
Barbara Crocker May 17, 2013 at 07:52 am
But for state aid they would have to have a Social Security number. Bending and breaking laws isRead More how they got here in the first place. The fact that elected officials condone and encourage these laws to be broken is the biggest problem that I have with this whole debacle. "Undocumented residents" place a burden on all of us, and take jobs that could be worked by legal residents. Employers hire illegals (yes I prefer calling them what they are, to hell with being politically correct) because it saves them money, not because "no one else would work these jobs". This is a slap in the face to all of our ancestors who came to this country and followed the rules to become citizens.
Carol Haley May 17, 2013 at 06:51 am
The way things have been going in the eastern part of the United States, as long as the illegals areRead More not breaking the law criminally (motor vehicle is different), they are not arrested for being illegal. Its the illegal immigrants who break the law, such as the large drug bust recently in the papers. As long as they are minding their own business, they get a pass. The only problem I have with illegals is their rush to get on state aid, food stamps, etc. I don't think we should have to support those that choose to live in this country illegally. Becoming a US citizen is not cheap. It is expensive, but it is something that they must work for.
Spencer May 16, 2013 at 04:42 pm
Perhaps because people who vote continue to vote the same way they have for years--and expect to getRead More different results when they do so?